00Stinger
100 - 7
???
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course. But when Geelong beat Collingwood in 2011 no one was expecting Hawthorn to emerge like they did.
Take down the posters in your room. It will help you to get over him leaving.
Huh? Didn't Hawthorn just lose a thrilling PF to Collingwood that year? And didn't they already have the nucleus of star power in a team that had won a premiership a few years earlier?
Maybe no-one was predicting a three-peat - they're pretty hard to do and take more than just playing talent - but Hawthorn's "emergence" in 2012 was hardly a surprise.
No doubt! The rate at which Hawk fans still sulk about Buddy leaving does tend to suggest a need for anusol though...The threepeat helped
No doubt! The rate at which Hawk fans still sulk about Buddy leaving does tend to suggest a need for anusol though...
No problem with the Swans taking Buddy over GWS. Whilst it wasn't fair process due to the Swan's salary cap advantage, it did begin the process for the end of COLA and will handicap the Swans salary cap for another 5 years or so.
.
The Giants had a far bigger salary cap advantage at the time than the Swans. They had COLA AND their initial list concessions (which included extra in the cap). So COLA had nothing to do with the Swans' ability to beat out GWS.
There's no evidence yet of the Swans' salary cap being handicapped by Buddy's salary. He's not the only player in the league on that kind of money and he's performing to the level you'd want from someone being paid that amount (which is more than you can say for some other $1m+ players). It will only become an issue if he fails to see out his contract by more than a season. We'll have to wait and see.
Weren’t a chance to begin with
The Hawks offered more per year thoughI was referring to the Swans ability to outbid the Hawks (using COLA)
.
I was referring to the Swans ability to outbid the Hawks (using COLA)
The Hawks offered more per year though
The Hawks offered more per year though
OK, so you’re confident the Swans have been eclipsed but apart from the Tigers you’re unable to enlighten us as to who’s eclipsed them.Of course. But when Geelong beat Collingwood in 2011 no one was expecting Hawthorn to emerge like they did.
Richmond are there. The question is who is going to join them? Port? Melbourne? Someone else?
Collingwood were slight favourites ahead of usIt would be interesting to know was favourite at the start of 2012? I'd guess Collingwood?
Collingwood were slight favourites ahead of us
Pick 19 was fair.No problem with the Swans taking Buddy over GWS. Whilst it wasn't fair process due to the Swan's salary cap advantage, it did begin the process for the end of COLA and will handicap the Swans salary cap for another 5 years or so.
I was more annoyed that apparently compensation for Buddy under the longest and most lucrative contract of all time was only pick #19. That was more the AFL's issue under Vlad.
So the Swans lose a ruckman close to the season starting and the AFL is now pushing a Mid Season trade period to start ASAP this year??
Hmmmm how convenient and it took the Swans to suffer the fate many other teams have had in the Pre Season before but the AFL are quickly trying to rush in a new system all of a sudden to benefit their love child team base.......
I like the idea but gee the timing stinks to high heaven and good one Gill i suppose as there is no way the AFL will let NSW not be competitive.
Lunar landers dont melt steel beams.Where do you stand on the moon landing being faked and 9/11 being an inside job?