So manslaughter, not murder?In the squad, not the 22
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
So manslaughter, not murder?In the squad, not the 22
Out: Walker Gibbs Frampton PoholkeBench is M. Crouch, Gibbs, Poholke, Walker, Hartigan, Frampton, McAdam and Himmelberg
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Have you ever watched Hartigan play?Out: Walker Gibbs Frampton Poholke
In: MCrouch Hartigan Mcadam Himmelberg
Smith and Hamill are fine for those roles. I would think this is the most positive team we have seen in quite a while, there are some massive players getting dropped this week.How does Gibbs get named even on an extended bench.
Two wingers in Atkins and Seedsman out... who else on the bench fits those roles?
What a clownish outfit we have representing us.
I'll reserve judgement until final call.
However, if Gibbs, Walker and Mrouch are all in, I think that'll just about do me for Nicks.
Himmelberg is coming in too based on the Nicks dialogue this week. Tex never gets named on the bench, I would say that’s as good a indicator that he’s out barring any mishaps at the main training tomorrow.I'll reserve judgement until the 4 are cut but if it's McAdam and Gibbs for Seeds and Rat I'll be very disappointed.
Yeah one of his biggest critics but would play McAsey forward and feel Butts not ready yet.Have you ever watched Hartigan play?
I would like to see Sloane thereHamill on the wing, I like it, I like it a lot.
How Murphy keeps his spot after that diabolical display I'll never know but atleast there is some sort of accountability being shown.
In a perfect world Lynch and Murphy also would be out but as long as McAdam and Frampton come in I'll be happy.
I think he's been in amongst the best in the 2s, and given they've been belted it's probably a "well done" selection..... Which I don't like.How does Gibbs get named even on an extended bench.
Two wingers in Atkins and Seedsman out... who else on the bench fits those roles?
What a clownish outfit we have representing us.
Tex is out, he’s never named on the benchI’d wager Gibbs, McAdam for Atkins and Seedsman
Our squad is so raw and unexposed to AFL football (18 players with less than 10 games) we can't realistically have 4 debutants each week.
Picking Gibbs would be unacceptable, but I feel if we can get McAdam in the side, drop two senior players (Seedsman and Walker), Atkins is also out, and can give Poholke/Himmelberg/Frampton another chance, that would be a good result.
Two out this week, another two next week, continue rolling in the changes and debutants. It's the best we can hope for
I’d wager Gibbs, McAdam for Atkins and Seedsman
Atkins is a forced change.
So if after the last 2 weeks effort, we lose 1 senior player by choice, and bring king of the plod squad Gibbs in to fill one of those positions, no thanks.
And Harto for McAsey, citing "he's going to be a player for us, but he needs a break"I think you're close but Nicks has been speaking all week about getting marking power into the forward line. Would be surprised if one of the ruck/forwards doesn't make the cut.
Classic Crows would be Gibbs straight in
Seedsman and McHenry?Smith and Hamill are fine for those roles. I would think this is the most positive team we have seen in quite a while, there are some massive players getting dropped this week.