Not sure that’s allowed is it?I'd want both players in and a guy who already played SANFL as the sub
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Not sure that’s allowed is it?I'd want both players in and a guy who already played SANFL as the sub
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Have you heard something?I except both Berry and Hately to play.
I do get a laugh from much of the self flagellation on this board, but I found this one a baffling call.
Sure Frampton isn't a mid, but he'd be better in both other aspects than Greenwood. That's not bagging Greenwood. But he's just not what you are suggesting he is or could be.
I'm not saying it would be good in the long run Bicks. But in his current form you would love to him in the team.
I swear you never used to be this contrary all the time.

You can replace him with a player that provides you with run and carry.I'd be livid if they dropped Berry, for a start it would make us weaker. Yes he needs to find the pill more, but he's just learning his craft as an 18 year old. On the other hand he's laying 8-10 crunching tackles a week, you can't replace that easily.
You can replace him with a player that provides you with run and carry.
Yeah and who then does the grunt work Berry is doing?
Dying his hair ??Frampton isn’t better than Greenwood at anything
Port will win, that's 3Not getting a good feeling about this weekend. Bad things generally come in 3's.
You know what I was thinking after watching the first three quarters against North Melbourne last week?
That the answer to such a terrible display of football is backing the boys in to respond