Preview Changes vs Dogs

[jacko57]

They're the same thing jacko, as was reported in this article.

just an attempt at humor....maybe not my best work

 

[True North]

Hansen must be back in.........punters are falling out of tree's to back the Dogs at the line!

McMahon will miss another two I'd suggest, it's a pretty awful thing to get, especially as severe as he had it.

 

[Mr Reliable]

just an attempt at humor....maybe not my best work

I noticed and enjoyed it, jacko.

 

[Twinkletoes]

I noticed and enjoyed it, jacko.

As did I (albeit after a good night's sleep and your explanation jacko!) :screamfaceofexhaustionlastnight

 

[Deep We11s 1]

In: Hansen, Grima, Goldstein, Warren, Greenwood
Out: Pedersen, Tarrant, Delaney, Mullett, Edwards

A complete restructure of our talls is desperately needed. Improve hit outs to advantage, extra tall in defence releasing Firrito & Thompson, more mobility in forward line, Greenwood must play and Mullett most likely to be unlucky one. Hansen can swing forward depending on need and defensive match ups.

.... what I think will actually happen:
In: Goldstein & Hansen/Grima
Out: Pedersen & Tarrant

 

[Saintly31]

They're the same thing jacko, as was reported in this article.

The article is a bit misleading too mate.

Hives is just a minor nuisance in the "urticaria spectrum", severe urticaria is much worse than hives and really nothing like it - for anyone that has suffered it (I did about 5 years ago) its a nightmare....

 

[scooby1279]

In: Hansen, Grima, Goldstein, Warren, Greenwood
Out: Pedersen, Tarrant, Delaney, Mullett, Edwards

A complete restructure of our talls is desperately needed. Improve hit outs to advantage, extra tall in defence releasing Firrito & Thompson, more mobility in forward line, Greenwood must play and Mullett most likely to be unlucky one. Hansen can swing forward depending on need and defensive match ups.

.... what I think will actually happen:
In: Goldstein & Hansen/Grima
Out: Pedersen & Tarrant

Whats the logic of dropping Edwards? I don't get it....

 

[Deep We11s 1]

Whats the logic of dropping Edwards? I don't get it....

I think I've reached the conclusion that he's too one dimensional (lead into space and mark, good kick for goal) and doesn't offer much in a contested mark situation, or on the ground, or with his foot disposal, or with his decsion making, or with his ability to the read the play and link. In a good team he could be valuable leading out of the square but we need a bit more than that at the moment. In particular he gets lost once more than 50 out from goal. Maybe we can afford to have him play exclusively out of the square with Petrie and resting ruck (and maybe Milky) pushing higher? I thin it was a big mistake to play him on the SCG and at Subi against good teams in damp conditions.

 

[TennisPlayerAndy]

I think I've reached the conclusion that he's too one dimensional (lead into space and mark, good kick for goal) and doesn't offer much in a contested mark situation, or on the ground, or with his foot disposal, or with his decsion making, or with his ability to the read the play and link. In a good team he could be valuable leading out of the square but we need a bit more than that at the moment. In particular he gets lost once more than 50 out from goal. Maybe we can afford to have him play exclusively out of the square with Petrie and resting ruck (and maybe Milky) pushing higher? I thin it was a big mistake to play him on the SCG and at Subi against good teams in damp conditions.

Edwards works his ****ing ring off and is a good/very good contested mark.

Will not be dropped.

 

[GarnerSmash]

I think I've reached the conclusion that he's too one dimensional (lead into space and mark, good kick for goal) and doesn't offer much in a contested mark situation, or on the ground, or with his foot disposal, or with his decsion making, or with his ability to the read the play and link. In a good team he could be valuable leading out of the square but we need a bit more than that at the moment. In particular he gets lost once more than 50 out from goal. Maybe we can afford to have him play exclusively out of the square with Petrie and resting ruck (and maybe Milky) pushing higher? I thin it was a big mistake to play him on the SCG and at Subi against good teams in damp conditions.

Tonight I'm gonna bag Az like its 2 thousand and nine.

 

[Fart Cummings]

no way id have milky in before edwards.....

if milky is kicking bags of 5 in the vfl edwards would be kicking bags of 10

 

[Saintly31]

Edwards shouldn't be dropped, but he wouldn't want another quiet game either.

Seems to be a much better player in still/dry conditions at Etihad, struggles badly in less suitable conditions so hopefully a big game for him this week.

 

[tonydean]

Don't worry about Edwards boys, we'll play him into form. We play every bloody one into form!

 

[Kcrack]

Please play Petrie back into form..

 

[scooby1279]

Edwards works his ****ing ring off and is a good/very good contested mark.

Will not be dropped.

Totally agree... Our leading goal kicker for god sake. Yes he is know Carey, but who is asking him to play that way? He is another forward option and has played well in most of the games. Last week the coach asked him to play a defensive role for the first half and he did that well (No idea why he was ask to do that in the first place though).... We need Petrie to stand up, and this will cause headaches for many backs.

 

[jacko57]

Don't worry about Edwards boys, we'll play him into form. We play every bloody one into form!

Yeah? I'll believe that when Tarrant kicks 5!

 

[tales129]

In: mckenzie goldstein sierakowski warren c delaney
Out: tarrant Mullet

 

[roos_fanatic08]

Official Changes:

In:Goldstein, Seirakowski, Cam Delaney, Brad Mckenzie, Ben Warren

Out: Tarrant, Mullett


Gee, Greenwood, Garlett and Hansen very stiff.

 

[Benno_900]

IN: Goldstein, Warren, C Delaney, Sierakowski, McKenzie
OUT: Tarrant, Mullett

INT: Warren, Adams, Anthony, C Delaney, Pedersen, Sierakowski, McKenzie

Interesting changes.

Goldstein is a definite in for Tarrant and Warren looks like he is in for Mullett.

Can't see Pedersen or Delaney staying in (too top heavy) so looks like we'll have a debutant.

 

[Old Skool]

Milky had better get the nod.

 

[The Nostradamus]

great to see goldy straight back in and also the debut of McKenzie, very excited

 

[Souup]

Excited to see Sierakowski knocking on the door. Obviously wont get a crack this week, but hopefully in the next few weeks he plays well in the VFL and gets his shot soon enough

 

[Joshen]

Jones out makes me doubt we'll bring in an extra KPD (although it would be nice to see the brothers play together).

Goldy and Warren in from that bunch I would say (possibly another tall out for a runner??)

 

[giantroo]

I think I've reached the conclusion that he's too one dimensional (lead into space and mark, good kick for goal) and doesn't offer much in a contested mark situation, or on the ground, or with his foot disposal, or with his decsion making, or with his ability to the read the play and link. In a good team he could be valuable leading out of the square but we need a bit more than that at the moment. In particular he gets lost once more than 50 out from goal. Maybe we can afford to have him play exclusively out of the square with Petrie and resting ruck (and maybe Milky) pushing higher? I thin it was a big mistake to play him on the SCG and at Subi against good teams in damp conditions.

Edwards doesn't offer much in a contested mark situation? whaaaaa....??

I have seen it all now...

 

[TheKanga]

Looks like Goldy and Mckenzie are definite in's
Warren, Seirakowski and Delaney will be emergencies.
I think Warren will get a game soon though.