Danger is better, I honestly cant argue otherwise.
Thats not a knock on Dusty though who is still an amazing player.
Thats not a knock on Dusty though who is still an amazing player.
Opinion Dustin Martin is better than Dangerfield
- Thread starter Cadillac
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Sttew
Brownlow Medallist
Dusty must be well ahead in the Brownlow votes ATM
- May 8, 2007
- 48,686
- 71,373
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Banned
- #1,353
Not sure as he had a quiet 3 weeks with the groin and fractured cheek issues.
Stevi_Tigers
TheBrownDog
- Mar 2, 2013
- 55,058
- 116,841
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Manchester United
can we interest you in a todd elton
Danger's best is still better than Dusty's best. Danger has that extra 'freak' level that he hits sometimes which is hard to match.
We have the cats this week the board think Selwood is better than Danger which then obviously would make the best midfielder in the league is that a fair assessment
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
- Apr 3, 2006
- 33,533
- 11,954
- AFL Club
- Geelong
It's not an outrageous comment.
GreyCrow
TheBrownDog
- Mar 21, 2016
- 74,601
- 118,508
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Sturt, White Sox
Once again you fail at comprehension
The question is ' who would you tag to have the better chance of beating Geelong, Selwood or Dangerfield?''
Dangerfield the better player, Dusty could possibly earn close to double of what Dangerfield is earning.. 
Why because danger is a receiver and doesn't hurt you whilst Selwood is tearing it up
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
- Oct 3, 2012
- 12,826
- 24,563
- AFL Club
- Richmond
He won the flags by himself did he? Just remember Mitch Morton has a premiership.
- Apr 3, 2006
- 33,533
- 11,954
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Dangerfield the better player, Dusty could possibly earn close to double of what Dangerfield is earning..
Cats have done very well to get a premo player for a normal-type salary.
Sttew
Brownlow Medallist
Not sure who that is good for?Dangerfield the better player, Dusty could possibly earn close to double of what Dangerfield is earning..
We've seen the fallout at Sydney with the salaries that Buddy & Tippett are on. Inevitably you lose good players because they want more money and it isn't there
Dangerfield the better player, Dusty could possibly earn close to double of what Dangerfield is earning..
Geelong were the exceptionally lucky that Dangerfield didn't leave for money. I am glad the cats didn't have to pay a ridiculous amount for him; am still not sure any player is worth that much salary cap
- May 8, 2007
- 48,686
- 71,373
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Banned
- #1,367
Nup, no way. Selwood better than Dusty and Danger
MowShow
Club Legend
- May 10, 2012
- 1,780
- 2,780
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Sorry but Dusty is streets ahead of Dangerfield.. Similarly leveled physically but Dusty has far superior skills.
Best player in the comp by some margin IMO.
Best player in the comp by some margin IMO.
- Jun 2, 2010
- 5,466
- 6,008
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Yep Dusty as good if not better.
Cat fans saying Danger come on open your eyes both great ,but please. Dusty on equal levels without a doubt or better.More versitle and can go forward kick you 4 or 5 goals in a quarter.He has that explosive gear to like Danger.
Danger can also go forward and kick goals at will! Danger is probably more explosive but dustys skills shits all over danger not sure which i would rather just 1 of them would be nice haha
Selwood is nowhere near "easy" best 3. He is at best "arguable" top 3.
Imo, can't handle a tag, is a whinge, and just like half of the Brisbane lions team, is talked up as a better player than what he is because he was a kid in an elite side that won flags.
I would prefer, Gray or Cotchin to Selwood.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
My current power rankings:
1. Patrick Dangerfield
2. Dustin Martin
3. Rory Sloane
4. Scott Pendlebury
5. Joel Selwood
1. Patrick Dangerfield
2. Dustin Martin
3. Rory Sloane
4. Scott Pendlebury
5. Joel Selwood
