Cameron's form has been shocking for the last month, hence Geelong has been struggling.There's been some poor takes on this site, but potting a kid for giving the best forward in the game a complete bath is up there.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cameron's form has been shocking for the last month, hence Geelong has been struggling.There's been some poor takes on this site, but potting a kid for giving the best forward in the game a complete bath is up there.
Last game Cameron had 21d and 2 goals plus coming off the bye he would've been fresh so shouldn't have any excuses yet I've seen Geelong fans comment it was his worst game in a cats guernsey.Cameron's form has been shocking for the last month, hence Geelong has been struggling
It's more so out of those 6 disposals there were 2 very horrible kick turnovers. The 6 possessions is interesting, if the ball was directed through Cameron then Bergman should have gotten more possession had he really beaten him but even Cameron only had 10 possessions himself so he wasn't even getting to a lot of the contest?Last game Cameron had 21d and 2 goals plus coming off the bye he would've been fresh so shouldn't have any excuses yet I've seen Geelong fans comment it was his worst game in a cats guernsey.
No matter what form he's in he was completely outplayed. And for Bergman who has really only been used in an intercepting role, to show he can be used in a lockdown role is quite impressive I thought. So to cop criticism for only having 6 possessions yet dominating the best fwd in the comp is ridiculous.
Yeah that's not really how it works, almost every key defender that plays on the opposition's best fwd is a low possession winner, so it's not like 6 possessions playing that role is a competition outlier.It's more so out of those 6 disposals there were 2 very horrible kick turnovers. The 6 possessions is interesting, if the ball was directed through Cameron then Bergman should have gotten more possession had he really beaten him but even Cameron only had 10 possessions himself so he wasn't even getting to a lot of the contest?
I think it leads to the highest source of scoring endpoints in our team:Did a great job defensively.
What did you think of his disposals? Be honest now.
Let's just calm down. Cunningham kept Charlie Cameron goalless today. That doesn't move the needle in his trade value.Last game Cameron had 21d and 2 goals plus coming off the bye he would've been fresh so shouldn't have any excuses yet I've seen Geelong fans comment it was his worst game in a cats guernsey.
No matter what form he's in he was completely outplayed. And for Bergman who has really only been used in an intercepting role, to show he can be used in a lockdown role is quite impressive I thought. So to cop criticism for only having 6 possessions yet dominating the best fwd in the comp is ridiculous.
Especially as Cunningham only got 7 possessions.Let's just calm down. Cunningham kept Charlie Cameron goalless today. That doesn't move the needle in his trade value.
exactly. hopefully Sydney fans aren't demanding a first rounder for CunninghamEspecially as Cunningham only got 7 possessions.
Obviously you care.I think it leads to the highest source of scoring endpoints in our team:
“Port Adelaide have scored more points (63) from Bergman’s intercepts than any other player.”
Give it up you’re wrong and apart from you nobody else cares and even if your point is accurate Re his disposal it doesn’t matter why doesn’t it matter
“Port Adelaide have scored more points (63) from Bergman’s intercepts than any other player.”
behind Trent Rivers then it will be interesting to see how Trent Rivers goes on Jeremy Cameron the next time Melbourne play GeelongCal Twomey actually mentioned a pick around 10 in a recent show of his so you may be right. You may get that but as a dees fan though I would be filthy throwing away a first rounder on someone who hasn't shown offensive weaponry. He is behind Trent Rivers and I would probably only expect an early 2nd round pick for Rivers if he wanted to head home and was out of contract.
Cunningham from Sydney blanketed Charlie Cameron to 0 goals last night. In today's game there's not many true 1 on 1's. Especially with team defence. If Bergman was winning 1 on 1's and intercepting he would've had more than 6 possessions. I still tip my hat to him for keeping Cameron quiet but as Cunningham showed defenders rely a lot on the pressure of the midfield to ensure that the ball isn't coming in thick and fast. And only 43 inside 50's for Geelong supports this. That's an extremely low number of inside 50's. extremely low.behind Trent Rivers then it will be interesting to see how Trent Rivers goes on Jeremy Cameron the next time Melbourne play Geelong
ROFL being the highest source of scoring from intercept marks is “obscure” friend what are your thoughts on climate change, 5G networks in mRNA vaccines and aliens?Obviously you care.
I’ll make this easy for you as you’ve yet again managed to avoid answering a very simple question by deflecting and grasping at an obscure statistic with no source and no comparative against the rest of the league.
Against Geelong Bergman disposed of the ball six times and gave it to Geelong on three of those occasions.
If football was an egalitarian pursuit onfield Bergman was perfect.
“Half the time I get the ball I share it with the opposition.”
But football is not about sharing.
If Bergman deserves praise for a lock down role on Cameron, surely he deserves criticism for continuing his season long butchering of the ball in the same game?
Quote the source.ROFL being the highest source of scoring from intercept marks is “obscure” friend what are your thoughts on climate change, 5G networks in mRNA vaccines and aliens?
Honestly your capacity for mental gymnastics is elite
Ps I addressed your point re his disposal efficiency yes it might be poor but he’s still the highest source of scores from intercepts for my team which when you consider he stands next to Aliir Aliir is actually objectively impressive but nah definitely a 3rd round pick upgrade because he turns it over every now and then
Marc McGowan in the age yesterday there’s an entire article on MilesQuote the source.
Marc McGowan in the age yesterday there’s an entire article on Miles
Marc McGowan in the age yesterday there’s an entire article on Miles
Port Adelaide Power rising star Miles Bergman heads home to Melbourne as he weighs up AFL futureQuote the source.
Haha, if we wanted some loose, kick scab, seagulling around half back and doing dinky little sideways 15 metre kicks we would play dbj back there or recruit a Daicos type who can’t win The hardballHow does Bergman compare to the rest of the league?
Is he 9th best in the league on this points from intercepts measure, like he is 9th worst in the league for ball retention when he disposes of the ball?
Is he second best in the league on this points from intercepts measure, like he is second worst in the league on Champion Data’s kick rating measure?
A number without comparison against the broader population is just that - a number.
Is 63 points generated impressive? It’s only 4.5 points per game. In April Melbourne were generating 63 points from turnovers every game - that’s almost 3 points per player per game. With that context 4.5 points per game for a supposed intercept king (Bergman is 77th in the league on that measure) doesn’t seem particularly noteworthy.
If his intercepts are generating 4.5 points a game what are his turnovers costing Port per game? In other words what is his risk/reward position? How does he stack up against peers?
AFL teams do deep analytics for a reason. You should try to broaden your mind and perspective too.
Omfg are you seriously arguing that the highest source of scores from intercepts marks for the team 2nd on the ladder despite playing with Aliir who is in close to if not in AA form isn’t good enough ?How does Bergman compare to the rest of the league?
Is he 9th best in the league on this points from intercepts measure, like he is 9th worst in the league for ball retention when he disposes of the ball?
Is he second best in the league on this points from intercepts measure, like he is second worst in the league on Champion Data’s kick rating measure?
A number without comparison against the broader population is just that - a number.
Is 63 points generated impressive? It’s only 4.5 points per game. In April Melbourne were generating 63 points from turnovers every game - that’s almost 3 points per player per game. With that context 4.5 points per game for a supposed intercept king (Bergman is 77th in the league on that measure) doesn’t seem particularly noteworthy.
If his intercepts are generating 4.5 points a game what are his turnovers costing Port per game? In other words what is his risk/reward position? How does he stack up against peers?
AFL teams do deep analytics for a reason. You should try to broaden your mind and perspective too.