That selective use of stats can 'prove' whatever you like? No, you did a very good job on that.
Firstly, my use of "our team was younger" was correct. Marginally younger, yes, but younger. And I didn't use it as a dick-measuring contest as you thought, I used it to highlight how the decline of a raft of our senior players has resulted in the necessary use of a bunch of our kids - which has, in turn, contributed to some of our shoddy performances this year.
Secondly, the point of my entire post was that Richmond's core group is older than Collingwood's. That point remains and is bang on. I then used that to argue that time is on Collingwood's side, but the man in charge is our problem.
Thirdly, **** off.