Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How would they feel about the dogs taking BTK?How's the Melbourne media all working to the common goal of moving Bevo on one way or another, whether it's his time to call it himself or a sacking it looks inevitable.
Meanwhile back the ranch.
Was gonna say, would they even want the loser?I don't think Chris Scott would want his stink of career failure near his group
It's probably his wheelhouse he's just been on the best part of a 15 year highly paid detour.Can see him ekeing out a further 2-3 years back at Geelong in a role similar to Choco at Melbourne.
Tredrea won’t even say Hinkleys name. He’s being very careful to not be seen to directly attack/question him or even comment on him directly.
How's the Melbourne media all working to the common goal of moving Bevo on one way or another, whether it's his time to call it himself or a sacking it looks inevitable.
Meanwhile back the ranch.
I can imagine the reaction from Tom Hawkins when Ken tells him, "I want you to lead into the pockets, and furthermore, I don't want you to actually take the mark - rather I want you to bring the ball to ground, which allows the crumbers to pick up the scraps and kick the goal."Was gonna say, would they even want the loser?
End of the day...there's a reason why he was passed over for Chris Scott in 2011, despite the Cats players fawning over him then and since.
We just couldn't see it because we were (rightfully) high on that 2013 sugar hit and the shiny new toy of Adelaide Oval circa 2014.
"Or even better, get it out of bounds for a throw-in so we can reset. It worked a treat for us in 2018, were were 11-4!"I can imagine the reaction from Tom Hawkins when Ken tells him, "I want you to lead into the pockets, and furthermore, I don't want you to actually take the mark - rather I want you to bring the ball to ground, which allows the crumbers to pick up the scraps and kick the goal."
So then the media (maybe) ask "well you haven't performed well in marquee fixtures in previous years. In fact you went out of finals in straight sets last year and have been belted in finals where you were favourites to win at home, yet you decided to renew Ken's contract for a further 2 years. What's changed?"Nah, it’s easy.
“We went into this season with high hopes, but unfortunately our performances in marquee fixtures have been nowhere near the level required, and we think it’s in the best interests of the club to make a change now. We thank Ken for his years of hard work and wish him all the best in the future”.
Not hard at all.
Good. So then not only do we get rid of Ken, but the media appetite for another scalp as as scapegoat will hopefully mean that one of Koch/Richardson/CD has to fall on their sword for the ridiculous decision to extend Ken in August pre-finals.So then the media (maybe) ask "well you haven't performed well in marquee fixtures in previous years. In fact you went out of finals in straight sets last year and have been belted in finals where you were favourites to win at home, yet you decided to renew Ken's contract for a further 2 years. What's changed?"
How's the Melbourne media all working to the common goal of moving Bevo on one way or another, whether it's his time to call it himself or a sacking it looks inevitable.
Meanwhile back the ranch.
Koch has all the data he needs but his decision to extend Hinkley's contract shows that he has no idea how to interpret that data to extract information..... Kosch is a data man and apparently.he and the board had all the data they needed. ....
I'd be surprised if they sacked Ken without 'new evidence' before his contract is up. It's kind of like Double Jeopardy. They already tried Ken on all of the existing evidence last year. The failures in finals. The big game performances. Playing injured players. Our forward conversion. Remember? Kosch is a data man and apparently.he and the board had all the data they needed. Unless something goes to a new level over the course of the next two years, like we don't make finals or win the spoon or something, sacking him would be admitting they made a mistake in extending his contract.
I can see them masking it in some.sort.of 'succession plan' or retirement.
I can just imagine Andrew Mackie is his role at Geelong looking through Assistant Coach applications, and then letting out a big guffaw as he bins Ken's application without even reading it.Can see him ekeing out a further 2-3 years back at Geelong in a role similar to Choco at Melbourne.
I can just imagine Andrew Mackie is his role at Geelong looking through Assistant Coach applications, and then letting out a big guffaw as he bins Ken's application without even reading it.
All those 07/09 Cats guys rave about him.
He’s a hype man and fluffer, not a tactician. It’d be the perfect role for him.
The odds of us winning our next 13 games are only slightly shorter than the odds of someone coaching more games than Ken without making a grand final.
I remember that clock. I donated mine to Vinnies.Back in the days when they used to give us a few merchandise trinkets with our membership packs (remember the pens!) one year I got a Port Adelaide clock. It's a nice little clock, but it sometimes stops for no good reason - it's not because the battery has gone flat, because I give it a bashing and it runs good as gold for another few weeks, until it happens again. It's the archetypal Port Power clock.
Another goody I got was a pair of Port Adelaide binoculars. I sometimes use them to see when things might change...
#sackhinkley
It's weird isn't it?How's the Melbourne media all working to the common goal of moving Bevo on one way or another, whether it's his time to call it himself or a sacking it looks inevitable.
Meanwhile back the ranch.
Brad Scott is not far behind him. We need to back Ken in .The odds of us winning our next 13 games are only slightly shorter than the odds of someone coaching more games than Ken without making a grand final.
That's his point. This is an anti-Hinkley post.