Pure_Ownage
TheBrownDog
He is a decent player but after a year in the vfl at his age he doesn't have great trade value, 45-50 is where he should sit. 51 probably gets close and gives you extra points for naish which you will probably take.
Recommitted Sam Lloyd
- Thread starter HumanMeatball
- Start date
- Tagged users None
He is a decent player but after a year in the vfl at his age he doesn't have great trade value, 45-50 is where he should sit. 51 probably gets close and gives you extra points for naish which you will probably take.
- May 14, 2012
- 8,176
- 12,893
- AFL Club
- Geelong
And that is exactly what he is, a natural footballer. If you could get him 10-15% fitter i think he could have 3 or 4 really good years at the top level.
cannot
Norm Smith Medallist
- Banned
- #78
he went from being a fatty a couple years ago to getting 50 touches in a vfl game last month. 5 goals also (in the same game...) i think his fitness is good now, or at least much better
a proper midfielder capable of a lot of touches and goals i reckon. As well being capable kicking bags when forward.
Would love for him to stay on the list again for another year if not i think he will be successful at where ever he goes
Last edited:
- May 16, 2014
- 12,163
- 15,984
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Career high of 3 goals in a game, 28 soon. I'd hardly say he's 'capable of kicking bags'.
Definitely worth getting for a pick in the 40s-50s though. Value would have been much higher in 2016 after a very solid year but going down to depth at his age, premiership club or not, does not help his value.
Definitely worth getting for a pick in the 40s-50s though. Value would have been much higher in 2016 after a very solid year but going down to depth at his age, premiership club or not, does not help his value.
Similar threads
