Sheezel. Trade 3 to Sydney
Swans- 3 and F3
North- 14, 17 and F1
Leaves North with 2, 14, 17, 40, 43, 59
Ports future first
Sydney’s future first
Gives you six first round picks over a two year period.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sheezel. Trade 3 to Sydney
Swans- 3 and F3
North- 14, 17 and F1
Leaves North with 2, 14, 17, 40, 43, 59
Ports future first
Sydney’s future first
Gives you six first round picks over a two year period.
wardlaw has the dodgy hammies, played the first half of the year only, didnt test on the weekend at the combine
6 first rounder bing bing wahooooooo~Sheezel. Trade 3 to Sydney
Swans- 3 and F3
North- 14, 17 and F1
Leaves North with 2, 14, 17, 40, 43, 59
Ports future first
Sydney’s future first
Gives you six first round picks over a two year period.
those 2 are big bodied tall midsI think overlooking Wardlaw could end up being akin to Billings over Bontempelli or McCartin over Petracca. Even if you reckon we're set for midfielders it would be negligent to let another club just have an absolute weapon like him, and you don't know what we'll need a few years from now.
not sure on prior years but he pinged it twice this yearIs it just the one injury or has it been a recurrent thing?
6 first rounder bing bing wahooooooo~
They're all top 5 picks right, the good ones? No? Top 10 then surely! Well whatever, first rounders are first rounders, it's not the number of the pick that counts but the number of picks.
May be a good reason to keep the top five pick then? And it gains us one extra late first rounder for 2023. We already have ours and Ports.This years draft is extremely even outside the top 5. Next years is better and the deal gains you three first round picks for 2023. Hayes and Keeler are decent key position prospects who will be available at 14 and 17. Hayes a key back and Keeler a fwd/ruck.
I think we take Sheezel and Wardlaw. Cunnington isn’t gonna be here forever.
Also do we want * taking Wardlaw or Tsatas is much of the same of what they have whereas Wardlaw will change their dynamic.
Yes we shouldn’t pick solely on who our rivals may take but on this occasion it needs to be considered.
Wardlaw BF*AAK
those 2 are big bodied tall mids
wardlaw is more phillips size with pace and a dodgy hammy
Is it just the one injury or has it been a recurrent thing?
Haha you’ve already written off Wardlaw, haven’t you?
IMO the best prospect in the draft over Ashcroft.
he will be decent but is a small inside mid with dodgy hammiesHaha you’ve already written off Wardlaw, haven’t you?
IMO the best prospect in the draft over Ashcroft.
and offer us more flexibility by playing multiple positions
Hopefull WiFi and Powell can became the distributers in the middle out to these guys.We still need more accumulation. It seems like every game we just can’t get our hands on the ball.
Take Tsatas instead of Wardlaw.
But either way you can’t complain.
no thats just wardlawShort crop this year, no big bodied mids ey?
no thats just wardlaw
tsatas is 188cm
yeah but if i have a choice between neale and say bont/clarry im going bont/clarryLachie Neale is a smidget but doesn’t stop him
Tsatas is 189 or something isnt he?Short crop this year, no big bodied mids ey?