List Mgmt. The 2017 Draft & Trade Hypotheticals Thread (cont. in Part II)

[caesar88]

I'd be happy with Ellis-Yolmen or Wellingham

But Collins is the best pick of the bunch IMO. Ross Lyon is certifiable for getting rid of him

 

[Superstar swan]

I'd be happy with Ellis-Yolmen or Wellingham

But Collins is the best pick of the bunch IMO. Ross Lyon is certifiable for getting rid of him

Any one of those 3 and id be content we have done the right thing

 

[caesar88]

Any one of those 3 and id be content we have done the right thing

None would be best 22 though IMO but more than handy depth

 

[LukeParkerno1]

I'd rather get the others than Wellingham

 

[Punts]

He does , but so did TK. Happy with that.

Doesn't need to keep developing on the main list
Rookie list is fine

 

[doona]

Doesn't need to keep developing on the main list
Rookie list is fine

Agree with this. Rookies should only get promoted if they are best 22 or really pushing the best 22.

He doesn’t strike me as either at this stage.

 

[S120]

Doesn't need to keep developing on the main list
Rookie list is fine

There hasn't been any official word that O'Riordan has been upgraded to be fair.

 

[6yearsold]

hasn't oriordan had his max 3 years on the rookie list?

 

[Chaisa]

hasn't oriordan had his max 3 years on the rookie list?

Nah 2018 would be his 3rd year.

 

[6yearsold]

toby pink is another one who should go. he is almost below neafl standard and not even in contention for a senior spot.

 

[ScrewInStuds]

Seeing as foxsports think Colin O’Rourke plays for the Swans, I will be waiting for the official announcement.

That article also has us with pick 70, which we gave to Collingwood in the Murray trade. Editor must be on annual leave.

 

[Superstar swan]

toby pink is another one who should go. he is almost below neafl standard and not even in contention for a senior spot.

Forwards always given extra time

 

[Neverwas]

toby pink is another one who should go. he is almost below neafl standard and not even in contention for a senior spot.

No way. You need to have a good look. The kid is really young and has a well rounded game. Totally disagree.

Sent from my SM-T805Y using Tapatalk

 

[LukeParkerno1]

No way. You need to have a good look. The kid is really young and has a well rounded game. Totally disagree.

Sent from my SM-T805Y using Tapatalk

Will need to have a big year in 2018. Not convinced. However he should have been kept on the list for 2018. Lets re-evaluate at the end of 2018.

 

[Mick Oxlong]

Will need to have a big year in 2018. Not convinced. However he should have been kept on the list for 2018. Lets re-evaluate at the end of 2018.

* me...sounds like you have a seat at the table!

 

[caesar88]

Fwiw I really liked Pink’s work rate for a big fella. Could bode well if he can develop his game to go with it

 

[Edmund hunt]

What's the latest of the DFA period?

 

[sataris]

Wouldn't mind holmes tbh.

 

[mtooler]

What happened to CEY? I remember reading huge wraps about how great he was going to be but nothing really came forward. Was it all injury?

I think in 2017 at the commencement Crows were thinking like for like with Thommo out and CEY in. Their game style and player preference changed with a now fit B.Couch they went smaller and faster and as a result the assets of CEY were no longer in the long term picture for the Crows style of play is how I read it.

 

[mtooler]

toby pink is another one who should go. he is almost below neafl standard and not even in contention for a senior spot.

Talls take 3 years to develop properly wont really know what we've got to work with until end of 2018 coming into 2019 early rounds.

 

[Edmund hunt]

What's the lastest with Wellingham?

 

[Superstar swan]

Anyone have any legitmate goss or news as to who we may be interested in as a DFA?

 

[Opts]

Cool head in pressure and has decent skill. Has shown some moments of brilliance and lots of mediocrity. Works hard and plays his role.

Why? Who does Wellingham replace in our firsts? No-one. He's old, will take the place of a youngster, isn't any good and was a part of the "rat-pack" which breaches our no dickhead policy.

 

[bedford]

Why? Who does Wellingham replace in our firsts? No-one. He's old, will take the place of a youngster, isn't any good and was a part of the "rat-pack" which breaches our no dickhead policy.

He's actually a very nice guy !, maybe we should have that policy on here

 

[caesar88]

Why? Who does Wellingham replace in our firsts? No-one. He's old, will take the place of a youngster, isn't any good and was a part of the "rat-pack" which breaches our no dickhead policy.

Um pretty sure Collingwood getting rid of the "rat-pack" is why they're in the s**t hole they're in right now and have been in for the last five years. I would have happily taken Swan or Shaw or Beams in a heart-beat. And Wellingham would be handy depth. I rate him more than others who were in our last finals game...