Then Fremantle will use their pick 6, If a trade not done during trade period. Other club won't get involve if they don't hold any advantage that favour them in trade. They got their own players trading to do and can still trade draft pick after players trading end.
Yep. When teams need to bid for an academy or father son selections points are relevant. When they dont the are totally irrelevant and its simply about the clubs achieving the picks they think will bring in the best players. Geelong has no early academy or father son selections this year, which means the points comparison is a waste of time. Geelong wont care if pick 24 and 33 equal points for pick 12 unless they can trade that to a team with bids to make. This year there are very few teams other than GWS who need to make early bids for players before pick 12 and they are way more likely to need to use their pick 12 and 18 to move up the draft for a green bid. In other words you are wasting your time comparing points for a top 13 pick as no team is in the market to need multiple later picks in exchange for an early pick.
If you dont get kelly its the same as losing kelly. A player who would be your best mid.
24 is a second rounder, and trying to hold the saints to ransom because of a player with mental health issues and wants to move clubs is not a good look. 24 is very fair for Steven.
If he was no longer a geelong player we wouldnt be able to trade him now would we? But alas we can.
Yep, gotta love the WC b/f logic on here. Why discuss a prospective trade in a prospective trade thread. On the actual subject matter if this trade is true to form like most trades that happen. Day 1 of trading. West Coast and Geelong beat their chest and say they are miles off. What ever they release to the media the end result of most trades that happen is nearly always half way in between what is said in the first meeting.
Steven is 30 and has mental health issues which meant he barely played any football this year. Pick 30 or lower. Regardless even if steven is worth a pick around 25 it still doesnt explain why we would take a low ball offer for kelly? Kelly is worth way way more then pick 14 and a second rounder.
My grammar is in progress, you need to be patient. As long you care to reply that mean you can understand even with my grammar limitations/flaws.
Its a bit early to go there because you dont know how the other players we pick up turn out ? Also I think Yeo and Shuey are better.
You got pick 14 and Steven, hardly lowball.
Steven has nothing to do with kelly. Stop trying to bring it in.
Ok. Assumed it was west coast.
Anyway I know for a fact that geelong supporters are openly abusing TK and his family via social media, super unethical I reckonAre you going with a running gag of making dense statements in this thread? You know what he is referring to.
Anyway I heard a rumour that WCE are pressuring Kelly's family back in the west, super unethical I reckon
Yes ethics is so blurred that we gave you 2 points and cost ourselves a finals spot in the process on the weekend when walsh was murdered. Collingwood and hawthorn disgracefully played football on the very evening after the murder. Most teams would of demanded 4 points with finals on the line. Eddie macguire definately would of. But we gave you two points that helped you make finals at our own expense.
Nah we met in real life before , just different persona in BF. In every trade deal one club will be taking under. Right now just wait and let both club deal with it.
Haha, I suggested a 3 way deal and you said you could get Steven for a later pick.
