I was writing Jack & Rohan off for the next few weeks at 3q time.
I had Rohan banished from NSW and Reid assassinated by quarter time.
Changed my mind slightly throughout the game.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
I was writing Jack & Rohan off for the next few weeks at 3q time.
Yes, the 'in the back' rule was officiated differently in those days. However, that in no way compensated for the crap that he had to put up with. Umpires had a working theory that he was big enough and nasty enough to look after himself and, consequently, didn't need their assistance. The result of that was that defenders regularly got away with pretty much whatever they wanted to dish out and that meant fouling him on a consistent basis.Lockett was allowed to stand his ground and shove defenders in the back.
Nothing in it I thought.Astbury bump on hayward being reviewed?
Thought the scoreboard flattered Richmond early because we failed to take some chances. Great effort to pull ourselves back into the game despite most of our midfield below their usual output. Richmond could have put the game beyond us early in the last with some bad misses. Left the door ajar and took advantage for a great win.
Thought we closed down their run after quarter time by playing man on man so hopefully Longmire has found the way to stop the chipping game that we've struggled with all year. The defence got better as the game wore on and thought we took the game on a bit more in the last. Very happy to get the win but still plenty of improvement required.
Kudos to Newman who had a great game and has really adjusted to the pace of the game and is continuing to improve.
It was a nice goal but it was thirty metres out which is about his distance. How he keeps Dawson out is another Longmire selection travesty
A bad mistake doesn't mean a bad game.
dude, he played in an era where it was one on one...not denigrating Locketts work, but if you think Lockett would get anywhere near 1300 goals playing they way Buddy cops it I think you are mistaken.I think you've forgotten how Lockett was umpired.
Just seeing some of the game again, Rance should be deadset embarrassed by the way he "defends".
He might be lauded by the Vic-centric numbskulls in the commentary box but he'll never hold a candle to any of the great backmen our game has seen because he's a scragging diving pretender who's got the umpires in his pocket.
That blatant hold on Buddy at the 50 metre arc was pathetic and I'm glad Bud shoved him onto his arse.
Rance should be grateful it wasn't Barry Hall otherwise the outcome would've been very different.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'd say 2-3 because Rance would be dead.Barry hall would give away 45 frees to Rance
More high contact in that than the Franklin one.Astbury bump on hayward being reviewed?
LiterallySnap.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We won every quarter after the first, which was very good.
We looked like a bottom 2 side in the first, which is very worrying.
Are you serious? Jack is a club warrior with weight of performance on the board. He has delivered. Hopefully Dawson will one day but he hasnt done anything yet. You can't promote blind hope over guys who have delivered.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Significantly you refer to Jack's achievements in the past tense and Dawson's in the future. One of the reasons we are in 12th position is Longmire's selecting of players who are past it. Jack is past it as an elite footballer and gives us nothing for the future. Dawson is a superb long kick, marks well and versatile. When Jacks kicks over 40 metres get back to me. You don't pick players on their past. Its form. On form Dawson is a mile in front of Jack and will only get better. Jack wontAre you serious? Jack is a club warrior with weight of performance on the board. He has delivered. Hopefully Dawson will one day but he hasnt done anything yet. You can't promote blind hope over guys who have delivered.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It is one of the necessary requirements of a ruckman to hold and take marks. Knocking blokes over is hardly sufficient reason for a ruckman to get a game. Sinclair doesn't take marks. Tippet does. If you play two rucks one of them must be able to hold grabs on the forward line. Another one of Longmire's genius selectionsI think it's more important for Tippet to demand a recall than drop Sinkers who puts himself about and takes a toll on our opponents.
I have a bigger one for you. Why wasn't Newman elevated out of the rookies last year and consequently didn't play in the GF and McVeigh did? If anyone suggests that Newman has greatly improved over the summer pre-season, I don't need to post on this Board to have my intelligence insultedLegit riddle me this:
How did Newman and paps not get drafted???
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Just seeing some of the game again, Rance should be deadset embarrassed by the way he "defends".
He might be lauded by the Vic-centric numbskulls in the commentary box but he'll never hold a candle to any of the great backmen our game has seen because he's a scragging diving pretender who's got the umpires in his pocket.
That blatant hold on Buddy at the 50 metre arc was pathetic and I'm glad Bud shoved him onto his arse.
Rance should be grateful it wasn't Barry Hall otherwise the outcome would've been very different.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And also, I think it was the 3rdQ, Dane burned Kieren, who was 20m in the clear, only to turn back inside and damn near turned it over. You could see it clearly because the camera was behind the goal.Rampe in the last cost us a goal by keeping the ball in. Nick Smith had his best game of the year in comparison.
Yep, spot onI think it's more important for Tippet to demand a recall than drop Sinkers who puts himself about and takes a toll on our opponents.