- Jan 12, 2011
- 25,401
- 35,580
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
ThanksI can really see your defence of democracy here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ThanksI can really see your defence of democracy here.
It means shorten is only governing for some. He is not Keating, he is not aspirational. He is not even Gillard?
is that why i know self funded retirees who will wholly end upworse off as a result of the franking credits windback and they arent elligible for the pension. furthermore they dont get much difference in terms of payments from their portfolio as those a generation younger who had very beneficial superannuation systems and didnt have superannuation as it predated the time they were working.Every bit of that post is a lie.....and whats more you know it is
is that why i know self funded retirees who will wholly end upworse off as a result of the franking credits windback and they arent elligible for the pension. furthermore they dont get much difference in terms of payments from their portfolio as those a generation younger who had very beneficial superannuation systems and didnt have superannuation as it predated the time they were working.
then when you have cops and a number of other similar occupations complaining re negative gearing about 1 property and who wont fit in to the 8 or 9 houses category that labor keeps telling us all about then it is clear that issues exist with the policies. but no we should all just listen to bill and labor about how they will assist battlers immensely especially when the former labor government and the current leader has such a gopd track record of doing this.
LOL let's just say it is not the boomers who will be hurt by the franking credits removal nearly as much as those who were the generation before them who were never beneficiaries or had the options like the boomers did to go in superannuation. They are the ones who will hurt and who aren't the legitimately loaded people like Turnbull or Jones.When you're clearly trying to cause emotive reactions by mentioning particular professions, I dunno that cops are who I would've gone with.
Diddums to boomers who've priced their kids out of the housing market, who got every advantage of free education, cheap housing et al, and still retain their sense of entitlement thinking they should get a refund on tax they didn't pay.
So I'm going to feel a sense of loss over money I never got?LOL let's just say it is not the boomers who will be hurt by the franking credits removal nearly as much as those who were the generation before them who were never beneficiaries or had the options like the boomers did to go in superannuation. They are the ones who will hurt and who aren't the legitimately loaded people like Turnbull or Jones.
LOL let's just say it is not the boomers who will be hurt by the franking credits removal nearly as much as those who were the generation before them who were never beneficiaries or had the options like the boomers did to go in superannuation. They are the ones who will hurt and who aren't the legitimately loaded people like Turnbull or Jones.
Hhahahahahaha!If you're that hard up, sell some of the portfolio that's earning you these franking credits - to earn enough from dividends that franking credits changes will leave such a big hole in your budget, your portfolio has to be worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.
And if you're still that hard up, sell the house that you got for nothing for a 3000% profit and live on that.
The people you talk about (ie. the ones losing large franking credits cos their portfolios are huge) are legitimately loaded not through skill or hard work, but through the sheer dumb luck of capital gains and every decision taken by Howard and Costello around super, tax and welfare being made to benefit them so as to buy their vote. The bullshit of "Howard's battlers" is now coming back to bite the rest of us in the arse, which is why we talk about structural deficit in the budget and the doubling of national debt under the current government. And it's why the rest of us will never buy a house while these greedy pricks own houses in great suburbs with share portfolios worth hundreds of thousands of dollars, but still hold their hand out for more.
The boomers, and the generation before them that you speak of, are the first people in Australia's history whose children will be worse off than they were - and they continue expecting more from us.
This sense of entitlement seems to be intergenerational - for some reason these age groups don't see the need for structural reform because they believe their children and grandchildren are entitled to inherit their sheer dumb luck while the beneficiaries tell the rest of us that we aren't working hard enough, we're not "having a go", and we're eating to much smashed avocado. And maybe that's how they sleep at night while ******* the rest of us in the arse.
YOu make a lot of assumptions about things don't you. Not everyone who will be affected has giant portfolios that are huge like you claim they are.If you're that hard up, sell some of the portfolio that's earning you these franking credits - to earn enough from dividends that franking credits changes will leave such a big hole in your budget, your portfolio has to be worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.
And if you're still that hard up, sell the house that you got for nothing for a 3000% profit and live on that.
The people you talk about (ie. the ones losing large franking credits cos their portfolios are huge) are legitimately loaded not through skill or hard work, but through the sheer dumb luck of capital gains and every decision taken by Howard and Costello around super, tax and welfare being made to benefit them so as to buy their vote. The bullshit of "Howard's battlers" is now coming back to bite the rest of us in the arse, which is why we talk about structural deficit in the budget and the doubling of national debt under the current government. And it's why the rest of us will never buy a house while these greedy pricks own houses in great suburbs with share portfolios worth hundreds of thousands of dollars, but still hold their hand out for more.
The boomers, and the generation before them that you speak of, are the first people in Australia's history whose children will be worse off than they were - and they continue expecting more from us.
This sense of entitlement seems to be intergenerational - for some reason these age groups don't see the need for structural reform because they believe their children and grandchildren are entitled to inherit their sheer dumb luck while the beneficiaries tell the rest of us that we aren't working hard enough, we're not "having a go", and we're eating to much smashed avocado. And maybe that's how they sleep at night while ******* the rest of us in the arse.
YOu make a lot of assumptions about things don't you. Not everyone who will be affected has giant portfolios that are huge like you claim they are.
Not all of them have property in these prime locations you refer to.
I'm guessing you are a millenial like me who is for largely socialist principles who deep down actuallt wants everything for free like their parents got?
Not gotten much attention, but an independent candidate in Farrer seems to be mounting a strong campaign - now the favourite according to one bookmakers.
is that why i know self funded retirees who will wholly end upworse off as a result of the franking credits windback and they arent elligible for the pension. furthermore they dont get much difference in terms of payments from their portfolio as those a generation younger who had very beneficial superannuation systems and didnt have superannuation as it predated the time they were working.
then when you have cops and a number of other similar occupations complaining re negative gearing about 1 property and who wont fit in to the 8 or 9 houses category that labor keeps telling us all about then it is clear that issues exist with the policies. but no we should all just listen to bill and labor about how they will assist battlers immensely especially when the former labor government and the current leader has such a gopd track record of doing this.
Baffled by UAP results - especially Herbert, it's where Townsville is located. The same Townsville that Palmer destroyed.
Big swing in Deakin - I was expecting more.
That would require a swing towards the govt, who is already minorityMinority Liberal Government by a bee's dick and QLD/NSW results, However will be truly ****** that a coalition will hinge on one nation, UAP, Nationals. We'll be an absolute dumpster fire.
Minority Liberal Government by a bee's dick and QLD/NSW results, However will be truly ****** that a coalition will hinge on one nation, UAP, Nationals. We'll be an absolute dumpster fire.
One Nation will be even more lucky to have any in the House, .
People keep saying that but talking to Sharon Lohse recently, (One Nation for Flynn), she was very bullish about her chances, especially with Nat's preference flows coming her way. I hear the same in Capricornia.
The recent polling numbers show a slump nationally, but I'm not sure it is reflected in certain seats.