- Banned
- #1,326
Phelps is not winning her seat.Katter and Phelps probably would throw their support behind them if required.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Phelps is not winning her seat.Katter and Phelps probably would throw their support behind them if required.
17% is still way behind the primary votes of both the ALP and LNP candidates. Like I said, the ON candidate would need to seriously challenge the number of first preference votes for one of the major party candidates to even have a shot - even if all of those who voted for the independents and Greens swung behind the ON candidate they still would fall short. If LNP preferenced ON it means little because there is no chance of the LNP candidate being eliminated before the final preference count with two candidates remaining.
What actually matters is who the ON voters preference.
You seem to know FAR more than I possibly ever could about the seat I live in and the general mood of the local population.
I'll leave you to your Sydney North Shore musing and will return to this after the election.
Because no-one predicted the huge primary swings to the SFF in the recent NSW election, did they?
Arrogant twat.
Apparently both sides are doing it:Just got my postal Vote forms sent to me by the LNP halfwit for Flynn and it addresses back to Party Headquarters in Archerfield not the AEC
An example of this is from the LNP candidate for Buderim. The reply paid envelope is addressed: Buderim PVA Centre, Reply Paid 87300, ARCHERFIELD BC QLD 4108
This is clearly not the address for the Electoral Commission of Queensland. Nowhere in the correspondence or the address on the envelope is it identified that voter's personal details will be returned to a political party.
It is an age-old practice of the major parties, and while not illegal, it can be confusing to voters who think they will be dealing directly with the Electoral Commission, not a Party or candidate standing for election.
https://mysunshinecoast.com.au/news...ion-to-complimentary-bbq-on-11-november,52299
Apparently both sides are doing it:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-04...idates-are-sending-postal-vote-forms/11028154
I'm not even from Sydney.
Do you want to make an account bet then? If Flynn becomes One Nation after the federal election I will never post in SRP again.
Just got my postal Vote forms sent to me by the LNP halfwit for Flynn and it addresses back to Party Headquarters in Archerfield not the AEC
An example of this is from the LNP candidate for Buderim. The reply paid envelope is addressed: Buderim PVA Centre, Reply Paid 87300, ARCHERFIELD BC QLD 4108
This is clearly not the address for the Electoral Commission of Queensland. Nowhere in the correspondence or the address on the envelope is it identified that voter's personal details will be returned to a political party.
It is an age-old practice of the major parties, and while not illegal, it can be confusing to voters who think they will be dealing directly with the Electoral Commission, not a Party or candidate standing for election.
https://mysunshinecoast.com.au/news...ion-to-complimentary-bbq-on-11-november,52299
An account bet? Are you 12?
I have never stated that Flynn would fall to ON, but I have given valid reasons for why it MAY!
The Labor candidate is a hairy arsed boy whose base is firmly in Gladstone. The Nats sitting member is Ken O'Dowd who needs a bib to catch his drooling and his lack of tangible action, for the constituency outside of Gladstone is very well noted and there is deep seated animosity towards him and the Nat's in general throughout.
Like I said, I'll revisit this after the election.
Not from Sydney? That's ok. Different city, same attitude.
Really, record youth voter enrollment and another 70k added to the rolls spells bad news for the LNP.Minority Liberal Government by a bee's dick and QLD/NSW results, However will be truly ****** that a coalition will hinge on one nation, UAP, Nationals. We'll be an absolute dumpster fire.
Really, record youth voter enrollment and another 70k added to the rolls spells bad news for the LNP.
We are at >96% and >88% in the youngest demographic. Higher than the postal survey.
Now at 10.6% of the total vote for all ages is comprised of 18-24 year olds, with 1.69 million voters and 88.8% of that demographic on the books. A number never previously considered realistic by the AEC.Would love the irony if Labor won on the back of the higher youth enrolment as a result of the SSM plebiscite - in the end, the RWNJ of the Lib Party indirectly caused their own downfall.
Sportsbet is giving me $14 for One Nation to win the seat. Eagles were longer odds for the flag during the 2018 pre-season so I suppose it's not out of the question. I just don't see where it's coming from, though. If Pauline Hanson herself was unsuccessful in her lower house tilts, why would this One Nation candidate succeed? Was there not also disaffection with the Nats at the last election?
Now at 10.6% of the total vote for all ages is comprised of 18-24 year olds, with 1.69 million voters and 88.8% of that demographic on the books. A number never previously considered realistic by the AEC.
It's mostly down to the SSM but there has been a big surge again just before this election, which is unusual.
If I was to guess, anger at the LNP and climate policy would be the major reasons. The recent climate protests may have helped motivate continued enrollment, which would more fully explain the LNPs hissy fit about "activists" leading da youf astray.
In my 54 years I have NEVER seen such anger towards the Nats. And it is very well justified.
These people will NOT vote Labor, so they'll either draw large penises on the ballot, (which bush people won't do), or vote ON, because there is no other viable candidate in the electorate.
Like I said, Sharon Lohse was quite bullish.
Would love the irony if Labor won on the back of the higher youth enrolment as a result of the SSM plebiscite - in the end, the RWNJ of the Lib Party indirectly caused their own downfall.
Think i read they've only got enough funds to run 1 candidate.SFF missing a great chance? Nats numbers held up in the vic state election btw
These people will NOT vote Labor,
In my 54 years I have NEVER seen such anger towards the Nats. And it is very well justified.
These people will NOT vote Labor, so they'll either draw large penises on the ballot, (which bush people won't do), or vote ON, because there is no other viable candidate in the electorate.
Like I said, Sharon Lohse was quite bullish.
Most polls are conducted on landlines.And some are guessing that age group doesn’t get adequately polled
And some are guessing that age group doesn’t get adequately polled
SFF missing a great chance? Nats numbers held up in the vic state election btw
Tip Labor to win by 5-8 seats but the Senate could pose problems for the new Shorten government trying to get its legislation through parliament.
Also Peter Dutton and Tony Abbott to lose their seats.
Interesting to know whom 18-24 year olds will vote for .