News ISC remain, (for this year at least).

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Nike-Sweatshops-05.jpg


Hopefully the kids make our jumpers nice and good...
 


That's 20 years old and no longer true. Nike has always outsourced production (Phil Knight came up with the idea in the 70s when the company was formed, initially reselling Asics), and during the 90s when this became "news" Nike was neither better nor worse than any of its peers at this point. The whole outsourced industry was based on the premise of “ignorance is bliss”.

Nike has released the names and locations of its factories and it audits them. It appears in the top ten of the Fortune Most Admired Companies list. Its commitment to improving its environmental impact, providing transparency about its processes, and ensuring decent working conditions in its supply chain, have turned the tide of public perception, but don't let any of that get in the way of your cool 1996 story.
 
That's 20 years old and no longer true. Nike has always outsourced production (Phil Knight came up with the idea in the 70s when the company was formed, initially reselling Asics), and during the 90s when this became "news" Nike was neither better nor worse than any of its peers at this point. The whole outsourced industry was based on the premise of “ignorance is bliss”.

Nike has released the names and locations of its factories and it audits them. It appears in the top ten of the Fortune Most Admired Companies list. Its commitment to improving its environmental impact, providing transparency about its processes, and ensuring decent working conditions in its supply chain, have turned the tide of public perception, but don't let any of that get in the way of your cool 1996 story.

That’s the company line, but they no longer allow independent auditing of their factories and there were allegations that they returned to their old ways in Vietnam and Cambodia made just last year.
 
Given that Liverpool are now set to sign a record breaking deal with Nike, my two clubs will both be with the same manufacturer. Vaguely interesting I guess.

That said, Nike's soccer uniforms are pretty bloody bland so I hope they lift their game.
 
Gets the tick of approval from me. Wouldn’t mind the 3 stripes either.

Thank good the isc and other crap brands have disappeared. Now, if we can just get Mercedes to replace the Holden centre. Holden gone the way of the tassie tiger. No point
Being sponsored by something that no longer exists.
 
Gets the tick of approval from me. Wouldn’t mind the 3 stripes either.

Thank good the isc and other crap brands have disappeared. Now, if we can just get Mercedes to replace the Holden centre. Holden gone the way of the tassie tiger. No point
Being sponsored by something that no longer exists.

The Dogs are sponsored by Mercedes, albeit Mercedes Commercial. I doubt they'd be wanting to sponsor twice over.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

For what it's worth, this thread can get mildly interesting to follow over the next couple of months:

 
For what it's worth, this thread can get mildly interesting to follow over the next couple of months:


I love looking at those threads every off season.

Fascinating reading through and seeing other people’s obsessions as they debate the tiniest of changes to the jumpers etc.

“How weird” I think to myself as I go back to posting forensic interpretations of crowd figures over on the Footy Industry board like a totally normal person.
 
The biggest sporting team in the country and still go with crap merchandise providers.

Nike is where it's at.

Would also be open to Adidas or Under Armour.
 
That’s the company line, but they no longer allow independent auditing of their factories and there were allegations that they returned to their old ways in Vietnam and Cambodia made just last year.


I like the above article as a balanced view of the situation:

"..
There are plenty of examples of the fashion industry taking advantage of workers around the world — including several deadly incidents and ongoing life-threatening conditions. Nike’s reputation for using unfair labor goes back to the 1970s, when it first moved production overseas. In the ’90s it was, “synonymous with sweatshops,” according to its own then-CEO. It was the focus of widespread protests for its use of child labor and factories with poor working conditions.

Nike has done bang-up job of reversing that image. Business of Fashion and Morgan Stanley have both hailed the company for its sustainability efforts. Nike has an entire site dedicated to its social impact with stories, stats, and pictures of happy people working in its factories. Now, by aligning itself with Kaepernick, Nike stands for a new kind of activism and has new power. And with that new power comes more responsibility. For the most part, Nike has done a good job. But there’s a glaring omission, and sustainable fashion watchdogs have noticed.

The Fashion Revolution transparency index gave Nike a 36 percent (which is higher than the average score of 21 percent) and the company received a C from the Ethical Fashion Report, who also gave it the lowest score in terms of implementing a living wage or improving wages in their factories. Sarah Ditty, the head of policy at Fashion Revolution, told the Cut that Nike scored well when it came to publishing supplier lists and setting long-term goals. However, when it came to “deeper issues” including living wages and unionization for garment workers, Nike scored 20 percent, which was just above average.
.
"
 
View attachment 756427

I would assume being a major partner currently would be for footy boots?

I liked ISC, bought one of the jackets last year.
I’m surprised if the Calabria Family wines being a major partner- traditionally the home made version had to be mixed with lemonade so it wouldn’t burn your insides.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top