Scandal Collingwood star Jordan De Goey charged with indecent assault - NO sexual jokes or inappropriate comments.

Remove this Banner Ad

NOTE: No jokes about sexual assault or the alleged victim. Keep it clean, civil and remember Jordan De Goey has only been charged at this stage and NOT found guilty of anything.
 
Last edited:


View attachment 905822

BREAKING: Collingwood star Jordan De Goey charged with sexual assault

Collingwood star Jordan De Goey has been charged with sexual assault.
Foxfooty.com.au can reveal De Goey and another 24-year-old male have been charged in relation to an incident that is alleged to have taken place in 2015.
Victoria Police delivered the following statement to foxfooty.com.au on Saturday.

“Detectives from the Sexual Crimes Squad have charged two people in relation to a reported sexual assault,” it read.
“Two 24-year-olds, one from Hampton East and one from Clematis, have both been charged with indecent assault and bailed to appear at Melbourne Magistrates‘ Court at a later date.

De Goey had 21 disposals against Essendon on Friday night. Photo: Rob Prezioso/AAP Image.Source: AAP
“The charges are in relation to an incident which is alleged to have occurred in Kew in 2015. As this matter is now before the court, police will not be making any further comment.”

Collingwood is expected to release a statement on Saturday afternoon.




'An historical incident'?

Someone has added the word 'historical' between drafts in an attempt to downplay it.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Seriously? Im not defending De Goey - innocent until proven guilty, but if guilty then he deserves jail.
Ive met De Goey and he seems fantastic bloke. Spoke to him for over an hour and one of the nicest footballers I've met.
How is the club meant to decipher who they recruit or not? Ask him before the draft if hes going to do anything wrong?
Its not the clubs fault at all. Eddie wasnt standing beside him egging him on. Its solely De Goey's fault.
You don't know what he's been accused of but you've already decided on the punishment?
 
How long would it be expected to be before a trial now? Also excuse my ignorance but aren't people often arrested when initially charged with something and then potentially bailed?
He was bailed to appear in court at a later date.
 
You don't know what he's been accused of but you've already decided on the punishment?
as far as im concerned, any form of 'sexual assault' deserves a severe punishment, considering it isnt a light offense
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I'm not only speaking about this particular incident, but there's clearly something wrong with the amount of things happening at Collingwood. De Goey has had many previous issues throughout his career.
Which means its a De Goey problem.
Every club has their players with off field issues.
Channel 7 still hire Wayne Carey and look at the stuff hes done. You need an hour to list his offenses.
 
Historical incident (2015) which was previously investigated and led to no charges laid (2018). New info come to light perhaps?
Often sexual related crimes even of the perpetrator is clearly guilty as sin (not eating De Goey is) it’s very hard to get enough evidence to prove it so it gets lost, it’s quite possible here that they were certain back then of guilt but just couldn’t get enough to take them to court but they’ve now got enough.
If he’s guilty the fact he can kick a footy better not mean he gets to stay in the AFL
 
So you have got nothing to back up your statement.

Only prior underworld involvement, sexual assault charges, a sordid history of racism including direct racist remarks from the Prez, nefarious Sunday binges during the season... and on top of that their team is rubbish again.

Not a great week for the club.
 
Exactly, and particularly in high profile cases like this, the police and dept of public prosecutions would be reluctant to go forward unless they were fairly sure of they had a case with a decent chance of winning.


BTW. When I say high profile cases, what I mean is that with other cases, they might throw one or two iffy ones into a bunch of charges so they can offer a deal ("plead guilty to X and we'll drop Y", when they knew Y was unlikely to get a conviction anyway). That strategy isn't as effective in higher profile cases because dropping those charges can be looked at very differently.
They did just prosecute a reasonably well known religious fella who according to several legal opinions including that of the high court they were never going to win.

I think the main reason to proceed with a case should be to seek justice and if the victim is willing to go forward even with a low chance of success they should go forward, but it's certainly a factor.

Hopefully the truth prevails.
 
He hasn’t been charged with shoplifting

No, but sexual assault covers a large spectrum of actions.

We dont know if it is at the lower end of the spectrum for that charge

The details will be embarrassing for him and the club but if at the lower end of the spectrum then he wont go close to jail and the club wont even think of trading him.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top