Autopsy AFL 2022 Round 19 - Dogs v Demons Sat July 23rd 7:25pm EST (Marvel)

[Outback Footy]

The Viney one was not holding the ball yet got paid. Had a while to get rid of it but got a boot to it. Not consistent at all all night how it was officiated.

And didn’t he bitch about that? Very lucky not to give 50 away I thought.

 

[Lampers]

I’m worried about Vineys form - really dropping off again

Viney has always been inconsistent. Big gaps between his truly amazing games, and his poor games.

 

[RonnieRaven]

huh? what did Jamarra actually do? got some uncontested marks in the forward 50m after an umpire error?

He kicked half of The generational ones season tally of goals in one game

 

[Fitzey]

Best bit is, we got him at a discount

Sent from my SM-N975F using Tapatalk

Yeah the old priority picks without calling them priority picks are starting to work wonders for the dogs

 

[tiger_tough]

Great game. Bont huge

 

[adogsfan5]

The Demons are the benchmark and are a wonderful side.. but how can you not be excited by JAMARAAAAAAA.

 

[compact72]

Melts aside, what a game.

High pressure, high scoring game.

Cant ask for more

Sent from my SM-N975F using Tapatalk

 

[Dogs till i die]

And didn’t he bitch about that? Very lucky not to give 50 away I thought.

You get a "reasonable" time to dispose, not a long time.

 

[Falcon3518]

Jesus Dees you had one job. Thanks for making us finish 9th. Least you clearly won’t win this year.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[Flags_In_The_Bag]

60 of them to Weightman

You do realise your small forward flops and plays for frees too right?

 

[Substance]

What a high scoring day of footy. 10 teams scored 1012 points.

 

[Farang83150]

Watch the replay, that call on gawn HTB was definitely there, grabbed the ball and tried to run, had plenty of prior.
WB run: Geelong, Freo, GWS & the Hawks, wonder if they can stay in the 8?

 

[compact72]

Yeah the old priority picks without calling them priority picks are starting to work wonders for the dogs

Lol. Melbourne supporter mentioning picks

Sent from my SM-N975F using Tapatalk

 

[compact72]

Watch the replay, that call on gawn HTB was definitely there, grabbed the ball and tried to run, had plenty of prior.
WB run: Geelong, Freo, GWS & the Hawks, wonder if they can stay in the 8?

Should be - grab the ball from the ruck and get tackled, instant htb

Sent from my SM-N975F using Tapatalk

 

[Dogs till i die]

I have mixed feelings about Weightman, I don’t like the playing for free kicks but it’s hard to hate him off the field. Really loves his footy.

Love his enthusiasm, he can spark you with a big mark or goal. Usually a straight kick for goal.

Loves life, loves footy, loves his team mates and he'll work the free kick stuff out of his game.

 

[Plugger35]

Dogs were on the end on some horrible calls. Dees rucks continually grabbing the ball from a boundary throw with incorrect disposal or HTB and not being penalised. The Johanneson HTB was a shocker, Garcia or West in the back and had his head ripped off and paid HTB. Johanneson smashed in the back of the head and no 50 metre penalty. May given a soft free on the boundary at a crucial time. The umpires continually favour the Dees and it’s sickening to watch as a neutral.. they don’t need any help, so don’t give it!

So pleased to see Gawn finally pinged in the last quarter and the dogs get up.

Pretty hard to argue that the Dogs copped a raw deal from the umpires when the free kick count was 22-13 in their favour, the Dees got a few lucky calls their way but not as many as the Dogs got.

Having said that the Dees still should have won that game with all the chances they had, they should have buried the Dogs but let them off the hook.

 

[hutchy31]

The inconsistency will inherently be there because there are three different field umpires.

I don't believe any umpires go out there and are consciously biased, however I've seen enough to be certain they are at least sub consciously (and maybe consciously in some cases) influenced by appeasing loud crowds, being lenient on star players, and being harsh on players who get a reputation for milking frees.

I can't recall ever seeing a player get away with as much as Bontempelli. It's really something else.

You should watch how these umpires looked after Petracca tonight then.

It’s not a new thing. All “star” players get looked after. Bont - yes. But also Petracca and Oliver? Yes. Selwood and Dangerfield? Yes.

Don’t pretend it’s only the other stars that get looked after. It’s disengenous. Oliver and Petracca get it too.

 

[Scythe94]

What a high scoring day of footy. 10 teams scored 1012 points.

First team to score 100 against Melbourne in 1,092 days. Credit where it's due

 

[danster168]

You don't want him to succeed.

why would I? he's a gift that the dogs should have no rights to. So not only should the dogs not have him but we should have Mac Andrew. Another example of the continued corruption by the afl to give the dogs a massive leg up.

 

[aCunningPlan]

The inconsistency will inherently be there because there are three different field umpires.

I don't believe any umpires go out there and are consciously biased, however I've seen enough to be certain they are at least sub consciously (and maybe consciously in some cases) influenced by appeasing loud crowds, being lenient on star players, and being harsh on players who get a reputation for milking frees.

I can't recall ever seeing a player get away with as much as Bontempelli. It's really something else.

I just don't get this ridiculous line of thinking. Each umpire has to go through video reviews each week and gets marked by a team of observers who call them out for every free they pay or don't pay. Make enough bad calls and you get others taking your spot on the ground, missing our on finals, etc. Mistakes certainly happen but not to the extent the average fan makes out.

 

[Sentinel]

how was the petracca tackle on bontempelli not called holding the ball? he had prior upon prior and went to go and handball and completely missed the thing. If that isn't a prime example of umpires trying to get the bulldogs over the line then I don't know what is.

The Garcia fend off and non holding the ball was just as corrupt. I don't give the dogs any credit for that win. The umps contributed about 7 goals.

 

[Lampers]

You should watch how these umpires looked after Petracca tonight then.

It’s not a new thing. All “star” players get looked after. Bont - yes. But also Petracca and Oliver? Yes. Selwood and Dangerfield? Yes.

Don’t pretend it’s only the other stars that get looked after. It’s disengenous. Oliver and Petracca get it too.

Someone’s sensitive.

 

[aCunningPlan]

Should be - grab the ball from the ruck and get tackled, instant htb

Sent from my SM-N975F using Tapatalk

That hasn't been the interpretation for quite a few years now.

 

[Sentinel]

why would I? he's a gift that the dogs should have no rights to. So not only should the dogs not have him but we should have Mac Andrew. Another example of the continued corruption by the afl to give the dogs a massive leg up.

The Dogs shouldn't have JUH but Melbourne should have Mac Andrew? Logic 101

 

[compact72]

Pretty hard to argue that the Dogs copped a raw deal from the umpires when the free kick count was 22-13 in their favour, the Dees got a few lucky calls their way but not as many as the Dogs got.

Having said that the Dees still should have won that game with all the chances they had, they should have buried the Dogs but let them off the hook.

Are you still upset about Bevo not going to the saints?

Let it go. This is some weird 6 year obsession that you have

Sent from my SM-N975F using Tapatalk