Mr Fonebone
Club Legend
too early to tell. Playing for Peel last year he did'nt look out of his depth but did not stand out either. Big guys take longerWhats everyones thoughts on him?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
too early to tell. Playing for Peel last year he did'nt look out of his depth but did not stand out either. Big guys take longerWhats everyones thoughts on him?
Haven't seen him play but he looked great at training last week. Fast, tall and a nice set of guns.Whats everyones thoughts on him?
Whats everyones thoughts on him?
Made significant improvement through the season, from what I saw and heard on Tv and radio.Whats everyones thoughts on him?
197cm, I think.From what I can tell he seemed to be tracking along fine for a first year player
He's 193 cm, would we really pick up another KPD on the rookie list with Smith on there? Retaining Vandaleur makes me think we will pick up a mid or maybe a small defender. We're not going to be in a position where we could/would want to promote 3 KPDs off the rookie list all at once at any stage next season
3, the third being Cat B rookie - Hurley the Irishman.I'm confused - including the rookie spot reserved for Tanner Smith, do we get 2 or 3 rookie selections?
Its interesting that the AFL rookie draft preview predicts most clubs targeting talls. So as much as we might want someone like a Keenan Ramsey to last to our pick, we might miss out on the 'best' of the draft slops. I wouldn't be surprised if the club selects a slightly more developed 20-25 year old tall player from a state league - that's where the big gap in our list is.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-12-02/2014-nab-afl-rookie-draft-indicative-selection-orderI'm confused - including the rookie spot reserved for Tanner Smith, do we get 2 or 3 rookie selections?
Its interesting that the AFL rookie draft preview predicts most clubs targeting talls. So as much as we might want someone like a Keenan Ramsey to last to our pick, we might miss out on the 'best' of the draft slops. I wouldn't be surprised if the club selects a slightly more developed 20-25 year old tall player from a state league - that's where the big gap in our list is.
You can probably throw Hurley in there at 197cm too.Yeah, Freo don't really need any more key position prospects.
Vanders
Smith
Pearce
Apeness
Tabs
Silvagni
In addition to veterans like Johnno, McPharlin, Pav.
How many do clubs generally have on their list?
Anything is possible, but I think we have a back-up plan to consider a 196cm 96kg defender in case that happens.Is there any risk of another team selecting Smith ahead of pick 31?
When the word is given that a delisted is to be re rookied isnt it the unwritten law he is untouchable
i remember hearing during the draft that the AFL have sent a list of delisted players who will be re-rookied to all clubs and that there players cannot be selected from this list.
but i could be wrong because it just sound like blah blah when i was waiting for our picks
That brings us to the question...do we draft Smith with our first or second pick? Surely he's more value than any kid who missed out on the national draft last week?
Is there any risk of another team selecting Smith ahead of pick 31?
Yes. Last year Richmond rookied Banfield even though Brisbane had committed to selecting him in the rookie draft
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-11-26/tigers-eye-delisted-lion
"The Lions delisted Banfield earlier this month but committed to redrafting him as a rookie, however the Tigers are believed to be keen on the small forward."
You would hope so. However when the Hawks delisted Grimley they specifically stated if he does not get selected by another team. No other re-rookie announcement has done that. So I think Grimley is available to anyone with the Hawks blessing.There'd be a gentleman's code among all clubs I suspect that delisted players intended for the rookie list aren't selected by other clubs.