- Dec 5, 2012
- 12,826
- 34,532
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Knicks, Giants
whats the bennifit of playing him over Sonsie or Mcaulife?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
whats the bennifit of playing him over Sonsie or Mcaulife?
I think clubs have seen a lot of him and see that he has stalled as a player. Caddy wasn't picked up for much the same reason. Young players who have not had a lot of exposure, were highish draft pics, suit a need etc, worth a punt, get picked up and are given a go."Not the sort of player clubs chase."
In the 2022 off season a player called Ben Long was traded from St Kilda to the Suns for pick 32.
Tom Berry went from Lions to the Suns for roughly similar value.
Tobias Bedford went from Demons where he wasn't getting a game to GWS for pick 44.
2023 Zac Fisher from Carlton to North for probably the value of pick 30 odd.
Lachie Schultz pick 34 and a future first.
Small selection from the last couple of off seasons. If those guys are being traded for those picks then there is definitely a market for Jack Graham, basically a triple flag, automatic selection, model citizen footballer.
None. Just like there wasn't for playing Kmac ahead of anyone else on a wing for the first 7 rounds.whats the bennifit of playing him over Sonsie or Mcaulife?
I think clubs have seen a lot of him and see that he has stalled as a player. Caddy wasn't picked up for much the same reason. Young players who have not had a lot of exposure, were highish draft pics, suit a need etc, worth a punt, get picked up and are given a go.
Graham I don't feel should be an automatic selection and I don't think he will be by years end. Yes model citizen and on reflection would probably get picked up, but it was more to do with the concept of playing him to raise his trade profile.
Or you could follow the general flow of the last 150 odd pages that have debated whether Graham is worth his place in the side. Generally, when that happens, the player is not long for the side because we don't debate the good to very good players.
Graham is a veteran of his position, he is at his peak age, yet he is still in the bottom 6 players in our side, for either value as a player, or value for the position he plays. He is a high half forward, that is not an essential position generally. I have noted that he was good in that position early in his career, but he has not progressed, even those like yourself who value him would concede that, and that the need to provide Dusty when on ball defensive presence is no longer needed. So he is now being measured on actual form. His 15 possession, 1 tackle game is not really making him safe. He had plenty of similar games last year as well.
I and many other posters don't need the TI seal of approval/disapproval to make an opinion valid. We've have had plenty of disagreements over the years, but I generally value his sometimes harsh assessments, because like all of us, he's sees things his way and has a right to voice that. Take what you want out of it, like all posters. I even liked our rather forthright WA college, sheesh I've forgotten his name(s), but he has disappeared.
Graham and MacIntosh, the two in the gun from posters over the last two years, (beside Ellis who you mention), were always going to stay in the side in the short term. Yze was hardly going to come in and run a line through players that have served us so well, and that's good. Hardwick was loyal to the back teeth, which made him the coach he was, but by the end he was not the same coach. So quoting coaches value things that we don't see does not wash with me. We have all been around long enough to value our own judgement, which in general is the eye test, not stats or opinion of others.
I will be surprised if Graham lasts the season. If he does it will be because he has regained real form, if so well and good. I also do not care about trading him for a higher pick because he has played all year, what message would that send. I would be surprised if Graham went for a draft pic of note, because he is not the sort of players clubs chase. He may have been a few years ago.
What has the past got to do with the future. He is a player that should have taken the bull by the horns with all our senior players injured and he hasn't. He was given a go in the midfield, and now he isn't. Sounds like a stalled player, sound bite or not."Stalled as a player" is a Kane Cornes type statement. It is saying nothing but designed to cast a shadow on the subject of the statement. A player who has been an automatic selection throughout his career including in multiple Premiership teams is not stalled. Clubs will very much trade for players who have found their ceiling, Lachie Schultz proves that. They are only interested in whether the player makes their team better, not so much what his improvement curve is, or how early he hit his ceiling.
North maybe, depth no problem. Again talking in the past regarding performance, when was the last time he played sustained good football, a while ago. Injuries, plateaued?With Graham available to clubs for nothing he will definitely be in demand as he improves the depth of any team he goes to.
Even a club like North, where there are seemingly no standards and limited leaders, when he doesn’t cost a draft pick they’d be asking themselves if someone like Graham helps their ‘club’ as a whole, and it’s a definitive yes.
And Graham has shown he can play a really important role as part of a finals / flag team, so why wouldn’t a team who sees themselves a contender secure Graham, who can help them at the pointy end as a complimentary player to more attacking mids or flankers?
Graham isn’t going to cost a club draft collateral, and won’t cost a bomb (3-years on $450k / season probably secures him).
So whilst Graham helps us to an extent, an end of second round pick as compensation helps us more given the stage of our list build.
Time will tell, but I’ll be staggered if Graham doesn’t have multiple suitors given he’s a free agent and comes as a very low risk acquisition.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
NONEwhats the bennifit of playing him over Sonsie or Mcaulife?
Well Sonsie is a mid, but plenty of others aren't.I mean we did play Sonsie is his position and Sonsie struggled until he was dropped
Sonsie isn't a forward.I mean we did play Sonsie is his position and Sonsie struggled until he was dropped
None that I can see.whats the bennifit of playing him over Sonsie or Mcaulife?
Except Sonsie isn't a forward. Play him as a midfielder for a few games and see how he goes.I mean we did play Sonsie is his position and Sonsie struggled until he was dropped
I think we'll find out this week. Not sure MacAuliffe will play, hasn't played much footy of late so would be a tough ask.Except Sonsie isn't a forward. Play him as a midfielder for a few games and see how he goes.
Yeah, I don't know whether he'll come back yet either. I'll be amazed if Sonsie doesn't come in.I think we'll find out this week. Not sure MacAuliffe will play, hasn't played much footy of late so would be a tough ask.
Who has?Well he's done a hammy at training this week so he's out.
JGTIWho has?
Spoil sportJGTI
You joined an argument late, provided a whole heap of off topic dribble relating to form, tried to pass it off as evidence of the topic at hand despite it being kinda weird and now throwing your toys out of the cot?
I and others provided evidence, but TI provided none but I reckon you know that and are just trying to get TI to ask you out for a romantic dinner or something?
You should go back to bagging Dan Rioli as being one of the worst defenders in the game, that was some of your best work