GG. Too classy and took your chances when they came. See you in seven weeks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 9
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
GG. Too classy and took your chances when they came. See you in seven weeks.
They do seem capable of playing at a high level this year, but can they sustain it for 3-4 weeks of finals against the best teams in the league? They're in a really interesting spot right now where their list is getting tested due to injuries and have still found a way to perform really well against arguably the two best teams in the league over the last fortnight. So what does that mean?Can absolutely win the premiership. I hate saying that and ive ribbed the Blues for a few years but it scares the s**t outta me that they absolutely can win #17.
We need players to stay on the park to build cohesion. Our systems are all out of wack at the moment with a revolving door of ins and outs. Was shown in the Geelong game with our defensive structures falling apart as bad as they have since Voss took over.They do seem capable of playing at a high level this year, but can they sustain it for 3-4 weeks of finals against the best teams in the league? They're in a really interesting spot right now where their list is getting tested due to injuries and have still found a way to perform really well against arguably the two best teams in the league over the last fortnight. So what does that mean?
It kind of depends on how you want to look at it. An optimist might say they beat the flag favourites two weeks ago, played really well against another flag fancy Geelong last week and a win tomorrow night over the reigning premiers Collingwood should get them back into the top 4 as well as capping off a really strong three weeks for the Blues. Then a pessimist would probably say Carlton have lost two of their last three games (arguably could/should have been three of the last four with the way the Fremantle game ended) and a loss to Collingwood tomorrow night means three losses in their last four games as well as putting the Blues at risk of falling out of the top 8 at the conclusion of this round.
The truth is likely somewhere in the middle of those two extremes, but you get the point that there's a bit of unknown about exactly where Carlton currently stand in the league and it mostly depends on how you choose to view their recent form. They've shown some seriously good football in the last two games and we all assume they're a top 4 side right now but you still have to secure wins at the end of the day. Particularly given their next three opponents are all serious football clubs in Collingwood, Melbourne and Sydney.
IMO they need to get back into the habit of consistently winning again. Otherwise, questions will rightly start popping up.
In an ideal world, absolutely agree with you. Unfortunately, the realistic nature of this league means that every club will have to deal with injuries to some degree throughout the duration of a season. Carlton is going to have more injuries this season just like every other club will. So the point about cohesion being interrupted literally applies to every club.We need players to stay on the park to build cohesion. Our systems are all out of wack at the moment with a revolving door of ins and outs. Was shown in the Geelong game with our defensive structures falling apart as bad as they have since Voss took over.
Amount of best 22 missing does matter for sure, but not all injury lists are the same.In an ideal world, absolutely agree with you. Unfortunately, the realistic nature of this league means that every club will have to deal with injuries to some degree throughout the duration of a season. Carlton is going to have more injuries this season just like every other club will. So the point about cohesion being interrupted literally applies to every club.
Do Carlton have more injuries than most other clubs? It would appear so but that will change as the season rolls on. Regardless, Vossy has to find ways to win in spite of the injuries. That's the sign of a truly good team that's able to adjust when the uncontrollable variables inevitably change.
We'll find out tonight if Vossy can continue to find ways to remain highly competitive with an injury depleted list.
There's so many laughs in this post it's almost hard to read have you ever actually watched Carlton games?Amount of best 22 missing does matter for sure, but not all injury lists are the same.
I'd argue that most sides missing their best two midfielders or key forwards would suffer more than Carlton missing their B-cast set of forward pockets/flankers, a couple of good back flankers and their second best KPD. Whereas Geelong missing Stengle, Miers, Close and O.Henry would quite obviously hurt them a lot.
Sides get crippled when these sub-sections are missing multiple good players or top liners:
-Midfielders (most important)
-KPFs
-KPDs
-Rebounding flankers
-General/small/mobile forwards
And I'd throw primary ruckman on there too, for those sides who lack two quality ones (e.g Melbourne with Gawn, or Sydney with Grundy).
You can argue that missing both Saad and Docherty creates one of those deleterious situations, despite having Newman and Williams as strong rebounders. Add Newman or Williams to the injured players list and there you go, rebound probably reaches breaking point.
Gov is their sole quality key position player missing. Throw Weitering on top and its crippling. Weitering by himself (like the first two rounds) could even be considered crippling. Gov, not quite at that level.
They have a deep midfield that can survive without one of Cripps/Walsh/Cerra/Hewett. Two or more and yes, their midfield would be taking a hit.
The ruck situation is strong with Pittonet, TDK or both. No issues there.
None of the missing forwards are good enough to make a difference more than marginal. It sounds harsh but it's just the way it is.
Ultimately if Carlton got everybody back but then lost McKay and Curnow, or even any combination of two A grade players from the ones currently playing, it would present more of a challenge. The challenge they have right now is workable and they are bringing 4 players back into the line up - 3 of which were injured - this week.
Very happy to entertain rather than annoy you (just so that you're aware, it's the latter situation that seems much more obvious)! I have watched my fair share of the Blues under Vossy, as I did the previous few iterations.There's so many laughs in this post it's almost hard to read have you ever actually watched Carlton games?
Please stop commenting on our current injury issues, it's clear as day from this that you have absolutely no understanding of our list or best 22 structures.
Clearly with a blindfold onI have watched my fair share of the Blues under Vossy, as I did the previous few iterations.
From the ones bolded - to return in 2024 after tonight are Martin, Gov, Saad and Fog. An A grader and 3 decent role players.Yes some may not come in. The ones certain if fit are Martin, Cerra, McGovern, Saad, Docherty (though not this year) and Fog.
Motlop would need to show more in the VFL, Kemp is ahead of Marchbank for me now, Cuningham offers less than Elijah Hollands and JSOS out of the year is fringe.
The wit! The candour! The imagery!Clearly with a blindfold on
Spare me the grandiloquent jargon and please go watch some football before acting like an arbiter on all things Carlton relatedThe wit! The candour! The imagery!
I'm struggling to keep up with a Mensa candidate of this intellectual supremacy. Are we able to slow things down a bit? I'd love to learn exactly what I'm seeing when i watch Carlton play.
Yeah, you've caught me out. I haven't actually watched any footy this year, or other years. Commenting is more like a pointless hobby.Spare me the grandiloquent jargon and please go watch some football before acting like an arbiter on all things Carlton related
So what you’re saying is - unless they consistently win, questions will be asked if they can consistently win.They do seem capable of playing at a high level this year, but can they sustain it for 3-4 weeks of finals against the best teams in the league? They're in a really interesting spot right now where their list is getting tested due to injuries and have still found a way to perform really well against arguably the two best teams in the league over the last fortnight. So what does that mean?
It kind of depends on how you want to look at it. An optimist might say they beat the flag favourites two weeks ago, played really well against another flag fancy Geelong last week and a win tomorrow night over the reigning premiers Collingwood should get them back into the top 4 as well as capping off a really strong three weeks for the Blues. Then a pessimist would probably say Carlton have lost two of their last three games (arguably could/should have been three of the last four with the way the Fremantle game ended) and a loss to Collingwood tomorrow night means three losses in their last four games as well as putting the Blues at risk of falling out of the top 8 at the conclusion of this round.
The truth is likely somewhere in the middle of those two extremes, but you get the point that there's a bit of unknown about exactly where Carlton currently stand in the league and it mostly depends on how you choose to view their recent form. They've shown some seriously good football in the last two games and we all assume they're a top 4 side right now but you still have to secure wins at the end of the day. Particularly given their next three opponents are all serious football clubs in Collingwood, Melbourne and Sydney.
IMO they need to get back into the habit of consistently winning again. Otherwise, questions will rightly start popping up.
Sounds like the archetypical Cats fans tbh.Yeah, you've caught me out. I haven't actually watched any footy this year, or other years. Commenting is more like a pointless hobby.
I think Gov and Saad will be important returnees. Quite a few sides are missing a couple of important players like that though. But yes, losing them is still better than losing your ruck system, Weitering, McKay, Curnow, Cripps or Walsh. Doch is not worth talking about in terms of Carlton winning the premiership in 2024. It is right on the fringe of having a huge impact, but absolutely workable and hence cop outs do not fly (Voss absolutely agrees with me and disagrees with you, but he has quite an astute footy mind). If Weitering or Newman was missing too, that would be the tipping point.Sounds like the archetypical Cats fans tbh.
So far your argument has consisted of; Carlton aren't missing any key players because you don't rate most of them, despite dozens of Blues fans explaining to you why they are critical members of our best 22 and how they effect our team structures.
You have McGovern referred to as just a 2nd KPD who we have cover for despite him arguably being our best rebounder these days. Docherty and Saad paired together as 'rebounders' despite Docherty playing half forward and midfield for the good part of a year now. Our small forwards, apparently none are worth noting because you decided it to be the case and you also note Walsh as our 2nd 'contested bull'... Walsh who's our first receiver at stoppage and rarely, if ever, is the one at the bottom of the contest dishing the ball out. That would be Hewett or Kennedy.
So I apologize if I've resorted to 4th grade tactics, to me it's clear you simply have no clue what you're talking about when discussing our list.
But please carry on if you'd like, just don't expect our supporters to take kindly to your misinformed posts.
Fair play campaigner."Not taking too kindly?" You just said you were highly entertained and having a great time.
Did you even read the post you quoted? This is literally the first sentence - They do seem capable of playing at a high level this year, but can they sustain it for 3-4 weeks of finals against the best teams in the league?So what you’re saying is - unless they consistently win, questions will be asked if they can consistently win.
Deep.
The bottom half a dozen players in their 22 resemble the putties in Power Rangers. Completely useless.