1.Tippett
2.Knights
3.Dangerfield
Heard from more than one source... Not revealing on BF for obvious reasons
2.Knights
3.Dangerfield
Heard from more than one source... Not revealing on BF for obvious reasons
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If true.1.Tippett
2.Knights
3.Dangerfield
Heard from more than one source... Not revealing on BF for obvious reasons
Not that I am disagreeing with you, but isnt he on 550K as we speak
I doubt it very much considering he re-signed his contract at the end of 2010.
I certainly haven't heard anything like this.
The threat for Dangerfield wasnt Gold Coast, or GWS.
It was Essendon. They made a very big offer to him, and from what Ive heard he was far closer to taking it than most would know.
1.Tippett
2.Knights
3.Dangerfield
Heard from more than one source... Not revealing on BF for obvious reasons
1.Tippett
2.Knights
3.Dangerfield
Heard from more than one source... Not revealing on BF for obvious reasons
When was the last time a marquee player signed on in February with a poorly performing club?
Ryan GriffenWhen was the last time a marquee player signed on in February with a poorly performing club?
This is just as big a worry to me as DangerWith that in mind, what is Rory Sloanes contract status???
This is the other thing that concerns me. Not only are we losing much needed interstate born players every year we are also paying well above market value to retain intestaters. Surely this is going to cause an imbalance in our list at some stage. Strong clubs are suffering salary cap pressures because they are trying to keep premiership lists together or retain proven players. We will suffer salary cap problems because we are just trying to keep unproven players from going home.
Based on last years performance Danger, Tippett or Knights shouldn't be receiving anymore than $350-$400k.
Griffen and Goldy have established thier roles in the side.
Patty would be stupid to sign now when he does not even know how his new coach will use him. Or how effective he may or may not be in the Sando game plan.
How many of you would re-sign an employment contract 9 months before it is due if you dont know what your actual role or how much you are worth to the company yet?I am confident he will stay. It seems to me that the players the media try to "ship off" stay, and the quiet ones leave....Tip/Bock...Walker/Davis.........
No one in the media saw Gunston wanting to leave a couple of days before BnF night, and Armstrong was on AA late in the season saying he was thankfull to get a game and waiting to be asked to sign on.
With that in mind, what is Rory Sloanes contract status???
This is just as big a worry to me as Danger
Nar.He is definately considered a Geelong boy by the GFC and it supporters. Most are expecting that Geelong will have a serious crack at Dangerfield at the end of this season. To be honest if Danger lives up to anywhere near his potential this year Geelong will need to give up plenty to get him. Menzel?
So Dangermouse, Delidio etc are hanging out for what? To go to a team with a greater chance of winning finals. And which teams in this situation have plenty of room in their salary cap? Colingwood, Hawthorn. Carlton? Probably not. So they must be looking at Geelong ( an ageing team on the decline), St Kilda (surely not). So why would they leave their current team?
My guess is that we will start seeing him in TV ads pretty soon, promoting Fasta Pasta or something like that. Get those endorsements happening.