Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What???
You mean here #2,416?
You did no such thing.
You said if you extrapolated the percentage of victories in away games for those years you would have made the finals. That's an entirely different thing to being on the road (in the air) each week and making the finals in real life.
See what I mean about lies and damn statistics?
Oh and in case you don't understand because I didn't include a gif or pic (as you lamented in #2,509) - here ya go.
View attachment 961618
You're welcome.
sorry but the use of the word ‘percentage’ means that’s exactly what I said, for anyone that has the most remote idea of comprehension.
View attachment 961780
Is that really the best you can do?
We all know what the word percentage means, it's your bankrupt argument that makes no sense in the real world.
If only you had an ounce of humility within you. Then you'd be able to admit you were wrong, but since you never do, you obviously don't.
This whole thread is just people making baseless blanket assumptions, nothing we say can change their view and they're going to actively try to poke holes using semantics in anything you say. The whole thing is a thinly veiled troll thread which is why it only gets bumped when the Cats lose a game.Oh I'm sorry did i not fill out a 400-page stat dec form to stipulate exactly what period I was talking about in order to specify that we aren't talking about their figures in the VFA era, or the period before we actually remembered how to play - which co-incides with when critics have accused us of only making the finals based on our 'cheat ground.'?
Do i need to post an essay each time just so the people who can't follow a fairly straightforward linear argument are certain of the exact parameters of what I am talking about, lest I be told that I've 'lost'?
Oh I'm sorry did i not fill out a 400-page stat dec form to stipulate exactly what period I was talking about in order to specify that we aren't talking about their figures in the VFA era, or the period before we actually remembered how to play - which co-incides with when critics have accused us of only making the finals based on our 'cheat ground.'?
Do i need to post an essay each time just so the people who can't follow a fairly straightforward linear argument are certain of the exact parameters of what I am talking about, lest I be told that I've 'lost'?
Whatever blows your hair back dude. I don't care enough about it to keep going around in circles with you.
The overall message I was trying to convey in my first post in this thread (#2,445) was to say that Geelong should do better in finals this year because of the reasons I outlined. Why Geelong fans have jumped down my throat about what was initially a positive message is beyond me.
View attachment 962237
I had a feeling this thread would pop back up. It’s become mental, they have a severe case of the finals yips. SO much high end talent, not translating to ultimate success. It’s kinda sad, really.Since 2011 flag:
6x Top 4 finishes in nine years. That is an amazing run over a long period.
Now 4-12 in finals
Something not quite right about it
I had a feeling this thread would pop back up. It’s become mental, they have a severe case of the finals yips. SO much high end talent, not translating to ultimate success. It’s kinda sad, really.
Definitely mental and the club just cannot get over it ,it seems.I had a feeling this thread would pop back up. It’s become mental, they have a severe case of the finals yips. SO much high end talent, not translating to ultimate success. It’s kinda sad, really.
Err...not many. Just their players, coaches, staff, supporters and an entire town of 150,000 people...Who's sad about it?
I had a feeling this thread would pop back up. It’s become mental, they have a severe case of the finals yips. SO much high end talent, not translating to ultimate success. It’s kinda sad, really.
Since 2011 flag:
6x Top 4 finishes in nine years. That is an amazing run over a long period.
Now 4-12 in finals
Something not quite right about it
Since Hawkins kicked 0.5, I don't think he had a lack of supportI think it comes down to two problems:
* Lack of support for Hawkins. Their small forwards tend to be inconsistent and they don't have a real second tall. Kind of hurts them as too much pressure is on him, and it showed tonight.
* Too methodical ball movement. Against the weaker clubs it holds up well enough but against the good clubs it seems a bit too easy to break down through absorbing I50 pressure and fast rebounds the other way.
I wonder if there's also a mental block there.
I wonder if there's also a mental block there.
They lack of a genuine 2nd tall is hurting them come finals time. They rely on danger to be that player but he also needed in the midfield to even up the midfield battle. Speaking of they lack a bull inside mid. This is probably why they chased Crouch.I think it comes down to two problems:
* Lack of support for Hawkins. Their small forwards tend to be inconsistent and they don't have a real second tall. Kind of hurts them as too much pressure is on him, and it showed tonight.
* Too methodical ball movement. Against the weaker clubs it holds up well enough but against the good clubs it seems a bit too easy to break down through absorbing I50 pressure and fast rebounds the other way.
I wonder if there's also a mental block there.
I think it comes down to two problems:
* Lack of support for Hawkins. Their small forwards tend to be inconsistent and they don't have a real second tall. Kind of hurts them as too much pressure is on him, and it showed tonight.
* Too methodical ball movement. Against the weaker clubs it holds up well enough but against the good clubs it seems a bit too easy to break down through absorbing I50 pressure and fast rebounds the other way.
I wonder if there's also a mental block there.
Nailed itI think it comes down to two problems:
* Lack of support for Hawkins. Their small forwards tend to be inconsistent and they don't have a real second tall. Kind of hurts them as too much pressure is on him, and it showed tonight.
* Too methodical ball movement. Against the weaker clubs it holds up well enough but against the good clubs it seems a bit too easy to break down through absorbing I50 pressure and fast rebounds the other way.
I wonder if there's also a mental block there.