Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can see by the posters commenting that he is kicking arse.Have you missed the last three hours?
Now it is lying time, Brandis style.
Nah, just responding to you and your predictable analysis but I do take back the lying part, he is just rambling and has no idea what he is saying but the muppets from the right keep supporting him which makes great watching.I can see by the posters commenting that he is kicking arse.
Brandis is reaming the SG live for all of you to see. Take your blinkers off and listen.
You "brain scientist"Maybe the solicitor-general needs to resign. If he can't get over his ego and work with the governor-general, he might be the one who is the problem!
It is all about definition - Consultation."How many times have you appeared before the High Court as a QC".
Brandis: umm errr, waffle waffle None. Became a QC after I entered parliament.
Says it all really.
Barnaby was admiring her shoes, thinking how much Christopher Pyne would love them for Xmas.It is all about definition - Consultation.
What a shame for those of you that can remember, Steve Wizard and his show Fast Forward is not on the air.
Wealth of material yesterday.
We need someone like Samantha Bee (SBS Full Frontal).
As an aside, was watching Barnaby when Kelly Dwyer went to the podium to speak, didn't realise he is a legs man. Watched her all the way. Very funny.
Before, anyone takes offence - no harm in appreciating legs. He is not Trump.
Think you need to read the transcript or have watched it live, answers were very brief. He had to either respond as he did or make no comment.and people don't have a problem with Gleason divulging his discussions with Brandis to Dreyfus, nice to see legal confidentiality been maintained!! In fact why is the Solicitor General even discussing anything with the Shadow Attorney spokesperson. In fact I'd be disappointed if the heads of any public service worked with any opposition no matter who the party.
and people don't have a problem with Gleason divulging his discussions with Brandis to Dreyfus, nice to see legal confidentiality been maintained!! In fact why is the Solicitor General even discussing anything with the Shadow Attorney spokesperson. In fact I'd be disappointed if the heads of any public service worked with any opposition no matter who the party.
If you're thinking of a lawyer's legal obligations to their client, that doesn't apply here.and people don't have a problem with Gleason divulging his discussions with Brandis to Dreyfus, nice to see legal confidentiality been maintained!! In fact why is the Solicitor General even discussing anything with the Shadow Attorney spokesperson. In fact I'd be disappointed if the heads of any public service worked with any opposition no matter who the party.
Brandis is not Gleason's client.and people don't have a problem with Gleason divulging his discussions with Brandis to Dreyfus, nice to see legal confidentiality been maintained!! In fact why is the Solicitor General even discussing anything with the Shadow Attorney spokesperson. In fact I'd be disappointed if the heads of any public service worked with any opposition no matter who the party.
This is an internet forum where I can express whatever opinion I like, whether I'm an expert on the subject or not.
and people don't have a problem with Gleason divulging his discussions with Brandis to Dreyfus, nice to see legal confidentiality been maintained!! In fact why is the Solicitor General even discussing anything with the Shadow Attorney spokesperson. In fact I'd be disappointed if the heads of any public service worked with any opposition no matter who the party.