- May 2, 2015
- 1,402
- 4,505
- AFL Club
- Carlton
I think he is legitimately a chance to win 5 Brownlows. He's that good.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Says the king of hypocrisyI'm not engaging in this discussion.
You've shown your cards, and the term for it is 'hypocritical'.
"The ABC is Australia's most trusted source for news and information. For more than 90 years it has ensured audiences are informed and educated with impartial coverage..."Now that he has won the prestigious ABC best player award, it's the skies the limit from here on in. Have they updated Wiki yet ?
Well, that confirms it. Daicos wins the only unarguable award within AFL circles."The ABC is Australia's most trusted source for news and information. For more than 90 years it has ensured audiences are informed and educated with impartial coverage..."
Seems pretty unarguable when you look at that.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Or if as you pointed out Voss didn't rig it by not giving him the votes he deserved in that game.Wins the coaches award by 4 votes... Imagine if Flybagger didn't give him a charity 5 voter vs the Blues.
Wins the coaches award by 4 votes... Imagine if Flybagger didn't give him a charity 5 voter vs the Blues.
Disgraceful stuffAnd doesn’t even rank in the Top 3 of the Players MVP award. LOL
Probably don't respect the squibs they see him do out on the fieldWonder why Nick never gets nominated by his peers as a finalist for MVP? I think last season he didn’t even get nominated as one of the 3 options in his own club. I think it says a lot about his impact.……more sizzle than sausage you’d imagine.
Cripps 0/2 so far. Hopefully he can win the Brownlow so the Blosers have something to celebrate after all they’ve worked forSo many offended Blues fans in here. It's so good to see that a 21 yr old pisses so many people off.
Leigh Matthews Trophy (MVP)And doesn’t even rank in the Top 3 of the Players MVP award. LOL
Cripps 0/2 so far. Hopefully he can win the Brownlow so the Blosers have something to celebrate after all they’ve worked for
I think he is legitimately a chance to win 5 Brownlows. He's that good.
Walsh came 2nd when he was 21...Leigh Matthews Trophy (MVP)
1. Marcus Bontempelli
2. Patrick Cripps
3. Isaac Heeney
4. Nick Daicos
5. Jesse Hogan
2 x 29 year olds
2 x 28 year olds
1 x 21 year old
Yep, he’s such a LOL player. Give me a spell
Can you walk me through how you got those numbers?Just to take this theory to its extreme. Lets assume Fly is rorting the system. Lets assume he is inflating Daicos's games and awarding votes he doesnt deserve every chance he gets. Lets assume that in any match where Daicos votes its the least possible amount of votes he gets from one coach is what he really deserves and wherever this occurs its the opposition coach giving Daicos the lesser amount (even where the alternative is another Collingwood player) because we know McRae is cheating every chance he gets.
I think that sums up the postulation a good number of posters are going at, all be it in the above senario McRae is going full rort.
Now lets look at the games where Daicos has got votes and what the possible break down is
Round Zero 2-0
Round One 4-1 or 3-2
Round Three 3-2
Round Six 5-3
Round Eight 5-5
Round Nine 5-5
Round Ten 5-5
Round Eleven 5-4
Round Twelve 4-4
Round Fourteen 5-2
Round Sixteen 5-3 or 4-4
Round Seventeen 2-0
So lets makes the real Daicos votes those which are the lower amount in any game, the ones we "know" the oppo coach gave and then remove the cheating Fly additional votes.
That would take away the following votes starting at round zero 2,2,1,2,0,0,0,1,0,3,2,2. Where there are two possible combos I have assumed the bigger margin cause Fly we know wanted to cheat as much as possible.
Thats 15 votes, so now we know Nick should be on 69 votes not 84. If Fly wasnt so crooked then Neale and Gulden would be ahead of Nick by 2 votes and Warner only 1 behind.
Still that doesn't seem right because we know Nick shouldnt be rated anywhere near those 3 let alone the big guns up ahead.
I reckon there is an additional subterfuge going on here. I reckon Fly is slinging some of the other coaches to bump up Nick. Otherwise how could he get so many undeserved votes. Once I have worked out who are the dirty coaches I will start on whose paying the umps.
And did people sit here slandering him for that? Or most likely people were applauding a great achievement.Walsh came 2nd when he was 21...
Oh my
Yes, they did actuallyAnd did people sit here slandering him for that? Or most likely people were applauding a great achievement.
Probably time to grow up a bit boys.
And FWIW Daicos came 2nd when he was 20Walsh came 2nd when he was 21...
Oh my






