Vdubs
Hall of Famer
Any chance there are none?Feeling more confident with that line up. Any chance of a late change?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Any chance there are none?Feeling more confident with that line up. Any chance of a late change?
Great on paper.Feeling more confident with that line up. Any chance of a late change?
It certainly will. If even three of the six are "on" it will be a nightmare for defences.That forward line up is going to cause some serious opposition headaches.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
I've said since the start with this type of foot issue post-surgery it's really not a matter of how cautious to manage it. He'll either pass all the tests or not, all dependent on recovery which (so far) has exceeded expectations. If you recover a month quicker you don't sit out just because initially you were anticipating a round 4 return.Parfitt sub as i predicted not great signs for his spot long term (although no doubt he plays next week with a 6 day break as we will rest guys) but probably the right call-not enough midfield gametime for him.
Big game for sav need him to stand up under pressure.
Im still not convinced hawkins will play it would be unlike us to risk him imo.
Hawkins has carried niggles or had limited pre seasons many a time. Very, very rarely doesn't perform well. The attention he draws helps all of the others anyway.Great on paper.
Hawk is very underdone.
Holmes had a hammy, we are told.
Hoping no calls for the midwife tomorrow.
We'll see. Don't want to count our chickens just yetTanner Bruhn named in the middle where the old Captain would've been, what an honor for that young fella. Fantastic trading by Mackie there.
We'll see. Don't want to count our chickens just yet
There's always a couple of these blokes. Trent West in 2011. Byrnes/Blake in 2009. Our depth last year was not near our other Premiership years.I just don't understand how you can have O'Connor in the backline, 2E banned in the centre, and Parfitt as an emergency/sub... Here's to another year of being constantly perplexed by O'Connor's inclusion, the man has been carried to some serious success.
Sort of i think its more they decided to hold him over for next week as we have a 6 day break to carlton better to bring him in fresh than 2 games in a short time.
Last year you also didn't understand Scott's "obsolete game plan", Parfitt's exclusion and the use of "slow utility types" in Blicavs, Kolo, Smith, Duncan, Zuthrie, Touhy, Henry and Stewart. Also that Ceglar had gone past Stanley.I just don't understand how you can have O'Connor in the backline, 2E banned in the centre, and Parfitt as an emergency/sub... Here's to another year of being constantly perplexed by O'Connor's inclusion, the man has been carried to some serious success.
Fairly confident we’ll win, I suspect a very high pressure contest but we have more firepower than the Pies and that will hold us in good stead. Watch for 50k peanuts booing the crap out of Ollie, I hope he kicks 5 and shuts them up.
To be fair other than moc over parfitt (and no kolo has probably forced that) the rest was fairly likely. But well done.
Thanks for raining on my parade
Tanner Bruhn named in the middle where the old Captain would've been, what an honor for that young fella. Fantastic trading by Mackie there.
Great on paper.
Hawk is very underdone.
Holmes had a hammy, we are told.
Hoping no calls for the midwife tomorrow.
Did you pick the 22? If so well done.. who is your pick as the sub?
The Hawkins selection doesn't sit well with me. Such a long season etc etc. Would we have played Danger or Joel of his prep last year? Im not sure we would.
More than anything ..it just seems to resonate we have no backup for him ... and Hawk is the oldest player on our list. All good if it works out but if he is not ready and we lose him mid season or something .. then not great.
I might be just Nervy nelly but it seems like they do not want to play ..with no Hawk.. and maybe no Cameron if he gets a call.
This. Doubting the medicos at this point is kinda pointless. There's just no reason anybody would risk him in the first round, so the only reasonable explanation is that he's not in a position of risk. I could even imagine with someone like Hawk that the coaches advise him before the game something along the lines of "Getting K's into your foot is the best thing, but you don't need to overdo it etc".The GF for me settles the debate on the coaches making the hard calls. I have absolutely no doubt that unless Hawkins has ticked all the boxes theres no way he is in the team. If Hawk gave them even 0.001% doubt he would be on ice.
We have no idea what level he is training at what capacity the foot is at. They'll only play him if it's 100% safe to do so and there is no benefit to a further week or two of rest. They clearly managed the workloads of the older boys last season as they went on according to the numbers and how they pulled up. If Hawkins plays, he's ready. If he's a late out, he didn't pass the tests. Simple as that.The Hawkins selection doesn't sit well with me. Such a long season etc etc. Would we have played Danger or Joel of his prep last year? Im not sure we would.
More than anything ..it just seems to resonate we have no backup for him ... and Hawk is the oldest player on our list. All good if it works out but if he is not ready and we lose him mid season or something .. then not great.
I might be just Nervy nelly but it seems like they do not want to play ..with no Hawk.. and maybe no Cameron if he gets a call.
Exactly. And there is still a chance that for whatever reason today in his last minute tests he pulls up lame (but hasn't so far). But he'll only not be played if there is a red flag of that variety. They aren't sitting there going "hmm I think he's 80% good to go" and Scotty goes "okay let's risk it". It's ridiculous to think this is how people view the medical staff/MC relationship. Pointless to take the role of armchair experts on injuries where we know 5% of the detail at best.This. Doubting the medicos at this point is kinda pointless. There's just no reason anybody would risk him in the first round, so the only reasonable explanation is that he's not in a position of risk. I could even imagine with someone like Hawk that the coaches advise him before the game something along the lines of "Getting K's into your foot is the best thing, but you don't need to overdo it etc".
I mean Bowes is an example already, people suggesting he could have played today but they aren't 100% sure on him and he probably plays next week.