- Apr 21, 2018
- 17,075
- 21,905
- AFL Club
- Carlton
The blank wall with light ladder going up and the light switch. Probably tough as nails in the sheds.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep - and he's developed some very bad habits that could cost the team plenty this weekend.Jesus… he’s only played a few games. Stop being so critical
Exactly. Chews up time gets his 15secs on camera and long bomb pretty much every time anyway. Will be a good player but better options right now.Might be far-fetched, but it's IMHO, Fahey is trying to play a bit like Scott Pendlebury.
The pauses, not running at full pelt, looking upfield and the optimistic precision kick.
Pendlebury can do it, though.
I think the key role Keefe is playing is providing a contest forward of the ball. Obviously he has a chop out in the ruck which is handy, but as a forward, he rarely gets beaten in the air. It brings the smalls into the gameI understand the structural role that Lachie Keeffe plays in the side but I’m still not convinced there’s a net benefit in playing him. He has played most of the year as a forward/ruck chop out but hasn’t kicked a single goal.
I’d prefer to see O’Halloran take that spot as a high half forward/mid and bring even more pressure to the forward line.
Briggs is playing 80%+ game time so surely between HH, Riccardi and Brown they can chop out for the other 20%.
In: O’Halloran, Callaghan (if fit)
Out: Fahey, Keeffe
Sub one of Angwin, Haynes or Fahey.
Watch out .... we got a badass over hereYep - and he's developed some very bad habits that could cost the team plenty this weekend.
I'm just saying who he reminds me of.
I can be as critical as I like based on evidence.
Don't need you to tell me to stop.
Too much time in Section 226...it changes a man...Watch out .... we got a badass over here
And perhaps the week after as well if results pan that wayGiants thread has always been friendly to oppo but we are enemies next game.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
The dogs have won 4 of their last 12 or something and got rolled by 16th and 18th in consecutive weeks. Dogs are no sure things against anyone
We will have to win, the geriatric pussies aren’t doing us any favours laying down to the dirty dogs.
The dogs have won 4 of their last 12 or something and got rolled by 16th and 18th in consecutive weeks. Dogs are no sure things against anyone
There is definitely some internal turmoil over there and it seems a section or even majority of the team want the coach gone, that is our best hope. Geelong will be heavily undermanned.The dogs have won 4 of their last 12 or something and got rolled by 16th and 18th in consecutive weeks. Dogs are no sure things against anyone
He's got a point. If we can't discuss pros and cons/development opportunities of players, even if they've only played a few games, then it's not a discussion forum - it's just an echo chamber.Watch out .... we got a badass over here
Come on we are allowed to have opinions that aren’t “club is awesome everything they do is right and all our players are AA”.Watch out .... we got a badass over here
He shows some flashes of brilliance with his kicks and positioning on the defensive wing. Just needs to work on his vision when moving up the field.Fahey looks very raw to me, he has some really good attributes but sometimes it almost looks like he’s playing school footy and that he’s a little careless.
He’s only young and I think he’s lucky to be in such a good environment where he will continue to improve. I love his agility and he can really give it a roost, just need to tighten up his defensive areas, strengthen up his body and he can be a nice point of difference.
Yep understand those benefits, just think XO would offer more value overall.IMHO, I think Keefe is a vital cog in the 'structure'.
Allows HH, Brown and Riccardi to focus on their normal roles without the risk of being beaten up in the ruck.
He's not a good kick, has no pace, but some of his work is really unsung.
That tap to McMullin for his first goal was brilliant. At the ground, you could see Keefe and McMullin having a quick chat before the ball-up. They were concocting something, and it worked.
I just think Keefe does a lot of stuff that stats don't reflect.
They offer completely different things though. They arent the same player. LLoyd and XO are playing the same role... I could see that comparison.Yep understand those benefits, just think XO would offer more value overall.
Carlton have a much tougher midfield than Essendon, so another bullish mid who also goes forward and kicks goals would be valuable.
Are you referring to me? If so you may be confused… I was talking about being overly critical of a player whose played a handful of games… people saying “Fahey thinks he is Scott Pendulebury” is some of the biggest nonsense that’s been posted on here.My last comment over this issue - we can agree and disagree - it's a forum for discussion.
But a non-moderator publicly telling another poster to 'stop' goes over the line and is something I will not put up with.
I felt the thinks his Pendelbury was having a go at him as a person and not his football, it didnt sit well with me either.Are you referring to me? If so you may be confused… I was talking about being overly critical of a player whose played a handful of games… people saying “Fahey thinks he is Scott Pendulebury” is some of the biggest nonsense that’s been posted on here.
You make an interesting point.Yep understand those benefits, just think XO would offer more value overall.
Carlton have a much tougher midfield than Essendon, so another bullish mid who also goes forward and kicks goals would be valuable.