"Dangerous Tackles" is the term. "Rough Conduct"(there are some types who pay for such treatment) covers anything. Spear and sling tackles are both specifically mentioned in the Guidelines.
And we were already down a rotation with our sub activated. Cheers guys, thanks a lot.
I'm assuming it's dangerous tackles. But they're policing actions, not just whether the blokes head got near or hit the turf. There was also a Mihocek head to the turf in a tackle. But like with the Elliott one, it was the player with the ball's actions that mainly contributed to the head to the turf - their forward momentum not being slung to the turf by the tackler.
If you click on JDG's play (full screen) I think the impact is pretty similar so not sure why his is low and the other medium/high. (Not that upset he wasn't given a heavier penalty). It is all very subjective I think.
I agree. You can predict the rest of the finding, but the impact part is a crap shoot. By my reading of the rule which is supposed to include potential impact, they all should be high impact and 2 weeks really, but there'd be fury if they did that.
The solo man! Ha ha ha!
