Sheffield Shield Round 7: SA v Vic @ Adelaide Oval

[Drugs Are Bad Mackay?]

Because you can send someone out with a damaged muscle to bat if absolutely needed, you can also send out someone with a concussion but it carries inherent risk...the concussion sub rules are to stop teams from flirting with that line of players that "pass the test" but really aren't fine

Plenty of players have been unable to bat due to injury before, for injuries other than concussion

 

[Cleavy]

Nothing to suggest it would have been Quiney as he may have been sent back to play today as Gotch has been called up as the substitute fielder. Wonder if they will let him keep?

pretty certain sub fielders can't keep.

 

[Carlos Danger]

Because you can send someone out with a damaged muscle to bat if absolutely needed, you can also send out someone with a concussion but it carries inherent risk...the concussion sub rules are to stop teams from flirting with that line of players that "pass the test" but really aren't fine

They have protocols in place & doctors at every game, it's different than it used to be. If a player gets diagnosed with concussion or they think a player has it he won get sent back out.

One of the reasons I don't like the replacement rule is I think it's more likely to get exploited the other way, teams rule out a player to get a fresh one or a strategic advantage by swapping.

 

[eth-dog]

pretty certain sub fielders can't keep.

Think they can in games where the umpire and opposition captain let them.

 

[Bradesmaen]

Because you can send someone out with a damaged muscle to bat if absolutely needed, you can also send out someone with a concussion but it carries inherent risk...the concussion sub rules are to stop teams from flirting with that line of players that "pass the test" but really aren't fine

And sending someone out with a damaged muscle doesn't bring inherent risk? Especially if they can barely move?

 

[roscreasl98]

In context of the player is incapacitated and unable to play the game you philistine.

Thanks Doctor Knowall. Anyway, just about every team sport in the world allows for an immediate replacement/interchange of an injured player, except cricket of course.

 

[Bradesmaen]

Thanks Doctor Knowall. Anyway, just about every team sport in the world allows for an immediate replacement/interchange of an injured player, except cricket of course.

But they have interchanges available to use for other reasons other than injury. Cricket does not. Logic, use it.

 

[G Mus]

And sending someone out with a damaged muscle doesn't bring inherent risk? Especially if they can barely move?

A busted hammy is hardly going to kill you, concurrent concussions might

They have protocols in place & doctors at every game, it's different than it used to be. If a player gets diagnosed with concussion or they think a player has it he won get sent back out.

One of the reasons I don't like the replacement rule is I think it's more likely to get exploited the other way, teams rule out a player to get a fresh one or a strategic advantage by swapping.

It's to remove the temptation, fines happen across all codes because players get sent out with improper concussion protocol

If they can have a concussion sub it changes this way of thinking completely and teams won't take the risk


Why do you think it was instilled in the matador cup?

 

[Carlos Danger]

I

A busted hammy is hardly going to kill you, concurrent concussions might


It's to remove the temptation, fines happen across all codes because players get sent out with improper concussion protocol

If they can have a concussion sub it changes this way of thinking completely and teams won't take the risk


Why do you think it was instilled in the matador cup?

Its not up to the teams. It's up to the doctors.

A doctor is not going to risk his lucrative salary to win a cricket match.

Concussed players will not get sent out to bat anymore. There is no need to have a rule for it. Especially a rule that can be easily taken advantage of

 

[bird_man]

Massive turn around for the Vics here after being bowled out for 180. They would be aiming for at least 350 here.

 

[Bradesmaen]

A busted hammy is hardly going to kill you, concurrent concussions might

No, but internal bleeding from getting a ball to the gut might, but you aren't allowed to make a sub for that.

 

[Bradesmaen]

Massive turn around for the Vics here after being bowled out for 180. They would be aiming for at least 350 here.

If Aaron Finch is scoring runs, you know the pitch has flattened out.

 

[bird_man]

If Aaron Finch is scoring runs, you know the pitch has flattened out.

You blokes shouldn't have any trouble chasing the runs down then.

 

[Bradesmaen]

You blokes shouldn't have any trouble chasing the runs down then.

It is the Redbacks though. Mentally they aren't the greatest in the chase even on a flatter wicket.

 

[Bradesmaen]

Wow what a way to start. I turn on the stream and Fatman is gone because he's too fat to sweep around his front pad.

 

[Bumpswithagrin]

This commentary is good except for the dead silence at the end of the overs

Bugger! Finchy out LBW to Zampa

 

[Bradesmaen]

This commentary is good except for the dead silence at the end of the overs

Bugger! Finchy out LBW to Zampa

They haven't got David Warners 100 in a session merchandise to plug.

 

[Drugs Are Bad Mackay?]

Thanks Doctor Knowall. Anyway, just about every team sport in the world allows for an immediate replacement/interchange of an injured player, except cricket of course.

Cricket never has historically.

Interchange bench for cricket is an interesting one. They had the Super Sub for the domestic one dayers a while ago but it disappeared.

 

[ROOTA#6]

Wow what a way to start. I turn on the stream and Fatman is gone because he's too fat to sweep around his front pad.

You really are a high quality human being aren't u

 

[Moonwatcher]

Slimmest of chances for keeping it to 300.

 

[bird_man]

It is the Redbacks though. Mentally they aren't the greatest in the chase even on a flatter wicket.

They do seem to have a mentally weak batting line up.

 

[Bradesmaen]

Cricket never has historically.

Interchange bench for cricket is an interesting one. They had the Super Sub for the domestic one dayers a while ago but it disappeared.

Oh god that was the worst ever rule in cricket. I remember the ING Cup final at AO between SA and NSW when we were struggling, they subbed out a bowler for Ken Skewes who made 6 off of 28.

 

[bird_man]

That wicket hurts. Patto needs to make a 20 or 30 here to make sure we get to a good total.

He's been in cracking form with the bat in Premier Cricket.

 

[roscreasl98]

But they have interchanges available to use for other reasons other than injury. Cricket does not. Logic, use it.

But they are there for injury too. Never been to or watched a game of footy, rugby, soccer, basketball, netball, hockey, ice hockey, gridiron, volleyball, sepak takraw, hurling or kabaddi in your life? They all have injury interchange. You obviously weren't in the school debating team, because ur not very good at it.

 

[Bumpswithagrin]

Oh no, not a batting collapse please Vics. Need at least another 50 to 100 runs.