- Apr 2, 2000
- 74,878
- 25,059
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Chicago Bulls.
Is that the beginning of the game though, dont crowds often filter in as the game gets going?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's as good as it gets!!!!!Break out the fairy bread and hundreds and thousands, it's party time!
But they dont treat Dirk like the franchise guy. He barely takes shots. They dont run everything through him.
I dont quite know why he went on one more year. The Maverick were always gonna suck and were absolutely nowhere near a championship. I'd understand him going on one more year and joining a contender but why go one more year and suck all season.
I guess love of the game. But he's probably not helping the franchise. It's time for Dallas to move on from the great Dirk Nowitzki.
For a team with a 10-3 record, and a brand new arena, that is a horrific crowd.
The guy who wins will probably be the one with the most triple doubles, a la last year, not necessarily the best player.
A lot of voters still refuse to look at PER and +/-
East not looking that s**t anymore
Curry is not really having MVP type numbers. If anyone from GSW makes an MVP run it will be Durant.
Harden I think will get it though, momentum from last seasons close call. PG13 and Melo have impacted Westbrook too much for him to have an impact.
Not sure the Pels or Bucks will win enough games for Giannis, Cousins or AD to get it.
Huh?I think people are finally realizing that Curry is more important, and hence more valuable, than Durant in the Warriors success.
btw, this was always the case. I preached about Curry > Durant for importance (even if Durant is the better player) as soon as it became evident (pretty early last season).
Durant was Finals MVP and the difference in last seasons NBA Finals.Curry is their most important player imo. I would feel more comfortable in a series vs them if they had Durant over curry in the scenario where they can only have one
He was the icing to a curry flavoured cake, they were almost unbeatable without him.. would they be without Curry? I don’t think they would tbh.Durant was Finals MVP and the difference in last seasons NBA Finals.
Even LeBron said it. Durant makes them almost unbeatable. He's a different beast to Curry.
Well they got beat the previous season then Durant joins and they run the table. Curry is great but the Warriors best player is Durant.He was the icing to a curry flavoured cake, they were almost unbeatable without him.. would they be without Curry? I don’t think they would tbh.
Kyrie missed 1 game. Houston gutted their roster in depth to get Paul who has played 3 gamesConsidering they have their two best players out I'd say they're playing well above expectations.
Wait. Didn't they win a title before Durant?Huh?
Durant turns them into champions.
He's there best and most important player.
Call me a skeptic but I still think narrative plays a huge part.+/- is not all that useful and Westbrook had an amazing PER.... Self-defeating argument.
Huh?
Durant turns them into champions.
He's there best and most important player.
CurryDurant was Finals MVP and the difference in last seasons NBA Finals.
Even LeBron said it. Durant makes them almost unbeatable. He's a different beast to Curry.
Only idiots even thought this in the first place.I think people are finally realizing that Curry is more important, and hence more valuable, than Durant in the Warriors success.
btw, this was always the case. I preached about Curry > Durant for importance (even if Durant is the better player) as soon as it became evident (pretty early last season).
Huh?
Durant turns them into champions.
He's there best and most important player.