Melbourne Giant
Team Captain
- Aug 6, 2016
- 394
- 333
- AFL Club
- GWS
- Banned
- #176
That makes sense.My post was referring to the Hampson comment
I thought Vickery jagged some kind of Victoria's Secret model I wasn't aware of!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That makes sense.My post was referring to the Hampson comment
Bringing them in, I thought you were the experts at producing them, the thing is Vickery will not only lower the average age at Carlton he will also improve your team.Yeah recruiting Vickery does seem like a bit of a Richmond move. Hope Carlton doesn't start bringing in spuds too
That kind of recruiting is fine if you're just aiming for elimination finals embarrassmentBringing them in, I thought you were the experts at producing them, the thing is Vickery will not only lower the average age at Carlton he will also improve your team.
Id rather Vickery than Cloke, Cloke demoralises the whole team with his kicking and can only mark a ball if he has superglue on his gloves, Vickery is bad but not that bad.Any club that recruits Vickery is going backwards.
It's not his fault he gets selected each week but he is a battler at best, nothing personal, he battles hard for his lack of ability & amplifies Richmonds troubles when Vickery is a main forward.
He would not get a game for any other side in the 8 hence which Richmond ain't in the 8.
Carlton will go after Cloke b4 Vickery.
Anyone defending Vickery's ability clearly has no idea about football & what it takes to develop a successful club.
And studying Law does not classify someone as being intelligent cos I know plent of dumb Lawyers n Solicitors, plenty.
Any dumbass can study anything
I see your point that is a bridge too far for CarltonThat kind of recruiting is fine if you're just aiming for elimination finals embarrassment
Comparing Vickery to Clokes year is like comparing a pile of crap to another pile of crap.Id rather Vickery than Cloke, Cloke demoralises the whole team with his kicking and can only mark a ball if he has superglue on his gloves, Vickery is bad but not that bad.
2015
Cloke 17 games 34 - 23 ave 2.0-1.4
Vickery 15 games 31 - 9 ave 2.1-0.6
2016
Cloke 12games 15 - 14 ave 1.2-1.2
Vickery 16 games 24 - 15 ave 1.5-0.9
Todays HUN said he's been linked to the Hawks
Vickery can play, he's just lazy. Hawks are the one club who could turn him around.Please no.
Vickery can play, he's just lazy. Hawks are the one club who could turn him around.
The problem with Vickery is he does a couple of nice things a game gets his two goals and does SFA for the rest of the time, watch him v the Cats last week if he can't easily get to the ball he makes no attempt to crash the pack and bring the ball to ground, he is very conservative with his actions, but he can kick goals, maybe the Hawks could make something of him but I fear he will be at Richmond again next year.Hawthorn would be a great move for Vickery. With their ball movement he'd instantly be a better player.
I dunno. Imagine how many cherry pick goals he'd kick there.I so want Vickery to join the Hawks. With his ability he'll drag the whole team down along with him and we'll see new teams in the finals series as a result.
Don't get too cocky junky supporter; you've seen how all your player perform when off 'the gear' and it ain't pretty at all...I so want Vickery to join the Hawks. With his ability he'll drag the whole team down along with him and we'll see new teams in the finals series as a result.
The quicker the ball movement the least amount of time he has to think, that's when he's at his best.Hawthorn would be a great move for Vickery. With their ball movement he'd instantly be a better player.
Don't get too cocky junky supporter; you've seen how all your player perform when off 'the gear' and it ain't pretty at all...
Given his knack of attracting frees because he keeps falling over he would fit in perfectly with freekickhawthorn.Todays HUN said he's been linked to the Hawks
Given his knack of attracting frees because he keeps falling over he would fit in perfectly with freekickhawthorn.
One falls over with the ball not in sight from a feather touch bump. The other gets tackled around the neck when bending over to pick up the ball in a pack. Completely comparable.Apparently he studies Joel Selwood videos.
If we get vickery im moving to siberia!