List Mgmt. Welcome to Geelong, Mitch Hardie

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Yes, but not quite to the same degree as the other two. Though I would suggest that Knevitt has a higher ceiling than either.

Maybe. Of the three Knevitt is the one who's shown most at AFL level this year though, and is also the nearest thing we have to a Blicavs replacement (though he's probably more of a Joel Corey or David Mundy type TBH). I'd have him in the team ahead of Dempsey or Parfitt.
 
I can understand wanting to keep Hardie for a pre season to see if he can improve. But as a mature age player coming from the sanfl he’s very disappointing he wasn’t really close to playing a game. We’ve been lacking in the midfield most of the season so the fact he couldn’t/wasn’t given a game doesn’t reflect well on where the club sees him.
To me the mid season draft is there and should be there to help fill a role for the rest of the season. We picked someone in a position we needed them never played him. Seems a pretty strange choice as it was last year.
What were the better options available? It’s a thin pool of talent.
 
If I were in charge of running the mid-season draft I'd be thinking along these lines:

1) Is there something we're missing right now? Maybe injuries have decimated our ruck department, in which case I'd be looking at someone like Naismith who can come in and fill a role for six months.

2) If we're all good on the availability front, the sort of young player we might want to draft anyway and give him half a season's head start.

3) If the youth talent pool is thin but we're challenging for finals, perhaps there's a recent retiree that would be worth looking at. Perhaps someone who feels they were squeezed out of their team a year early, has had six months' rest, the body's feeling better and he thinks he's still got something to offer. A player like that could make the ideal tacsub specialist.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top