No name on his locker means he has a number that no player has played 100 games in right? He's gotta be 40 then (or 45+)
He's worn 26 for Western Jets and 71 for Footscray so far.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No name on his locker means he has a number that no player has played 100 games in right? He's gotta be 40 then (or 45+)
No name on his locker means he has a number that no player has played 100 games in right? He's gotta be 40 then (or 45+)
40, 45, 46, 47, 48, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 are the free numbers that haven't had players get to 100
No one has played 100 games in 26 which Raak wore at the Western Jets so my bet is on 26.
I left 26 off the list as Dom Bedendo has that number. Other non 100 game numbers currently being worn are: 37 (R Smith), 41 (Sweet), 43 (Gardner), 44 (English).
Well perhaps Bedendo is moving up and if not I'll go back to my original guess of 71 which he's worn at Footscray.
It will probably be the first 71 to be worn in senior football but I don't think the AFL will allow it, no sense of humor, maybe 60 which was Libba seniors old number
I would've lost money that Michael Ford never played 100 games for us in No.45. Seemed to be a constant for years. What a whole hearted, though limited, competitor he was. Classic Footscray defender.40, 45, 46, 47, 48, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 are the free numbers that haven't had players get to 100
I would've lost money that Michael Ford never played 100 games for us in No.45. Seemed to be a constant for years. What a whole hearted, though limited, competitor he was. Classic Footscray defender.