I've posted on this before to say that I think it would've been one of the club's most difficult decisions and had any one of his contract/injury status or age been different we may have seen another outcome.
At the minute Connor has taken Micky's old spot and is about 21 so the long term upside is far greater.
Mick has moved on and our supporters should do themselves the club and Mick the favour of following suit.
He's in a much better position in terms of where he sits on the list he's on.
At the minute Connor has taken Micky's old spot and is about 21 so the long term upside is far greater.
Mick has moved on and our supporters should do themselves the club and Mick the favour of following suit.
He's in a much better position in terms of where he sits on the list he's on.
Last edited: