Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2020 Draft and Trade Hypotheticals - Part 2 (The 2020 Draft)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Didn't Melbourne make the grand final that year?
Yes, they did.

You also only have to go back to last year with Fyfe winning a Brownlow while Fremantle finished 13th to find a Brownlow medalist from a rubbish team, let alone going back 20 years.
 
Seems strange that the only people who seem to be saying we should have taken DGB over McDonald are those on Big Footy. Every media EXPERT (who should know a lot more than we do) have stated that "we got a steal in McDonald. Don't know how he fell through to 4."
For all those who are hanging their opinion on the one game they played against each other this year where DBG had the better of him - just think of this:
For those who remember the game in the 90s there was a great defender in Glenn Jackovich. At the same time there was a great CHF in Wayne Carey. Back in these days they played one on one - no rubbish team defence we have to put up with today.
Quite regularly, Jackovich had the better of Carey yet if you were a recruiter and had the choice of the two, who would you take?
Taking McDonald instead of DGB was a no brainer. Key forwards are the most difficult of all players to find.
Granted, he will take a few years before we see the best of him as he needs to gain body strength, but so be it.

Not true. Twomey asked 12 AFL recruiters who they would have taken at pick one (anonymously of course) and the answers were

DGB - 4.5
McDonald - 4
Tilthorpe - 3
Hollands - 0.5
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Yep I am very happy. Obviously I saw our midfield as our biggest priority and saw Phillips as the best prospect in the pool, so that would've been the dream overlap. However we could never lose if we improved our forward stocks either. Even Thilthorpe who I was a fan of, I wouldn't have been convinced that he would help our scoring issues given he is more of a CHF. So I'm stoked we have McDonald, and I think you're right that we should try and lock him down long-term, as key forwards tend to go walkabouts!
When you look at this drat, there were 7 very capable midfielders taken in the first 13 selections. Fair to say, we will pick up a very handy mid next year. We may even use our number 1 pick to trade for one. Getting McDonald now was a godsend.
 
I'd like to thank North's new boss who told them to stock up on mids. And I'd like to thank Will Philips for being good enough. I'd also like to thank the trades for pick 2 not being up to scratch and North being gun shy and not pulling the trigger.

It worked out well

A couple articles linked us to Philips right after North said pick 2 was on the table. Hard to think it was a coincidence
I'm sure they perused our draft thread and got a little gun shy. Who knows it may have even persuaded them to draft Philips although I'm fairly sure North's recruiting team are more professional than to take their cues from the Swans bigfooty forum. Only fairly certain.
 
I can easily believe that. Parker is a very strong mark for his size and a reliable kick at goal too. He would be a tough opponent for any defender or unfortunate midfielder that is stuck on him in the forward line.
When the time comes, I think Parker could definitely play out his career up forward. He is very dangerous up there. That ability will prolong his career. For the time being though I think we need him more in the middle.
 
Parker, not reliable. Hewett, played as a tagger, Rowbottom, only young promising inside mid we have.
How on earth can you possibly say that Parker is not reliable. That is just ridiculous and one of the worst comments you have made here imo. I mean he did finish in the top 5 in this year's brownlow.
 
When you look at this drat, there were 7 very capable midfielders taken in the first 13 selections. Fair to say, we will pick up a very handy mid next year. We may even use our number 1 pick to trade for one. Getting McDonald now was a godsend.

Who knows, next year's draft is always the better one. Phillips for me was a clear number 1 and North did an outstanding job to get him. I'm really not sure why it was so surprising that the best midfielder in a draft was taken with a pick 3. It's even less surprising when you consider North already have their gun key forward for the future lined up in Larkey, so the midfield was definitely a more pressing need for them. Good recruiting by them, and it made our decision easier by leaving the most obvious player for one of our most obvious needs right in our lap.

The only loser here was Phillips.
 
Parker stats

League averages clearances ranking

2016 - 12th
2017 - 11th
2018 - 18th
2019 - 24th
2020 - 18th

League averages for centre clearances rankings

2016 - 15th
2017 - 16th
2018 - 37th
2019 - 19th
2020 - 5th

Inside 50's

2016 - 74th
2017 - 56th
2018 - 75th
2019 - 94th
2020 - 56th

So he gets okay clearance numbers, but those numbers don't translate into inside 50's. Most the top inside midfielders also rank very highly on inside 50 numbers as well. Parker doesn't, meaning even when he gets a clearance it isn't particularly damaging.
And most of these years without a ruck.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Who knows, next year's draft is always the better one. Phillips for me was a clear number 1 and North did an outstanding job to get him. I'm really not sure why it was so surprising that the best midfielder in a draft was taken with a pick 3. It's even less surprising when you consider North already have their gun key forward for the future lined up in Larkey, so the midfield was definitely a more pressing need for them. Good recruiting by them, and it made our decision easier by leaving the most obvious player for one of our most obvious needs right in our lap.

The only loser here was Phillips.
I'm not at all surprised that North took a mid at 3. I did think though that it would be Hollands.
 
I'm not at all surprised that North took a mid at 3. I did think though that it would be Hollands.

Yeah me too. It's quite funny that for all the talk of a COVID-impacted year, the first half a dozen picks panned out pretty much how I reckon it'd go in a normal year. Two of the three kids regarded as the top 3 at the start of the year (Ugle-Hagan and Phillips) went top 3 despite no footy; a kid with an ACL (Hollands) ended up sliding; Thilthorpe, who was higher regarded than the two WAFL boys at the start of this year, was picked before them; and a Northern Academy lad (Campbell) was bid on early in the draft. It's like the season being totally compromised ended up having very little impact on how the clubs used their high picks.
 
Yeah me too. It's quite funny that for all the talk of a COVID-impacted year, the first half a dozen picks panned out pretty much how I reckon it'd go in a normal year. Two of the three kids regarded as the top 3 at the start of the year (Ugle-Hagan and Phillips) went top 3 despite no footy; a kid with an ACL (Hollands) ended up sliding; Thilthorpe, who was higher regarded than the two WAFL boys at the start of this year, was picked before them; and a Northern Academy lad (Campbell) was bid on early in the draft. It's like the season being totally compromised ended up having very little impact on how the clubs used their high picks.
It isn't all that surprising. Changes in the anticipated draft order from the previous year to the year of the draft happen because of new information that comes to light in the draft year. When next to no football is played in the draft year that means there is little new information, so the earlier consensus does not get changed much.
 
It isn't all that surprising. Changes in the anticipated draft order from the previous year to the year of the draft happen because of new information that comes to light in the draft year. When next to no football is played in the draft year that means there is little new information, so the earlier consensus does not get changed much.

Correct, I wasn't surprised, especially considering I rated Phillips and Thilthorpe above McDonald & DGB, despite having less exposed form. I just found it interesting that that exposed form didn't do much to change the expected order.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Not entirely. Look at the top 10 inside 50's players in 2020

1. Martin
2. Dangerfield
3. Merrett
4. Cousins
5. Bontempelli
6. S.Bolton
7. Neale
8. Viney
9. Florent
10. Macrae

So while not every player on that list is an inside midfielder, a lot of them are, and many of them the best inside mids in the competition.
For the record, Parker is a champion... very, very consistent player imo...

Are you telling me that FLORENT is listed in the top 10 inside 50's players for 2020??? Bloody hell!!! I couldn't figure out why this board had a hate on him, but this makes sense now... Where did this list come from? And what is it's value? Are these effective inside 50's or do they include anything that crosses the line?
 
For the record, Parker is a champion... very, very consistent player imo...

Are you telling me that FLORENT is listed in the top 10 inside 50's players for 2020??? Bloody hell!!! I couldn't figure out why this board had a hate on him, but this makes sense now... Where did this list come from? And what is it's value? Are these effective inside 50's or do they include anything that crosses the line?
Without Parker as a dominant midfielder (and player) many other players would not even perform as well. He sets the tone. Without him is like taking Rampe out of the backline or Buddy out of the forwards.
 
For the record, Parker is a champion... very, very consistent player imo...

Are you telling me that FLORENT is listed in the top 10 inside 50's players for 2020??? Bloody hell!!! I couldn't figure out why this board had a hate on him, but this makes sense now... Where did this list come from? And what is it's value? Are these effective inside 50's or do they include anything that crosses the line?
Whoever has Florent as a top inside mid was intoxicated at the time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top