Remove this Banner Ad

Preview Changes VS Collingwood - Rnd 23

  • Thread starter Thread starter Seppo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Out: Injured players
In: whoever is left

Schammer to get a game surely now...

Until today I would say never ... I think it would be the right thing to do for somebody who has kept trying without complaining (i assume). If he is going to be axed next season it would at least be an honourable thing to do
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Hinkley out. Schammer in. Injured players out (Pav, Silver, Fyfe, Balla, Mayne, Mundy, Sandi) anyone fit in, if we are short of 22 then we play with 18 or 21 or whatever...
 
I feel for Schammer. Whilst he is not in our best 22, he has deserved an opportunity ahead of peripheral players at times this year. I don't care if he won't be here next year, the fact is that he would have contributed more than the likes of Pitt, who clearly isn't ready.

There's a rebellious trait of mine that hopes that if he is named, Schammer says 'up yours'...
 
Mick Malthouse and Paul Roos may be available and you want Eade? Are you some kind of f***ing nimrod?

Paul Roos has already said he does not want to uproot his family from Sydney. He is not going anywhere. I very much doubt Malthouse will be anywhere but Collingwood, plus even if he is available I think he will choose to stay in Melb rather than come to us.
 
He'll be suspended I think.

I'll be so annoyed if after a good game, he ends up getting suspended. The hit was pretty clumsy, but he did try to pull up late and lately it seems the only thing that matters is if the player goes off injured. And Mullett did take his kick. So he should get off.

Changes wont be easy this week, especially with players being held back from WAFL duties. No point bringing guys like Duffield or Pearce back after not actually playing any WAFL.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

hinks may go for a week suspended, but there should be no way he gets dropped, was fanatstic yesterday and one of the few who showed some heart
 
Out: Pav (inj), Clinkers ( sus), McPhee, Ballas ( inj )

In: Faulks, Bucovaz, Schammer, Pearce

McPhee just doent do it for me, Is slow and well past best. Give Buco his spot for the last couple of games. Schammer deserves a shot given his form in the WAFL. Like to see Faulks get a couple of games in down back.

IMO play Johnno at CHF and Clarke/Sandilands at FF. Give our midfeild some targets to kick to.
 
Until today I would say never ... I think it would be the right thing to do for somebody who has kept trying without complaining (i assume). If he is going to be axed next season it would at least be an honourable thing to do

Coming in for a flogging against Collingwood is supposed to be some sort of reward? He'd be in his rights to say "Sorry, I'm not available."
 
I've long had this theory that if promoted, Sibosado would come good. He's always struck me as one of those players who will be better at AFL level than WAFL. It wont happen, and really it shouldn't happen. But if were to replace Pavlich with a forward....

I wonder if we could even see Bollenhagen this week too. Another who shouldn't really be in the frame, but he could really use a run to show why he should be kept around. Not like we have many other options to replace Ballantyne.

In: Faulks, Bucovaz, Bollenhagen
Out: Pavlich, Ballantyne, McPhee
 
Pav & balla injured assuming hinckley gets a reprimand i'd leave in. SNOS by be out due to a pouple of wacks to head.


I agree with johno at CHF and rotating sandi and zac at FF, BUT we needs crumbers at their feet!!

FB: Brought Elvis, Faulks
HB: Suban Grover, Broughton
CL: Fyfe Mundy Duffield
HF: Tendai, Johnno, Mayne
FF: Hill SNOS, Zac

Ruck: Sandi, Crowley(tagger), Barlow

Int: Lower, Palmer, Pitt, Nanny Mcphee

need for crumbers up forward hence tendai and hill

if we get within 4 goals we have played well.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

hahah hinkley out surely you jest.

Was in the top 3-5 best to half time then as Chris said was played out of position. Ridiculous call if serious.

Hinkley wasn't even close to being best 5 for us at any point during the game. he wasn't our worst, but he was nowhere near our best.

That said, I've listed him as an out because of the likely suspension, not for form reasons. If he isn't suspended then he stays in the team for the rest of the season, simply so he can show what he has got to offer in different roles...

He'll be suspended I think.

I think so too, that is why I listed him as an out. The MRP is hard to follow though, will be interesting to see what the difference is in the treatment of Hinkley and Waters, given the nature of both hits. Hinks might get away with a reprimand as he doesn't have any carry over points or prior record.
 
Our season is officially over now that Sydney have won, so I really think we should shut up shop for the season.

Out; Pavlich, Sandilands, Fyfe, Silvagni, Hill, Mundy, Hinkley (Susp)

In: Griffen, Kepler, Faulks, Bollenhagen, Lower, Duffield, Pearce
 
Our season is officially over now that ****


Out; Pavlich, Sandilands, Fyfe, Silvagni, Hill, Mundy, Hinkley (Susp)

In: Griffen, Kepler, Faulks, Bollenhagen, Lower, Duffield, Pearce

Y'all might want to put a spoiler alert in that post Lester, not everyone on will have had the chance to watch the game yet and they wouldn't be expecting to see the result listed in this thread...
 
Hinkley wasn't even close to being best 5 for us at any point during the game. he wasn't our worst, but he was nowhere near our best.

That said, I've listed him as an out because of the likely suspension, not for form reasons. If he isn't suspended then he stays in the team for the rest of the season, simply so he can show what he has got to offer in different roles...



I think so too, that is why I listed him as an out. The MRP is hard to follow though, will be interesting to see what the difference is in the treatment of Hinkley and Waters, given the nature of both hits. Hinks might get away with a reprimand as he doesn't have any carry over points or prior record.

hinkley by half time was best on ground for us along with clarke and mundy... anyone who says otherwise is letting the hate come out. he had 13 touches at 93% along with 3 scoring involvements. not to mention his tackling. if he hadnt of been moved deep forward in the second half he would have been top 2 on ground for us. as it is, even with a quieter second half he was still easily in our best 5
 
hinkley by half time was best on ground for us along with clarke and mundy... anyone who says otherwise is letting the hate come out. he had 13 touches at 93% along with 3 scoring involvements

I am a massive Hinkley hater, I really don't think he would ever feature in a Fremantle team of importance...... but he was much better yesterday, I have to concede that.

Although, he did completely pull out of two contests and continues to position himself in incredibly stupid positions, much better last night, but an absolute crab of a footballer.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom