Prediction Changes vs West Coast Eagles

[El_Scorcho]

Forwards don't mark the ball. There's a player in front of them one over the back and one waiting for the tap down to run out of defense. We might get 8 goals from talls marking and West Coast would get 16 from our forwards not marking.

Talls have to be very good or they are a waste of time.

Forwards mark the ball all the time, bit even if they don't, if we pick competent talls who will compete in the air then the likes of Gray and Wingard can stay down for the spill. At the moment they have to play a lead up role and fly for marks.

 

[Boxx]

Surely Pittard doesn't make the trip over to Perth!

 

[Gray Day]

Inb4 70-40 inside 50s in our favour again and we still lose

 

[Contested Marx]

Playing 21 is a bold strategy, Cotton, but surely the results couldn't be worse.

Got excited with the X's

 

[El Zorro]

The gigantic Subiaco is going to look like the Sahara to Sam Gray and his puny kick.

liked for puny

 

[finbarr]

liked for puny

Mad Max 2 is a pretty shit film but when Lord Humungous says into the mic "What a puny plan", I always laugh out loud.

 

[Port01]

Hombsch for Hartlett if injured it is then.
Big calls!

 

[Arsene Wenger]

hutchings will go to wingard in the middle. Move hom fwd and Give him the 50 to work his magic

 

[spookism]

Hmmm....I see.

 

[El_Scorcho]

#sackhinkley obviously.

 

[rumoursofwinter]

I don't understand this board.

Last week no melts.

Hombsch late out for Neade.

This week it's likely that Homsch comes back in for Pittard and Atley for Neade.

So effectively from last weeks named side Atley for Pittard.

Atley was named best for the Magpies. (only other best players were Hewett and Lienart)

Everyone wants Atley named. Don't understand. I get that people want another marking forward but ours aren't much chop at the moment.

No melts. Atley for Pittard. (likely) Melts.

 

[PatientMental]

View attachment 389464

This

I got you bro.

 

[finbarr]

I just realised Jake Neade is still in. That's a sackable offence in itself.

 

[El_Scorcho]

I don't understand this board.

Last week no melts.

Hombsch late out for Neade.

This week it's likely that Homsch comes back in for Pittard and Atley for Neade.

So effectively from last weeks named side Atley for Pittard.

Atley was named best for the Magpies. (only other best players were Hewett and Lienart)

Everyone wants Atley named. Don't understand. I get that people want another marking forward but ours aren't much chop at the moment.

No melts. Atley for Pittard. (likely) Melts.

The forwardline issue can't continue to be ignored. More I50s than points scored against Richmond and Eddy and Howard are in form.

We're sick of waiting. There's no good reason for this farce to continue.

 

[Chewy316]

People have been calling for Atley to get a shot for weeks. He's most likely getting a chance now and people are still melting.

I have no doubt we could have a team that's as successful as the 07 Cats and a select few on this forum would still manage to melt.

 

[edgie]

Yous guys have no idea about football. The most important things are:

Repeat entries
Rebound 50s
Lower than average opposition scores
Numbers at the contest

I feel we can really nail it with this selection. Yes the other team may have a higher score at the end than us, but we need to look at the big picture here: Playing Port Adelaide footy

Sent from mTalk

 

[Schulzenfest]

I get that people want another marking forward but ours aren't much chop at the moment.

How far clear on top of the Ken Farmer medal does Eddy have to be before he reaches the status of 'much chop'?

 

[edgie]

How far clear on top of the Ken Farmer medal does Eddy have to be before he reaches the status of 'much chop'?

Negative seven positions.

Sent from mTalk

 

[Doctor Feel]

Atley, excellent.

No extra tall and the potential of yet another defender?

 

[PatientMental]

Lecras to finally break his duck!

 

[Contested Marx]

I got you bro.

View attachment 389486

Yep but wouldn't bother with Eddy if Doooogz in

 

[tribey]

I don't understand this board.

Last week no melts.

Hombsch late out for Neade.

This week it's likely that Homsch comes back in for Pittard and Atley for Neade.

So effectively from last weeks named side Atley for Pittard.

Atley was named best for the Magpies. (only other best players were Hewett and Lienart)

Everyone wants Atley named. Don't understand. I get that people want another marking forward but ours aren't much chop at the moment.

No melts. Atley for Pittard. (likely) Melts.

Neade was an out this time last week.

The news of his late inclusion at the game resulted in many an exchanged look of concern.

 

[Contested Marx]

Negative seven positions.

Sent from mTalk

But where is he on the Forward Fifty Pressure Acts ladder?

 

[PAFC66]

Inb4 70-40 inside 50s in our favour again and we still lose

Nah

We'll barely sniff it all day.

 

[PAFC66]

People have been calling for Atley to get a shot for weeks. He's most likely getting a chance now and people are still melting.

I have no doubt we could have a team that's as successful as the 07 Cats and a select few on this forum would still manage to melt.

Because this week isn't the game we bring him in. We have enough inside on ballers.. we need more outside run and a tall up forward. Otherwise look forward to the Eagles defence just zoning off and having a field day up our end as usual when we relentlessly bang in on-top of short people all day.

We have no where near a side as successful as Geelong 07. We are mentally weak, very little big bodies in the middle , bottom 4 footskills and a cluster **** of a forward line. If you recall Geelong beat good sides in 2007. We haven't beaten a top 8 side for over 18 months.

Im on my last legs with Ken, we are still in the 8 so calls to sack him now is rediculous but I can gaurentee we'll be 12th or more in a fortnight