Wow has Lyons dropped that much. Had a really good year last year and most seem to not have him in the 22. Im a huge fan and i wish we still had him
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Wow has Lyons dropped that much. Had a really good year last year and most seem to not have him in the 22. Im a huge fan and i wish we still had him
Couple of quick ones, trying to understand 22s better
If no Zorko or Berry, is Lyons any chance or do they need more injuries then that? Heard he was clear BOG in the 2nds on the weekend
Why is Answerth emg/on the outer? Thought he wouldve been ahead of guys like Willmot/Prior for wing. Has he just had an ordinary PS?
Usually 4 inside mids required per team.Lyons can't play anywere other than inside mid - if either Dunkley or Neale miss games, he's an easy inclusion. Berry/Zorko tend to be more outside options.
Answerth's come back from injury only recently, and in my opinion has some limitations compared to Wimot/Prior who are better users of the footy.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Usually 4 inside mids required per team.
From what i see would mean a Robertson playing off a wing or high half fwd instead
Couple of quick ones, trying to understand 22s better
If no Zorko or Berry, is Lyons any chance or do they need more injuries then that? Heard he was clear BOG in the 2nds on the weekend
Why is Answerth emg/on the outer? Thought he wouldve been ahead of guys like Willmot/Prior for wing. Has he just had an ordinary PS?
I have Lyons in my starting 22 round 1, but i am in the very small minority on the BF Lions boardWow has Lyons dropped that much. Had a really good year last year and most seem to not have him in the 22. Im a huge fan and i wish we still had him
Usually 4 inside mids required per team.
From what i see would mean a Robertson playing off a wing or high half fwd instead
Hes quite capable rotating at half forward and inside mid.Lyons can't play anywere other than inside mid - if either Dunkley or Neale miss games, he's an easy inclusion. Berry/Zorko tend to be more outside options.
Answerth's come back from injury only recently, and in my opinion has some limitations compared to Wimot/Prior who are better users of the footy.
Certainly Mcluggage and Ashcroft can play elsewhereNeale, Dunkley, McCluggage and Ashcroft
Certainly Mcluggage and Ashcroft can play elsewhere
No doubt the question at some point could be do we get more from Lyons onball, With Hugh half wing and half onball vs say an Answerth/Willmot/Prior on a wing and Hugh onball
Majority clearly again playing him here unless Dunks or Neale are out which is fair to. Just seeing if there is a world that he plays whilst there still in the side
If it was me coaching id have a good look at a 60% TOG role (Subbed earlier if no injuries), purely onball with the other 240% going to Neale 75, Dunks 70, Hugh 45, Ashcroft 50%
and the concern of Dunks, Lyons, Neale all at CBA (the most open play on field) is slow and that would be a part of the reasoning along with a few other factors but i feel as long as one of an Ashcroft, Hugh are atleast in their then it could possibly work
Yep, best user of the ball in the team, need the ball in his hands as much as possible.We want Clug getting as much of the footy as possible. That happens playing on ball as opposed to wing or half forward
Kiddy would give him a run for his money.... can not have too many good users of the footy.Yep, best user of the ball in the team, need the ball in his hands as much as possible.
Hes quite capable rotating at half forward and inside mid.
I think you are a great judge of football talent.Provided Froggy's fit, I'd have him in the team every day of the week over Joyce. I'm an unabashed Froggy fan tho
The last part is particularly important. And if i were Lyons i would want to come in totally fit and ready to stake my place. If he comes in injury free but without peak fitness he could have his papers stamped effectively. So get super fit and try to bang down the door. And at worst be the automatic inclusion if Neale or Dunkley are injured. He would probably be Ashcroft / Clugga's replacement too if back to his best.He's capable but there are far better options as half forwards who can rotate in. I'm a big fan of JL in terms of what he did for us, but his physical limitations were on show last year (and he was hampered by injury). He probably needs at least 4-6 games of VFL to make up for the pre-season he missed.
whether it was his groin last year, but too slow and could not or cannot kick a ball beyond 40 metersWow has Lyons dropped that much. Had a really good year last year and most seem to not have him in the 22. Im a huge fan and i wish we still had him
Usually I opt for the development approach when 50/50 decision, but I actually think I would have 150+ games Froggy ahead of 12+ games Joyce.I think you are a great judge of football talent.
Pure genius!Usually I opt for the development approach when 50/50 decision, but I actually think I would have 150+ games Froggy ahead of 12+ games Joyce.
But if he gets over his groin problems and returns to the form of the two previous years we have a midfield that rocksDid not have a really good year last year
Replaced with Dunkley
I used to umpire cricket matches and I always knew the season was well under way when a deep fielder had come off the boundary, gradually crept in against his captains instructions, and a catch dropped over his head.I think you are a great judge of football talent.