Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah Monty has guts to call out ken untrustworthy comment. People think 5 years of some times good all of a sudden is Hinkley changed no way. Hinkley needs to go before Schofield gets poached
Did you think the performance against the Bulldogs was good enough, did you? There were a lot of players like Lycett, Wines, Motlop and Ebert - senior players - who let us down with their games. If those three had the kind of intent for the ball that they displayed against Adelaide, we win against the Dogs.
Montgomery didn't call it out. He simply said that he hasn't been here long enough to know what has gone on before, and that the Bulldogs game really could have gone either way in horrible conditions. He wasn't here when we lost to Carlton and Brisbane in 2015, and Carlton in 2016. He wasn't here when we got smashed by Adelaide in 2017. He wasn't here when we fell from 11-4 to missing finals.
Ken's comment was one borne out of frustration with a team that he has coached for awhile still making the same mistakes, even though it's a different group of players.
"I just believe in the group. I know people won't like that… (but) this is a better group," Hinkey said.
"It's not the same group. I got asked that question in a press conference, (and said) we're inconsistent, unreliable, not trustworthy.
"This is a different group altogether. They're learning, they're going to be a better team at some point. (But) there will be frustrations."
And go....
Just a few ken lovers we have on ignore.Wow this thread is 2 pages long and the opposing point of view thread is over 300 pages long.
I’m guessing Port supporters aren’t all that enamoured with their senior coach
Wow this thread is 2 pages long and the opposing point of view thread is over 300 pages long.
I’m guessing Port supporters aren’t all that enamoured with their senior coach
He is certainly creative in his ideas. The Sutcliffe inclusion with the Dixon exclusion was very divergent thinking.Our coach is at the top of his game.
Wow this thread is 2 pages long and the opposing point of view thread is over 300 pages long.
I’m guessing Port supporters aren’t all that enamoured with their senior coach
He is certainly creative in his ideas. The Sutcliffe inclusion with the Dixon exclusion was very divergent thinking.
why does this thread exist