Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
agree lachie not up to it...delistThey have to delist Lachie Langford. Watched him a bit over the last 2 years and is clearly not up to it.
Replace him on the rookie list with Glass.
Id rather give Lowden a miss tbh. Would hate to pick someone for depth if we didn't think they had some development in then and could at the very least challenge for B22.
On Fitzpatrick, I might be in the minority here but I genuinely think there's a spot for him going forward.
Despite being out for a long time with his concussion I think he showed some fantastic qualities after Ceglar went down. Absolutely more moments that made me sit up and think he had a future than those poorer ones that he gets ragged on when he was at the Dees.
His follow up work after contest the ruck was excellent. Athletic and talented for mine.
I'd be very surprised if they kept him after coming 16th in the dev b & f, there's a lot of players ahead of him atm.Lachie is an interesting case, he has nice skills and moves ok just doesn't have the intensity, kinda the opposite of Will.
He was coming from a long way back physically, I'd be inclined to give him another year unless they absolutely need the spot or are 100% sure that he won't make it even to the decent depth player list ever
Agree with your assesment of Jack. What has me sold is his surprising turn of speed for a big guy.
Probably a bit too slow. Plus with Vickery wanting to play more ruck time that means Fitz would play more forward and I'd hate to have him more permanently forward tbhCould we play McEvoy in the ruck, Vickery at CHF and Jack at FF and let the latter two each have stints in the ruck, or does that make us too slow?
Good lord....Could we play McEvoy in the ruck, Vickery at CHF and Jack at FF and let the latter two each have stints in the ruck, or does that make us too slow?
Could we play McEvoy in the ruck, Vickery at CHF and Jack at FF and let the latter two each have stints in the ruck, or does that make us too slow?
Could we play McEvoy in the ruck, Vickery at CHF and Jack at FF and let the latter two each have stints in the ruck, or does that make us too slow?
He is quick for a ruckman. Slow for anyone else.It could work, Jack is said to be quite quick, and we were probably going to have vickery and BB anyway
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Also, why are we always the last club to announce delistings?
Also, why are we always the last club to announce delistings?
Also they get a better look at other clubs delistings to see if they want to grab anyDon't make a decision before you have to. There is a date (the 31st?) when all delistings must be announced. Waiting until then gives the player management team time to plan the draft one last time. Maybe the fitness staff time to do some testing, etc. and there's nothing that can happen with a delisted player until the delisted draft happens, anyway.
Would the club have told the players yet, though?Don't make a decision before you have to. There is a date (the 31st?) when all delistings must be announced. Waiting until then gives the player management team time to plan the draft one last time. Maybe the fitness staff time to do some testing, etc. and there's nothing that can happen with a delisted player until the delisted draft happens, anyway.
Would the club have told the players yet, though?
Could we play McEvoy in the ruck, Vickery at CHF and Jack at FF and let the latter two each have stints in the ruck, or does that make us too slow?
That would be risky wouldn't it?any chance might delist an redraft someone seeing as our picks are so late ?
So three below average ruck forwards in the same team? :/
I know it sounds ridiculous but I'd like a ruck/fwd who can win the ball from a tap and then kick a 60 metre goal to win a close one in his first game for Hawthorn. Am I asking too much?Agree with your assesment of Jack. What has me sold is his surprising turn of speed for a big guy.