MarblesFolly
Cancelled
- Sep 24, 2016
- 79
- 291
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
With the recent sacking of an AFL staffer for alleged sexual misconduct I wanted to open up the forum for discussion about what exactly an entity like the AFL should be doing to combat this type of assault and also other sexually related offences.
Recently the AFL have seemingly taken a very strong stance on sexual misconduct by players and staff , form the Nathan Broad "sexting" issue through to the standing down of Lethlean and another AFL employee for what seemingly was a consensual act between two adults but probably blurred the lines of decency based on a power dynamic with in their employment relationship, ignoring the moral aspects of the "affair" type situation that was also involved in these events.
I wish to ask where people see the line where the AFL ceases to become involved. Where is their moral shut off point to being an active defender of what is considered sexual misconduct.
For example if a convicted paedophile was regularly attending training of an AFL club whereby they would have access to children in the age group that the conviction stemmed from, would it be the AFL or club (as a representative of the AFL) responsibility to ban or "warn off" such a character from their establishment.
Does anyone else have any concepts on this or further discussions points for this.
Recently the AFL have seemingly taken a very strong stance on sexual misconduct by players and staff , form the Nathan Broad "sexting" issue through to the standing down of Lethlean and another AFL employee for what seemingly was a consensual act between two adults but probably blurred the lines of decency based on a power dynamic with in their employment relationship, ignoring the moral aspects of the "affair" type situation that was also involved in these events.
I wish to ask where people see the line where the AFL ceases to become involved. Where is their moral shut off point to being an active defender of what is considered sexual misconduct.
For example if a convicted paedophile was regularly attending training of an AFL club whereby they would have access to children in the age group that the conviction stemmed from, would it be the AFL or club (as a representative of the AFL) responsibility to ban or "warn off" such a character from their establishment.
Does anyone else have any concepts on this or further discussions points for this.