Why do you give Wallace the benefit of the doubt (justly) but not the players or board? March called the media attention a circus, not the club. There's no evidence of anyone going behind Wallace's back or leaking anything to the media. Why are you deciding to back Wallace but not the rest of the club? Isn't it a bit hypocritical to talk about a united front while slagging off the president, suggesting the board is conspiring against the coach and the players are leaking information to the media?