Opinion VICBias - Genuine Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

You don't think it is odd? I mean GWS is very good this year, not a look in, and not a single game between two non-Victorian teams.
Because GWS doesn't have a large fan base, this has been explained many many times, the AFL fixture for maximum $ output first and foremost.

It's not a conspiracy.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Yes for $ reasons, not bias reasons.

Ah the old Vic line.... its the $ except when its not about the $.

AKA we won't do our due diligence to see if we could make more money by spreading the GF around (and growing the game Australia wide which by defn would bring in even more $$$) and we won't let Vic clubs sell games to cashed up interstate clubs because its not about the $.
 
Ah the old Vic line.... its the $ except when its not about the $.

AKA we won't do our due diligence to see if we could make more money by spreading the GF around (and growing the game Australia wide which by defn would bring in even more $$$) and we won't let Vic clubs sell games to cashed up interstate clubs because its not about the $.
Well the vic govt. made the AFL an offer they couldn't refuse, and that point is moot anyway.

Because.

It's

NOT

a

Conspiracy!
 
Friday night
Round 16 (Brisbane vs Melbourne)
Round 17 (Collingwood vs Essendon)
Round 18 (Collingwood vs Geelong)
Round 19 (Essendon vs Adelaide)
Round 20 (Carlton vs Port Adelaide)
Round 21 (Western Bulldogs vs Melbourne)
Round 22 (Sydney vs Collingwood)
Round 23 (Essendon vs Sydney)

So 16 teams playing on Friday from Round 16 to 23, and of those 16 teams only 5 of them are not Victorian. There are no Friday night games not involving a Victorian club and 3 games only involving Victorian teams.
It’s about money, not Victoria.
Collingwood, Melbourne, Essendon = TV money
GWS, Port Adelaide, Fremantle, Brisbane = not as much TV money

"We have big competitive match-ups in the marquee slots, including a string of blockbuster Friday night games heading into finals.”
 
No it's not funny, it actually makes sense, vic is the biggest market has the biggest member / fan bases apart from WC.

Again, this is NOT a conspiracy.
Agreed. Just economics.

Who cares that it’s meant to be a competition? Does it matter? Of course not.
 
They do pretend to have some semblance of an even fixture however, if not tv spots.
Really? Compared to the AFL?

Remember, most if not all clubs in those leagues are privately owned, and AFAIA the epl doesn't have a salary cap. Those leagues are even more $ driven than the AFL.

Also, leagues like the epl have far more tv avenues than what the AFL does for fans to watch.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Friday night
Round 16 (Brisbane vs Melbourne)
Round 17 (Collingwood vs Essendon)
Round 18 (Collingwood vs Geelong)
Round 19 (Essendon vs Adelaide)
Round 20 (Carlton vs Port Adelaide)
Round 21 (Western Bulldogs vs Melbourne)
Round 22 (Sydney vs Collingwood)
Round 23 (Essendon vs Sydney)

So 16 teams playing on Friday from Round 16 to 23, and of those 16 teams only 5 of them are not Victorian. There are no Friday night games not involving a Victorian club and 3 games only involving Victorian teams.
Round 18 had to be a MCG game.
Round 19 had to be a Marvel game.
Round 21 had to be a Marvel game.
Round 23 had to be a Marvel game.

So when given the choice, 3/4 matches were chose to be Interstate.
 
Really? Compared to the AFL?

Remember, most if not all clubs in those leagues are privately owned, and AFAIA the epl doesn't have a salary cap. Those leagues are even more $ driven than the AFL.

Also, leagues like the epl have far more tv avenues than what the AFL does for fans to watch.
You aren't seriously suggesting the contrived slop of the AFL fixture is akin to EPL and Bundesliga, with their perfect H&A balance. Unbelievable
 
You aren't seriously suggesting the contrived slop of the AFL fixture is akin to EPL and Bundesliga, with their perfect H&A balance. Unbelievable
Not so much the fixturing but other metrics that the AFL has like salary and soft caps, and that clubs are member owned not privately owned.

The only way to have a completely even fixture is have every club each once or twice or go to conference leagues, obviously the former two are not possible.
 
Not so much the fixturing but other metrics that the AFL has like salary and soft caps, and that clubs are member owned not privately owned.

The only way to have a completely even fixture is have every club each once or twice or go to conference leagues, obviously the former two are not possible.
The former is possible, you just cut the number of Victorian teams. It's been shown over and again that this is a rational answer to Vicbias. That doesn't mean it will happen, but it should
 
Not so much the fixturing but other metrics that the AFL has like salary and soft caps, and that clubs are member owned not privately owned.

The only way to have a completely even fixture is have every club each once or twice or go to conference leagues, obviously the former two are not possible.

I have my strong suspicions that clubs have ways around salary caps. I heard somewhere for instance years ago Geelong managed to find their players "cheap" property to buy. I don't know if this is true or not, but it would be an easy way around the cap if the AFL was not looking too hard, and it is easier for clubs in Victoria to do shady salary cap dealings.

I still remember how Travis Cloke somehow ended up on The Footy Show, as even for the Footy Show he was dumb. Only happened because Collingwood got him that gig to pad out his contract outside of the cap.
 
The former is possible, you just cut the number of Victorian teams. It's been shown over and again that this is a rational answer to Vicbias. That doesn't mean it will happen, but it should

I personally think the ideal competition would be

Victoria - 7 teams
Western Australia - 2 teams
South Australia - 2 teams
New South Wales - 2 teams
Queensland - 2 teams
Tasmania - 1 team
 
The former is possible, you just cut the number of Victorian teams. It's been shown over and again that this is a rational answer to Vicbias. That doesn't mean it will happen, but it should
It might address some of the issues that people complain about, but it'll make the go home stuff bigger as go home players spread over less clubs.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top