Roast 50/50-Rong Rucci Reckoning - The R-Files

Remove this Banner Ad

Aug 7, 2015
10,627
17,345
AFL Club
Adelaide
Without meaning to give more air to the guy, I thought it would be interesting to collate underhanded actions the guy has/may have made to the detriment to the Crows. I'd thought he was a bit of a raving nutter but it sounds like he has/may have done some rather sh!tty things against our club.

Facts would be good of course, but rumours would at least bring things to light for discussion.

So to get things rolling...


Encouraging things detrimental to AFC

As fans we need to absolutely smash into the media about this, social media, sports show etc. Don't let up, if you want change that's the only way it will happen. And for once Rucci will let it all be aired as it is smashing the Crows. I intend to do so this morning.
No, he won't.

Rucci wants the Crows to fail so he will be pushing for them to stay, I guarantee you that he'll be arguing that it's all just been bad luck rather than bad management.

The only reason I say this is that back in 2004 there was a group of us on here that weren't happy with the prospect of Neil Craig being given the job. We were very disgruntled about the process and the way we had been fobbed off by the club. We actually made an approach to Rucci thinking that he would love to have access to a group of disgruntled supporters that he could interview and write a hit piece on, but declined and said that he wasn't interested. He then started writing articles that massively pumped up Craig's tyres and endorsed him for the job so his agenda was clear, he will do what he can behind the scenes to help the worst option (in his eyes) come to fruition.

That's why I never buy any of Rucci's bullshit when he tries to argue that people only hate him because he applies a blowtorch to the club, once you look a bit deeper into things you find that he only ever strategically does it and it's always directed at some pointless crap with the sole purpose to try and make the club look bad.

Why write about Adelaide desperately needing to improve their fitness department when you can write about booing Robbie Gray.

THREADS

A challenge for Mr Rucci
Here is what Rucci wrote today

Craig plea: Let's stick together
By Michelangelo Rucci
27jul04

"CARETAKER Adelaide coach Neil Craig is boldly standing up to his emerging critics warning any factional infighting among the Crows will throw the club into damaging turmoil.

In the wake of Adelaide's record 141-point thrashing from AFL premier Brisbane at the Gabba on Saturday night, Craig has become the target of the Crows' members and fans' anger. Four games into his nine-match audition, Craig yesterday was fending e-mails from annoyed Adelaide fans and a campaign by the Crows' "unofficial match committee" to depose him.

The group – which includes an Adelaide member who sought a seat on the club board in December – has started a poll on the www.bigfooty.com Internet site asking if Craig should continue as coach. The count is heavily against him.

The assessments of his coaching are pointed.

This follows graffiti on the Adelaide clubhouse on Sunday morning labelling the Crows as "pathetic and disgracefull (sic)."

Craig yesterday faced up to the criticism of Adelaide's collapse at the Gabba saying: "I'm the senior coach and I accept total responsibility for that performance."

Asked of the vitriol he has faced since Saturday night, Craig said: "I will not enter a debate into what is right or wrong." But he warned any infighting – to match the boardroom turmoil at Richmond and Hawthorn – could quickly turn away potential candidates from the Adelaide coaching job.

"This is an opportunity for this football club to show total resolve – members included," Craig said.

"No-one at this football club is trying to pull the wool over the eyes of our supporters. Our members, supporters and sponsors must understand the players and the coaching group accept the responsibility to fix (this situation). If we are to make this a true football club, we need their support. Everyone is hurting at the moment. And everyone has to support each other. Members and supporters will not be happy. But we need their support."

Craig yesterday did not hide from any issue lingering from Saturday's defeat and flowing on to Friday night's clash with the Kangaroos at AAMI Stadium.

SHOULD have Craig flooded his defence while Brisbane launched its 21-goal second half?

"We did drop one or two back but not enough," responded Craig. "But do you lose by 23 goals or 17 goals then? If I had my time again, would I do it differently? Maybe. You don't learn too much when you are beaten by 23 goals." Craig added Adelaide's reaction this week would highlight how the Crows respond when challenged by adversity.

"If we are going to be any good in the future and be among the best of the best," said Craig, "we have to handle a whole range of difficulties and become resilient."

HIS confidence as a coach?

"If I am going to survive," said Craig, "if I am going to be any good as a coach, it is important I have the skills to handle adversity.

"The last thing the playing group needs to see is the coach down in the dumps and moping about the club."

DID Adelaide have more questions or answers on its squad a month into his audition? "A lot more answers," Craig said. "In the next five weeks those answers will be put on the table and a clear picture will emerge on the profile of this squad."

HAD Craig been approached by either Hawthorn or Richmond to apply for its jobs? "Not in the last 24 hours," he said."

Pity he only brushed over the subject about many of us not wanting Craig, at least bigfooty.com got a mention though. Its a pity that he didnt elaborate more on why we dont want him.

Mr Rucci says: Show your faces
Re: Re: Mr Rucci says: Show your faces
Great point !!!!!!!

According to Rucci, the saviour is Neil Craig. So what is he on about

What also doesnt make sense in all of this about Rucci's support of Neil Craig is that

1. Rucci has constantly claimed that Adelaide need a total cleanout, yet he is suddenly supporting 110% the appointment of someone who has been in the Adelaide Football Club system for years and a person who has already shown a loyalty to the players about not sacking and being hesitant about trading. Neil Craig will keep the status quo which totally contradicts what Rucci has been claiming the crows require.

2. Rucci is always mr critical when it comes to all aspects of the Adelaide Football Club and his allegience to the PAFC and the enjoyment he gets out of the failure of the AFC are both blantantly clear. So why suddenly is he apparently looking out for the best interests of the Adelaide Football Club.

3. Why did he pick on every aspect of the way Adelaide had played football under Ayres, but has failed to indentify the current flaws in how was are playing under Craig. The lack of the skill and the fact that Adelaide are still playing very wide when attacking (which is an aspect Rucci used time and time again against Ayres) Rucci has appeared to have decided to put his blinkers on and pretend that they dont exist and he refuses to write a negative word against Craig or his coaching style.

I just emailed this to Steven Trigg
I have been a season ticket holder since 1992 (ticket number xxxxx) and been going to most of the home games since 1991. I would generally refer to myself as a die hard Adelaide supporter and love the club (I lined up for three days to get a ticket for the 98 Grand Final so it speaks for itself).
For the first time ever I totally disagree with a decision the Adelaide Football Club has made. This particular decision relates to the appointment of Neil Craig (if it is indeed true) as senior coach past this season.
Let me put forward the following information;
1. The large majority of the callers on 5AA over the past few weeks have opposed Neil Craig's appointment and these callers, including Graham Cornes, know beyond a shadow of a doubt that Neil Craig wasn't the best coach available to the Adelaide Football Club.
2. The poll on www.afl.com.au as to who crows fans believe is the better person they prefer for the job (there was over 2.500 votes I believe) and it was hugely in favour of Rodney Eade over Neil Craig (from memory 78% to 22%).
3. The crowds have been down, surely if Neil Craig was the big hometown hero that everyone wants to get behind and support, why are people staying home and not at AAMI stadium???
4. The performances of the team in my opinion and the opinion of others since Craig tenure is that things appear to be worse than when Garry Ayres was there. Many tactical flaws in Craig's tweaked game plan have already been noticed by supporters and many of the ugly aspects of Garry Ayres' game plan still remain.
Lets face it, the search for a new coach has been a total farce. Firstly there was the meek attempt toward approaching Terry Wallace, confirmed by Terry Wallace on 5AA. Now we have been made aware that Wayne Jackson (important to know as he was the only outsider in this process) wasn't at Rodney Eade's interview. We then find out that Jackson, surprisingly, was available next day for Craig's interview. Perhaps this was to make sure that there were no stumbling blocks to Craig's appointment, I guess the truth behind this will never come out. You will undoubtedly disagree, but Craig's appointment was announced to the public weeks ago and yet you still continued to toy with your supporters making statments like Neil Craig wasn't a certainly for the job when this clearly was false. His performances on the field haven't helped his cause and yet we are still to believe that you went through the process and Neil Craig was the best candidate. At the end of the day it seems that the AFC believes that Garry Ayres was the only person responsible for the downfall of the club, which is totally laughable. Even Michelangelo Rucci was pushing for Craig's appointment, he is the biggest critic of this football club and enjoys seeing the AFC in turmoil, the day he backs someone in Adelaide you really have to question his motives. Maybe Rucci can see what a majority of the Adelaide supporters can about the future of the club under Neil Craig hence the reasons why he pushed so hard for his appointment. He has already made an attempt to make contact with a group of disillusioned supporters (dubbed by him as the "Unofficial Match Committee"). It is well known that he has his ear to the ground and monitors many of the outlets Adelaide supporters have to voice their praise and concern (5AA and www.Bigfooty.com) and he would know that the Craig appointment already has the wolves beginning to circle the club and by trying to make contact with this group he is obviously going to try and get a major story from this.
The fact is that Neil Craig's appointment goes against what a large majority of your supporters wanted, which I find interesting as one minute the AFC are placing ads in the Advertiser pleading with supporters to attend or give your ticket to someone who can, then you (the AFC board) turn around and tear the heart out of 80% of your supporter base by appointing a coach that we don't believe was the best man for the job. While I have been at all the games this season, if Neil Craig is announced I will not be attending another AFC match this season and WILL NOT pass my ticket to someone else to use. We don't have the power to vote for the board, so not putting bums on seats is our only form of protest!! It is going to take more than just an ad in the paper to get people to the football, maybe if you were in touch with your supporters and understood what they wanted you wouldn't be losing them. All you have to do is listen to the callers on 5AA to know this is going to and has already impacted very negatively on the club and is going to be a real public relations nightmare if this fails when you have made a decision against most YOUR supporters better judgement.
Let me just say in closing that I hope the AFC board and Neil Craig proves me wrong with this appointment, though if the appointment fails you would clearly understand that a majority of the members of the Adelaide Football Club will expect your resignation and that of the other board members involved in this process. This appointment has now placed the board and Neil Craig aka "the boys club" under the microscope and I wish you well for long task of trying to win your supporters back over.

Thanking you for your time reading this email.


Todd xxxxxxxxx
A dishevelled and disappointed supporter
Here is Trigg's response, pretty poor I might add

Thanks for your thoughts.
By all means question the credentials of candidates/appointees...but do
not bring into question the integrity of the process or (by association)
the people involved.
The people here want badly to be successful. Do you really think a
decision would be made for convenience, or because it's easy?
Please don't tell me that one person in the media (with a personal
agenda) is going to know better - or have ALL the facts at his disposal!

Steven Trigg Chief Executive Officer
Adelaide Football Club
PO Box 10
West Lakes SA 5021
I responded to Trigg's email with this.......

Firstly let me thank you for responding to my email this morning, I had not expected a response and it shows character and a willingness to listen to your supporters. While you obviously wouldn't agree with my points, I am happy with the fact that you at least listened to my point of view and responded.

To be honest, I have tried very hard to believe this was a fair and just process. It honestly makes me sick to my stomach being such a staunch supporter of this club to feel the need question the credibility and legitimacy of the process. I have raised some legitimate points that have occurred in relation to this process that appear to show some contradiction to the theory of it being an open unbiased process. I have presented some facts Mr Trigg and maybe it shouldn't be a case of saying DON'T QUESTION THE PROCESS maybe it should be asking the question of why are a majority of your supporters questioning the process? Even Graham Cornes is suspect of the process, so this certainly isn't just an isolated case of one person's beliefs.

Believe me when I say that I am also one of the many people who want this club to be as successful as it can possibly be. I have loved this club since 91, from the jubilation of the two premierships to lows of 94,95 and 96 its been a bit of a bumpy ride at times, but has been immensely enjoyable to me personally. Hence the reason why I wanted and am so emotional about the best available coach being appointed to the Adelaide Football Club to ensure the long term success of this team, both on field and off.

At the end of the day, the decision has been made rightly or wrongly and we (the supporters) have to make some decisions about how we intend to handle this situation, obviously not buying season tickets isn't going to help as many people are on the waiting list so it will not impact financially on the club. People have already discussed some type of protest action, whether it be by having signs at the football, email campaigns or by continuing to voice their opinions and disapproval on 5AA in relation to the decision. I personally invite you stop by on the Adelaide Football Club forum on www.bigfooty.com or maybe listen in today on 5AA to hear what your supporters think, you would find that many are hurting at the moment. I also hope you don't dismiss this negative stigma as just being "a reaction to Adelaide's unsuccessful season" as this isn't the case, I personally would support and back the AFC 100% through a 0-22 season if the best possible person was there coaching the club.

As for Rucci I agree 100% that he appear to have his own personal anti-AFC agenda, but at the end of the day if he is going to provide an avenue in the media for supporters in our quest towards providing the Adelaide Football Club with more accountability for its decisions then I am sure that many, including myself, will jump at the offer.

Certainly there are appear to be some very interesting times ahead and as I said before, I wish you and the club well in your endeavours in this time of what some people have labelled as "one of the darkest days for Adelaide supporters" and I hope you can win back the confidence of your supporters (myself included).

Thank you

Suspected Roach BF alias accounts

bighawk1961 ... >>
Dixie Normous


Related threads

Rucci makes up a lot of bullsh*t


Re. Dangerfield...
So he played 3 years of TAC cup. Not many people would know or remember that he played tac cup his first season with the crows. That'd be a league first.
There was quite a bit of controversy about allowing him to play that 3rd year of TAC. There was a bit of angst from opposition clubs.

During school holidays he would come over. From memory he played a couple of games for West Adelaide before making his debut against Essendon late in the year.
From memory Rucci was also trying behind the scenes to get him banned from playing TAC. I think at the time he was trying to argue that there was a precedent with another player where he wasn't able to play in the TAC so Rucci wrote one of his infamous "seeking clarification" letters to the AFL.

Re. Bryce Gibbs & Brett Burton...
Gibbs old man hates us. He had the AFL change the alignment with Port to the crows for Glenelg players who played 200 games for the 2001 father - son rule change. Problem was the SANFL and crows stuffed up and Ross didn't play 200 games during the eligibility period. It was the Port board that discovered this in late 2005/early 2006. We also discovered Ebert wasn't eligible for Port under the 2001 father son rule. Then discussion moved to the Adelaide board. Rucci got hold of it and asked the AFL questions and the rest is history.
In the words of Rucci, the Crows have proven that they don't need Dangerfield and also that they don't need Crouch either. He claims that Thompson is set to continue on in 2017 and his spot in the side is under question and suggests that the Crows should be courageous and trade Crouch.

In other words Rucci has seen how well we're traveling so far and is worried about how much better our midfield would be with a fit and firing Brouch so he is trying to plant the seed in the media in the hope that it puts Crouch on the recruiting radar of opposition clubs.

He usually plays up the devils advocate position when it comes to Adelaide, it's his way of trolling us.
To win the flag, we need go up a level in the midfield & that means getting the best out of Brad crouch!

It's funny how you can never trust Rooch's motives... & he wonders why Afc have little to do with him as possible.
It's hard to trust someone that went to the AFL to stop us getting Bryce Gibbs, reported to the AFL that Burton had carry over points so that he would miss a showdown game while deliberately turning a blind eye a few weeks later when the same thing happened with a Port player and also how he tried to get the AFL to not allow Dangerfield to play in the TAC Cup the year that he remained in Victoria.

That's just the tip of the iceberg with Rucci trying to screw us over, thankfully the club finally woke up and has started treating him with the disdain that he deserves.
20171014
Gibbs was initially classified as eligible to be recruited to the Crows as a father/son selection because his father Ross played enough games in the SANFL with Glenelg during the qualifying period (which I think was pre 1991). A few weeks before the draft Rucci wrote a piece declaring that some of those games were pre-season games and if they were excluded, Gibbs would not qualify as a F/S, which is how the AFL adjudicated it.

Of course, Rucci often forgets to remind people that Port were able to recruit Brett Ebert as a F/S a year or two prior and if judged using the same criteria, should have been ruled ineligible as well. But by then he was already on Port's list so it was too late.

... then the hypocrisy
...
Basically he is like a dog with a bone and will sit there raking the muck in the hope that he finds something that will somehow damage the AFC.

Now none of this would be important if his belief of "seeking the truth" applied to both teams, but it clearly doesn't. When it comes to Port, as you correctly point out, he either tries to sweep things under the carpet or never reports about them. He once tried to justify himself by coming up with a lame excuse by saying, "there's enough people in media already that can report on these issues about Port, it's not always up to me to report everything". Yet when it's the Crows he always makes the argument that he's obliged to report on it.

The disparity between how he reports about both teams is evidence of a clear pattern of behavior and a very telling and obvious sign of his agenda.
You are forgetting the time where he calls out Gibb's Father for playing not enough games for his club during the f/s period however failing to recognise that Russell Ebert didn't either during said period for his son Brett.
Yeah Geoffa brought that one up and don't worry I haven't forgotten that one either.
I don't think that Rucci wrote the article, but from what I was told he was definitely the person went to the AFL about it.


.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Since Rucci is already having a wank while reading this thread, I'll give him some pictures to wank to
vgNFQGs.jpg
 
we are officially screwed now - abandon ship!!

Todays Rooch article said:
ADELAIDE has arrived as an AFL power.

No longer are the Crows the image of mediocrity that led to coach Brenton Sanderson’s sacking at the end of the 2014 season.

Adelaide has moved beyond the “feel-good” story of Australian sport as the Crows defied the emotional strain to pass the greatest test of adversity after coach Phil Walsh’s death 12 months ago.

Now Adelaide is judged — and admired — in the very way that defines all the Crows sought when they made critical decisions to become an AFL powerhouse in September 2014.

Collingwood midfielder Adam Treloar’s post-match remark at Adelaide Oval on Saturday night that the Crows are the best team in the AFL today is a critical turning point in Adelaide’s ambitions — and status.

It is another of the amazing AFL tales that highlight how a club can be on its knees — and in crisis — but with a united front emerge as a genuine premiership contender. And no-one can doubt Adelaide’s resilience from a chapter that could have easily broken a football club.

Credibility. Respect. Admiration of the nation — for its football now. As Adelaide sits second on the AFL ladder — with an eight-game winning streak — the Crows are all they wanted to be when the grand “elite” plan was put together after chairman Rob Chapman stood on Adelaide Oval’s southern plaza to call an end to mediocrity, after missing final series in consecutive seasons.

Now the ultimate question begs: What is Adelaide to make of this hard-earned opportunity?

The Crows could claim the minor premiership for the first time since 2005 — and on the back of a club-best 14-game winning streak (rewriting a record set in 2005).

The Crows should grasp a top-two finish — and with home qualifying and preliminary finals advance to the club’s first AFL grand final since the 1998 triumph.

This is the opportunity Port Adelaide found in 2014 when it kicked itself out of the grand final to allow Hawthorn find the escape route in another tight-finish preliminary final.

It is the moment — as first-year Crows coach Don Pyke lived last year with West Coast — that granted the Eagles a grand final appearance.

And in a game that repeatedly warns that a good year is not always followed by a great season, Adelaide cannot let this moment slip. It has a team — as Treloar noted — that can win the AFL premiership today.

Now the Crows have to deal with 12 weeks of high expectation.

After all that captain Taylor Walker and his players endured last season — to deliver two finals appearances at the MCG under caretaker coach Scott Camporeale — such “normal” football expectations should roll off the Crows’ collective backs.

This is a significant moment in the Adelaide Football Club journey.

A club that has been so determined to “move on” from the tragedy of July last year — while not forgetting the goal set by Walsh — is now judged in the way every AFL team wants to be seen. Sympathy is overtaken by admiration.

Opportunity is before the Crows.

And as Mark Bickley, the captain who led his 1997-98 Crows to strike when opportunity counted most in September, says, this is the moment Adelaide cannot let slip.
 
we are officially screwed now - abandon ship!!
Pathetic passive aggressive flog.

Under the guise of appearing complimentary he now looks to build the pressure associated with sitting 2nd.

As the weeks roll by watch for articles pointing out our lack of finals success and how "the pressure of finals failure is building"

Scum of the earth
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

The whole point of his article is:-

Now the Crows have to deal with 12 weeks of high expectation.
He's hoping to create that expectation - stupid idiot doesn't realize we aren't the lemmings down the road who reckon the GWS game is in the bag !
 
Get off our bandwagon you flog Rucci
A 'positive' article. Poor Rooch. Damned if he does damned if he doesn't.

Anyone else think Rooch is trying to create that 'expectation'....wait, while i was typing this i glanced up and saw this...
He's hoping to create that expectation - stupid idiot doesn't realize we aren't the lemmings down the road who reckon the GWS game is in the bag !

He ain't fooling' anyone.

oh...and this

Pathetic passive aggressive flog.

Under the guise of appearing complimentary he now looks to build the pressure associated with sitting 2nd.

As the weeks roll by watch for articles pointing out our lack of finals success and how "the pressure of finals failure is building"

Scum of the earth

The whole point of his article is:-

Now the Crows have to deal with 12 weeks of high expectation.

Yep. Not fooling anyone. campaigner!
 
think the worst thing he's ever written (that i saw) was his relentless bullying of neil craig in his columns for no particular reason. and not just about him as a coach, but as a person. thought that that sort of stuff is always immature and just uncalled for, not matter what side it's about. leave that kind of s**t for the dregs of the internet, not as the chief football writer in a footy mad state.

glad that both clubs have basically frozen him out. he's an absolute bottom feeder who clearly gets off on character attacks and trying to make himself look like the big man.
 
Rucci operates on a narrative that he wants to pursue with both clubs, Port and the Crows. My information comes from a board member at Port Adelaide in 2011 so I can only assume that if he was willing to do it to Port he would have almost certainly done it to the Crows.

My source told me Rucci was famous for extorting the clubs for information or he will run with fake stories to feed his narrative. The clubs can't fight those stories because he will hide behind fake sources that he says are out there. Now considering he seems to be on Ports side at present I can only come to the conclusion that Port pulled him aside and offered him a deal for peace. I presume to remove as much negative press as possible so they can build the membership base. The Crows don't need to build their membership base because it just grows no matter the press. Judging by his views, I think it's obvious the Crows have and always will just ignore him no matter the crap he writes.

But yeah believe me when I say PAFC hated him just as much as the Crows....back then anyway.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top