To the WCE board specifically.To Bigfooty?
He should stop following Black JuJu.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To the WCE board specifically.To Bigfooty?
Haha I think I changed it in the week after the mark being taken - someone posted a HQ pic of the mark and it loaded on my phone right on the ‘foot to face’ part of the shot. Too good not to use haha
To Bigfooty?
Right behind Barrass and Sheed?Shuey was named third best for us by afl.com.au
Shuey was named third best for us by afl.com.au
Pushing in the back with the foot is definitely worse than pushing in the back with the hand. Dont see any problem of the free kick.2 articles about reiwaldt studs up one afl other the herald scum saying its a stupid rule .
Neither article mentions the studs up incident with reiwaldt again in the same game that sent sheppard to the bench in a lot of pain after studs up into shep knee .
The rule was bought in for that exact reason .
Studs up 3 times in one game from rewaldt one causing injury. This is something the MRP should be looking at
Ditto. The examples today could have just as easily been called push in the back instead of "studs up". They were obvious frees either way.Pushing in the back with the foot is definitely worse than pushing in the back with the hand. Dont see any problem of the free kick.
Amazed it wasn't a 50m penalty tbh.Jacks tantrum at the umpire after the first one was great
He got away with a couple of marks on the weekend too (ie. Gov/Hurn had first hands on it)...He gets away with a lot of mouthing off because he is Jack.
My recollection is that Gawn tried to headbutt Ryan's studs.To be fair, Ryan went studs up into Gawn's face and I'm sure none of you were calling for a free in that instance.
Recollection is that the initial contact was with the knee and not the studs. Whereas Jack is making space with his studs.To be fair, Ryan went studs up into Gawn's face and I'm sure none of you were calling for a free in that instance.
I felt that the first one was awarded for a push, it looked to me that's what the umpire ment. Fair enough too, otherwise everyone would just push out with their legs.Ditto. The examples today could have just as easily been called push in the back instead of "studs up". They were obvious frees either way.
Good old Eddy loved calling the goals for Richmond before they were kicked.
"Rewoldt takes the mark and will go back and slot it"
For a point you numb nut.
Eddie goes too far the other way to distance himself from being the president sometimes as most Magpie fans wanted Wce to win for ladder position..
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Good old Eddy loved calling the goals for Richmond before they were kicked.
"Rewoldt takes the mark and will go back and slot it"
For a point you numb nut.
Have just read on the AFL website that after Hardwick complained about the two decisions that went against the Riewoldt the AFL in their wisdom have decided to alter the interpretation, “ there is a need to adjust the interpretation of rough conduct free kicks relating to the use of studs in marking contests and will make this change effective immediately” Steve Hocking said on Monday.Recollection is that the initial contact was with the knee and not the studs. Whereas Jack is making space with his studs.
Don't mind the rule. If they get rid of it then we need to start training using the studs up to create space.