Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 81,444
- 81,991
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
No, your ruckman McEvoy is older...Sloane is older than our entire midfield.
The average age of the Hawks midfield is probably older too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, your ruckman McEvoy is older...Sloane is older than our entire midfield.
Wingers are midfielders in my opinion.Smith isn't a midfielder and if you're bringing wings into it then Sholl also has to be included. Sure seedsman is old but with a 21 and 24 year old coming up to be the main wingers it still isnt a problem.
McEvoy won't play as a main ruck.No, your ruckman McEvoy is older...
The average age of the Hawks midfield is probably older too.
Schoenberg uses the ball better than Worpel & has wonderful vision.Schoenberg averaged 18 touches a game this year in his second year Worpel’s lowest game was 19 touches and he averaged 26.5 touches. Clearances (139-67) and contested possessions (265-163) also well in favour of Worps.
The big change is the role Worps has been given since 2019. Whenever he’s given the opportunity he’s taken it.
Obviously Schoenberg has time to improve but he’s got a way to go. And might well end up the better player but comparing 2nd years there is no contest.
Oh I think most adelaide fans agree he just didnt have the tank for a full season, he just seemed to get a bit puffed. I'm not too worried with Burgo managing his fitness.Wingers are midfielders in my opinion.
Sholl is a pretty decent player, hard runner and a good kick but his form dropped late last year (maybe just cooked?)
Just like Sloane is likely to play mainly outside the midfield... so similar scenario.McEvoy won't play as a main ruck.
Reeves will or Lynch. McEvoy is merely a tap out for one of them playing forward.
As i mentioned, Seedsman is also older than most of our mids and was arguably one of Adelaides best players and if AA sides picked wingers he'd be arguably first picked or close to it.Thanks Sandra…. What about every other player on each list?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Yeah, he's an unreal runner so he shouldn't have too many issues long term.Oh I think most adelaide fans agree he just didnt have the tank for a full season, he just seemed to get a bit puffed. I'm not too worried with Burgo managing his fitness.
Sloane last year played everywhere, you'd see him in the middle, on a wing or half forward.Just like Sloane is likely to play mainly outside the midfield... so similar scenario.
There is so much wrong with this post, that I don't know where to start...As i mentioned, Seedsman is also older than most of our mids and was arguably one of Adelaides best players and if AA sides picked wingers he'd be arguably first picked or close to it.
Seedsman 30
Brodie Smith 30
Sloane 32
Laird 28
Crouch 26 (turns 27)
Keays 24 (turning 25)
Dawson 24 (turns 25)
Outside of these players
Shoenberg is a good young player, proven that he's good and will likely play alot of games and at a pretty high standard.
Josh Rachele will turn into a MID-FWD and looks to be a player.
There's some others who've been drafted like Zac Taylor who looks he could be a handy player, i am actually a big fan, surprised he dropped that far.
Berry showed a little, he's a tough player and loves a tackle.
There's Cook aswell who looks talented.
Aswell as Pedlar who i like.
Hately too but unsure on him atm.
Point is, look at the ages of alot of the main stays in the Adelaide midfield last year or the players that will play in 2022.
Seeds will lock a wing, Smith will play wing but also HB.
Sloane will play probably everywhere as a leader.
Laird will lock a mid spot.
Crouch fit will def play as a mid.
Keays also locked in as a mid.
Dawson wing/mid but could also spend time as a half back, very versatile so.
Also Schoenberg.
And the kids who may, Berry will, Rachele starts FWD, Cook i'd suspect gets more games, Pedlar too and Hately unsure.
If you look at ours atleast in my opinion.
Titch 28 (turns 29)
Jaeger 27 (turns 28)
Are the main two older midfielders, there's others like Howe but i suspect he'll be more depth (26)
Wingard MID-FWD (28)
The likely demographic of Hawks midfield has 2-3 late 20s players.
But they likely have more kids playing aswell, with less in the 25 range.
25 is probably around the time you want your players to prime for a flag, to start gelling together. Abit like how Melbourne went with Clarry (arguably earlier tho)
I guess it depends how many kids you play aswell as how experienced the players are, it doesn't matter if they are late 20s teaching the kids or if it's a range of kids, mid 20s and late 20s (or a couple 30s.)
Ben McEvoy got 370 hit outs last year.Sloane last year played everywhere, you'd see him in the middle, on a wing or half forward.
McEvoy is definitely not a non-ruckman, but it's up in the air as to what percentage he spends in there going forward, with Reeves and Lynch knocking on the door.Ben McEvoy got 370 hit outs last year.
Not bad for a non-ruckman.
Just saying.
So you agree that you do have the oldest player in the middle.McEvoy is definitely not a non-ruckman, but it's up in the air as to what percentage he spends in there going forward, with Reeves and Lynch knocking on the door.
Obviously every fan has a different view on the team they want or whatever.I have our midfield something like as follows, including rotations...
Ruck: O'Brien (26) with Thilthorpe (19) relieving
Inside mids: Laird (28), Keays (24), Crouch (26), Schoenberg (20)
Outside mids: Dawson (24), Seedsman (30), Sholl (21)
No one needs replacing anything soon, except Seedman in a few years.
He's been a star.View attachment 1316732
He sits 13th all time for hit outs.
He is 100% a ruckman.
But he is also a defender
and a forward.
No it's as i explained it.So you agree that you do have the oldest player in the middle.
You got there eventually...
He won't play defense ever again, but he will play forward. Like last year.He's been a star.
I don't reckon Sam will have him playing as a defender or forward too often though. That was crazy Clarko really trying to stem the bleeding at times, and although it came off I don't see it happening much under Mitchell. Unless resting of course.
You have compared apples with oranges, as you have picked a future team, not your likely starting team.Obviously every fan has a different view on the team they want or whatever.
I'll do it for what it likely will be late in the year, rather than early as we don't know when draftees debut and so on (even tho i suspect we have a fair few debut early).
Mine would be:
Ruck: Ned Reeves (23) with Mitch Lewis (23) relieving (Or Lynch if he plays.)
Inside Mids: Tom Mitchell (28), Jaeger O'Meara (27), James Worpel (Just turned 23), Josh Ward (18)
Outside Mids: Lachlan Bramble (23), Day/Scrimshaw (One will move up and Day is 20, Scrimshaw 23), Dan Howe?
There's a bunch who are around this (older depth, or pushing young players).
Connor MacDonald likely debuts early as a balanced mid, Finn Maginness likely to feature early and has been very good in the pre season so far.
Connor Nash who showed a fair bit late in the year as a super tall mid option (almost 200cm), Jai Newcombe who's in his first afl pre season and who showed a bit again last year. Connor Downie looks good, has developed his non pref a fair amount, still looks built and looks good, very Isaac Smith with his absolute cannon of a left (Wing option).
Sam Butler abit like Rachele likely to start forward when he plays and move into the guts.
Ned Long who already looks like a prime aged 25 year old in the nick of his life, huge man and looks pretty good.
And as a i said Lynch may play, could be early or later. Could replace McEvoy or he could fill in if Reeves is injured, or if he pushes past. Idk he looks talented and showed abit in the few games he has played.
There's the mid tier with Dan Howe (if he is in the side or not idk), Tom Phillips (also about 25)
Shiels aswell but unlikely to get games as a mid, very unlikely and more likely to eventually be depth and as a half forward option.
We also might see CJ (22) come up to a wing. There will likely be 1/2 half backs to a wing.
Sloane is 33 in March.So you agree that you do have the oldest player in the middle.
You got there eventually...
Either he will play in the ruck or not.No it's as i explained it.
FWD/RUC rather than RUC/FWD.
Will play a fu** load forward, while letting the ruck whoever is playing rest.
Lol, wrong again.Sloane is 33 in March.
The difference is Sam is a new coach in his first season, we've seen how your coach wants to run it (atleast last year with last years players).You have compared apples with oranges, as you have picked a future team, not your likely starting team.
I could have done that my bringing in the likes of Berry, Pedlar, Jones, McHenry, Hamill, Hately, etc... & looky here our side is younger.
...Either he will play in the ruck or not.
Given he had 370 hitouts last year, I think it is very likely he will spend considerable time in the ruck.
It's hilarious in your named side you named 3 ruckmen ahead of him.
No one believes this lol.