Banter The Adelaide Board Politics/COVID Thread Part 2 (WARNING NOT FOR THE FAINT-HEARTED)

[CrowFrenzy]

But Doctor Fauci said it was okay.

 

[Slippery Pete]

 

[CrowFrenzy]

You might remember….


But sure, your view is that all other things being equal it isn’t better for a kid to be raised by his biological mother and father, and in fact it is optional to even know who they are.

You stick to your reality, grasshopper.

There's the good science and then there's the bad science.

 

[Maddogmetro]

You might remember….


But sure, your view is that all other things being equal it isn’t better for a kid to be raised by his biological mother and father, and in fact it is optional to even know who they are.

You stick to your reality, grasshopper.

It is quite concerning how far you are stretching your argument just to maintain your homophobic views.

 

[Slippery Pete]

It is quite concerning how far you are stretching your argument just to maintain your homophobic views.

Is it your view or not, trolley boy? I’m on the clock here

 

[1970crow]

Vader is right. He's got so many cases going on, no of which could of happened whilst he was in Office

Especially if he'd managed to pull off his coup.

Edit - in office not court.

If Vader was right, then trump has been in prison. How can you seriously read his post and conclude he was right? I know you can miss points by a fair way, but surely you can't seriously contort your thinking that somehow Vader being right isn't entirely connected to whether trump actually went to prison after not being president.

 

[1970crow]

It's funny how much you got wrong in such a brief comment.

While responding to my comment which explained that THE REASON YOU DECIDED YOU GET THE VACCINE IS IRRELEVANT.

And by having a vaccinated population, it literally did save people, in several different ways. If you're too dumb to get that, nobody can help you.

It saved the people that got it, people getting it didn't save anyone else. That you can't understand this is unsurprising though. You still the need to feel some kind of moral superiority over people who mad3 their own decision for their own reasons. And those decisions influenced the rate of spread and outcome of the pandemic not one bit. And neither did they put their or your nanna at any greater risk of catching covid.

but you may know that, given your aggression. It's an uncomfortable truth for you as vax superiority over 'anti-vaxxers' is the only feeling of competence that you genuinely own. Keep it, it's a good look on you.

 

[1970crow]

That sounds like a robust risk assessment.

covid vax risk assessment is pretty simple. If yours was robust, then you did it wrong.

 

[Crow till I die]

There's the good science and then there's the bad science.

When anyone tells you the science is settled..be sceptical

 

[1970crow]

the forever excuse, "there's no manual for this". ******* dead$h!t public servants. It's impossible to do a risk assessment that identifies the likelihood of outbreak coming from the workers that are actually in the vicinity of the people known to be infected. Nope, until it happens, a public servant couldn't possibly predict that it was possible.

That's the type of people that led our response.

 

[Maddogmetro]

It saved the people that got it, people getting it didn't save anyone else. That you can't understand this is unsurprising though. You still the need to feel some kind of moral superiority over people who mad3 their own decision for their own reasons. And those decisions influenced the rate of spread and outcome of the pandemic not one bit. And neither did they put their or your nanna at any greater risk of catching covid.

but you may know that, given your aggression. It's an uncomfortable truth for you as vax superiority over 'anti-vaxxers' is the only feeling of competence that you genuinely own. Keep it, it's a good look on you.

It has nothing to do with a feeling of superiority. You just made that up. Sounds like maybe you are dealing with your own feelings of perceived superiority. Just more projection from you.

And still can't believe that, after it being explained to you in simple terms, you simply cannot grasp that a vaccinated population was critical to maintaining a functioning health system. You are so narrow in your views that you refuse to even consider anything other than the most simple of analysis. It's mind-blowing how ignorant and dumb you are.

 

[Maddogmetro]

Is it your view or not, trolley boy? I’m on the clock here

Lol you're a ******* idiot.

 

[Slippery Pete]

covid vax risk assessment is pretty simple. If yours was robust, then you did it wrong.

The people who swallowed the idea that “vertical consumption” was killing people are here to tell us about robust risk assessments.

 

[Slippery Pete]

Lol you're a ******* idiot.

I’ve always wanted to know, what happened to those trolleys you use to put a coin in to unlock?

I liked that idea, why did they get rid of that

 

[Maddogmetro]

The people who swallowed the idea that “vertical consumption” was killing people are here to tell us about robust risk assessments.

That you cannot understand the reason for that restriction says a lot about you Slippery.

You are incapable of any analysis other than the information directly in front of you. You are a simple person.

 

[Slippery Pete]

a vaccinated population was critical to maintaining a functioning health system.

Only among the cohort who were actually at risk of hospitalization.

 

[Slippery Pete]

That you cannot understand the reason for that restriction says a lot about you Slippery.

You are incapable of any analysis other than the information directly in front of you. You are a simple person.

What was it? Maybe you can explain it

 

[Maddogmetro]

When anyone tells you the science is settled..be sceptical

The science behind evolution is settled.

The science on germ theory is settled.

The science on the effects of gravity at a local level is settled.

The science behind the ability to create flight from thrust and lift through the use of aeroplanes is settled.

The science behind the ability to use combustion engines for transportation is settled.

Are you sceptical?

 

[Slippery Pete]

When anyone tells you the science is settled..be sceptical

 

[Maddogmetro]

Lol nice boomer-level joke Slippery.

Got any more twitter screenshots from conservative dickheads to post?

 

[Slippery Pete]

Lol nice boomer-level joke Slippery.

Got any more twitter screenshots from conservative dickheads to post?

What was the medical reason behind banning people from standing up in pubs?

While you’re at it, perhaps you can also explain the Covid reason behind avoiding a football that flies into the crowd?

 

[Crow till I die]

The science behind evolution is settled.

The science on germ theory is settled.

The science on the effects of gravity at a local level is settled.

The science behind the ability to create flight from thrust and lift through the use of aeroplanes is settled.

The science behind the ability to use combustion engines for transportation is settled.

Are you sceptical?

Nice cherry picked examples

What about lockdown science

What about the science behind drugs to treat illness, like Thalidomide

What about the the science behind products like Asbestos as a suitable building material

Science evolves and is never settled and beware of anyone who says it is

 

[Maddogmetro]

What was the medical reason behind banning people from standing up in pubs?

While you’re at it, perhaps you can also explain the Covid reason behind avoiding a football that flies into the crowd?

The reason was not this dumb view you have that they thought that standing up made you catch it easier or whatever the * you thought.

Every decision was a risk assessment. If cannot drink standing, there would be less people in close vicinity, and people would be more likely to stay seated in their own groups, rather than walking around and increasing the chance of spread. It is literally a numbers game, and the line had to be drawn somewhere, and that is one of the places the line was drawn.

The second question is not anything I have commented on before - so why would you bother even writing it?

You are obviously one of those people that think you know every view that everyone has by knowing their view on one topic. Just because you let your views be determined by your 'tribe' doesn't mean everyone else is the same. Maybe try having some thoughts of your own.

 

[Crow till I die]

What was the medical reason behind banning people from standing up in pubs?

While you’re at it, perhaps you can also explain the Covid reason behind avoiding a football that flies into the crowd?

This will be fun

 

[Maddogmetro]

Nice cherry picked examples

What about lockdown science

What about the science behind drugs to treat illness, like Thalidomide

What about the the science behind products like Asbestos as a suitable building material

Science evolves and is never settled and beware of anyone who says it is

How is that cherry-picked? You literally made the statement that if someone says the science is settled, you should be sceptical.

If you are now saying that only applies when you want it to, THAT is cherry-picking.

Nice own goal dh.

Science does evolve, I agree. But if your view is that nothing can ever be taken to be accepted ever, despite mountains of evidence supporting the conclusion, and you need to deny everything that has been proven by science, what do you believe?

You are taking scientific method and applying only a fraction of the concept to suit your narrative. That's not how science works.