List Mgmt. 2022 Trade Thread - Part III

Remove this Banner Ad

GC list manager on Ben Long, had discussion today with St Kilda but we still have a bit of work to do on that. Hope we are driving a hard bargain.
 
Cant see why anyone would want to go to north,except for the $,they are going to be very poor side again and in the future.Does HC just looking for the money go imo no
 

Log in to remove this ad.

lewdogs said:
What's the deal with Acres? Just read Freo will deal him to Carlton for a future third, so basically nothing. Is he that bad? Thought he was good for them in the finals.
Click to expand...
Traded twice for a packet of chips.

One club not valuing makes sense. Two clubs not valuing him and I think the obvious conclusion is that he may not actually be that good.
 
saintsmania said:
GC list manager on Ben Long, had discussion today with St Kilda but we still have a bit of work to do on that. Hope we are driving a hard bargain.
Click to expand...
They probably offered a third. We want their early second.
 
saint66au said:
Why?? North want him badly enough then they can pay overs. Hes a contracted player that we aren't looking to ship out.
Click to expand...
Why? Because I think that the best value we could get for him.

Easy to just say if they want him so badly they just need to pay up. Why don't we demand pick one then?

8 for Clark is well overs for a player that hasn't been on the park a lot for 2 years and career has stagnated a little.

I'm happy for him to stay. North probably are too if they have to over pay for him.

If we really want another top 10 pick the ball is in our court as much as it is in North's. We either hold onto Clark or give something else to come to the party to get that pick.
 
bird_man said:
I reckon we'd probably have to give up something along with Clark to get pick 8

Maybe the Long pick
Click to expand...
Well no deal. Why should we give away a player who the majority want to keep AND is contracted for nothing but overs?

Nothing fair about this trade. If he wants to go next year well yes, but he is contracted.

Personally I would prefer he stay and have a long career with the Saints. Pick 8 would be absolute minimum in my book.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

BrutThough said:
Probably settle on a late 2nd by the end of the week.
Click to expand...
Christ I hope not, surly he is worth more than that even though I don't rate him that highly
 
Joffaboy said:
Well no deal. Why should we give away a player who the majority want to keep AND is contracted for nothing but overs?

Nothing fair about this trade. If he wants to go next year well yes, but he is contracted.

Personally I would prefer he stay and have a long career with the Saints. Pick 8 would be absolute minimum in my book.
Click to expand...
Because we aren't the list managers. What the majority of us think means nothing to them.

Hope we do keep him, like I've been saying all along.

But if we really do want a top 10 pick I don't see it getting done without adding more to the trade unfortunately
 
That all sounded a bit cagey from the Goldie list manager. I reckon we’ve got Bowes right in our bulls eye 🎯
 

Saints on Hill, Clark, De Goey​

St Kilda list manager James Gallagher says running machine Bradley Hill is still a required player despite interest from clubs including North Melbourne.

"We haven't had any communication from North Melbourne at all," Gallagher told reporters at the opening day of the Continental Tyres AFL Trade Period at Marvel Stadium.

"We've had plenty of open discussions with Brad about his footy and what he wants to achieve and how happy he is and where he wants to play his footy for the remainder of his career, and all indications are that's at St Kilda.

"He's played a lot of good footy for us but probably hasn't quite been as consistent as we needed him to be and in fairness, he had some mates this year, so I reckon there's a lot more in Brad so we'd love to explore that and work with him to get as close as we can to his best footy.

"He's not easily replaceable, Brad, so that's our intention at the moment."

Gallagher also said defender Hunter Clark remained a required player, and the club didn't intend to trade its top pick at this year's NAB AFL Draft.

He added that the Saints were right in the mix to lure Collingwood's Jordan De Goey as a free agent "until 9 o'clock on Thursday night" but the resulting free cap space would allow the club to assess its options through the Trade Period.
 
Tarryn Thomas weighing up whether to ask for a trade according to Sam Edmond
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

George
  • Locked
List Mgmt. 2023 Trade Thread - Part III
396 397 398 399 400
Replies
10K
Views
382K
George
George
stavro#4
List Mgmt. 2023 Trade Thread - Part IV
65 66 67 68 69
Replies
2K
Views
77K
hangdog
hangdog
The Punter
  • Locked
List Mgmt. 2023 Trade Thread - Part II
396 397 398 399 400
Replies
10K
Views
396K
George
George
Dard Ball Get
List Mgmt. 2024 Trade Thread
61 62 63 64 65
Replies
2K
Views
75K
The_Steadier
The_Steadier
bird_man
List Mgmt. 2023 Draft Thread - Part I
185 186 187 188 189
Replies
5K
Views
198K
sunny3193
sunny3193
bird_man
  • Locked
List Mgmt. 2023 Trade Thread - Part I
396 397 398 399 400
Replies
10K
Views
368K
George
George
The Jack
Discussion Saints part ways with recruiting manager after restructure
17 18 19 20 21
Replies
511
Views
30K
Tyrian Lonestar
Tyrian Lonestar

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top