Is it possible for you to make a post without bringing it back to Fog? It is an unhealthy obsession.... and yet he'd still beat Fogarty in a foot race.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Is it possible for you to make a post without bringing it back to Fog? It is an unhealthy obsession.... and yet he'd still beat Fogarty in a foot race.
To be fair to vader the topic is lynch vs fog.Is it possible for you to make a post without bringing it back to Fog? It is an unhealthy obsession.
It doesn't really matter though, does it? If they ever went head-to-head in an actual game... Fog would be forced to give up, bending over and sucking in the big ones, half way through the 2nd quarter, while Lynch was still running strong late in the 4th.No he really wouldn't.
You don't watch us play at all do you.....
Wasn't me who started it. This is the post I (originally) replied to:Is it possible for you to make a post without bringing it back to Fog? It is an unhealthy obsession.
So, Fog is definitely playing Lynch role. Finally
Hately needs a CONSISTENT block of games, he will never make it otherwise. I’m not sure he does have what it takes, but we will always be second guessing if we don’t invest time into him.
WHaaaaaat the hell . Like to know what they are then. They are giant ruckman to our forwards Murphy ,McHenry and Rowe.Dixon yes, Marshall isn't really a KPF and nor is Georgiadies
Really!! Can’t a couch try different things in a rebuild year!! Some people are hard to pleaseNicks is another delusional coach. He doesn’t have that 3-4 year vision. He’s looking to push up the ladder now.
Lack of competition for his position. The only other alternative in the SANFL is Newchurch, who has the same weaknesses as Rowe - only worse.I would like someone to explain how jimmy rowe kept his spot and hatley got dropped ?
Lack of competition for his position. The only other alternative in the SANFL is Newchurch, who has the same weaknesses as Rowe - only worse.
Could hatley have played forward with some bursts in the midfield ?
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
It's like when people say Jenkins isn't a KPF. He's much more a KPF than Marshall is.WHaaaaaat the hell . Like to know what they are then. They are giant ruckman to our forwards Murphy ,McHenry and Rowe.
It doesn't really matter though, does it? If they ever went head-to-head in an actual game... Fog would be forced to give up, bending over and sucking in the big ones, half way through the 2nd quarter, while Lynch was still running strong late in the 4th.
Moot point now though, given that Lynch is MIA for the next 2 months due to injury.
What's the better option - trialling a kid in the forward line, after they fail in midfield; or, keeping the underperforming small forward, who at least knows how to play as a small forward?Could hatley have played forward with some bursts in the midfield ?
Like I said... It's a moot point, given that Lynch is MIA for at least the next 2 months due to injury.Lynch would be out for three months after the first physical contest, and you'd be back where posting about Fogarty being too big instead.
Well true but he hasn't come on just yet and isn't playing this game. 4 tall forwards on a wet day........geesWhy did they recruit McAsey then?
Why did they recruit McAsey then?
Whilst I'm not averse to giving Newchurch 2-3 games this year to see if his abilities translate better to AFL, he needs to work on body contact and second and third efforts...if he gets those two bits up to standard he will be a decent player. At the moment though he still has much to work on, which isn't a surprise given no team took him in either draft last year.
What's the better option - trialling a kid in the forward line, after they fail in midfield; or, keeping the underperforming small forward, who at least knows how to play as a small forward?
I get that Rowe isn't performing, but Hately hasn't been any better. There's not a lot of point in shuffling the team around, in order to keep an underperforming player in the team (even ahead of another under performing player).
We have always yo-yoed young players in and out of the team.
This week Hately and Murray have copped it. Last week it was Fogarty (who is now yo-yoed back in). Will keep happening.
Giving players a block of games in a rebuild is apparently beyond the capabilities of the club
Why should it be a like for like swap?Lack of competition for his position. The only other alternative in the SANFL is Newchurch, who has the same weaknesses as Rowe - only worse.
He'll get his opportunities, without needing to create them in positions he's never played before. He's only 1 deep at the moment as injury cover (2 deep when Crouch returns). That's close enough to the head of the queue that he should play a few more games before the end of the season.You are so correct but we need to see what hatley can do otherwise why recurit him. There is no need to play him in the SANFL
We've already dropped McAdam this week, and replaced him with Fogarty - so that's one less small forward in the equation.Why should it be a like for like swap?
Why do we need to play 3 small forwards?
Why not play 2 small forwards and and bring in an extra mid?
Sloane, Berry and Schoenberg can all push forward