Michalaney to Charlie, Murray to Daniher, Butts to Hipwood and Worrell to Gunston? Or does Doedee go to Gunston to free up Worrell to be the interceptor? I think the mix looks better with Worrell this week ahead of Parnell.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not worried. My stance was that I thought your post was unfair, but since nice explanation doesn't work, I'll spell it out. Your post to JW was unnecessarily belligerent.Why are you worried about what I said if that’s your stance?
You told him what he 'should' think and now you're trying to tell me what my opinion 'should' be ie what you say.Your opinion should be so what and move on.
Very fair and civil reply, thanks.I think what he was saying was we got flogged and it wouldn’t have mattered if we were at full strength as most of damage was around the ball
I agree
We already have that player in Thilthorpe. He is capable of being that contested marking beast up forward.Fog isn't a great contested mark. He needs to get on the lead. What we do need as a club is a tall that can crash packs and bring the ball to ground. Maybe Fog is that player but if he isn't we need to bring one in.
Capable yes, but he's much better at contested marks around the grounds then in the F50 at this point in his development. Feel like he still needs to work on his timing to high point the ball inside 50. Not an easy skill to master, and takes a certain degree of fearlessness.We already have that player in Thilthorpe. He is capable of being that contested marking beast up forward.
Patty Parnell is a contested mark beast (going off a sample space of one...)Fog isn't a great contested mark. He needs to get on the lead. What we do need as a club is a tall that can crash packs and bring the ball to ground. Maybe Fog is that player but if he isn't we need to bring one in.
Cmon on precious. If you don’t like me pointing out stupid posting, perhaps don’t read what I have to say.I'm not worried. My stance was that I thought your post was unfair, but since nice explanation doesn't work, I'll spell it out. Your post to JW was unnecessarily belligerent.
Example:
You told him what he 'should' think and now you're trying to tell me what my opinion 'should' be ie what you say.
Disagreement can create interesting, healthy discussion, but you just want to be right.
LOLI'm not worried. My stance was that I thought your post was unfair, but since nice explanation doesn't work, I'll spell it out. Your post to JW was unnecessarily belligerent.
Example:
You told him what he 'should' think and now you're trying to tell me what my opinion 'should' be ie what you say.
Disagreement can create interesting, healthy discussion, but you just want to be right.
Ooh can I play this game?LOL
You've been on this board 5 years or so and just worked out Elite Crow's modus operandi?
Well crowbloke doesn’t care about being right and John won’t admit to being wrong, so unless he’s got a split personality I don’t think soWhen do we start talking about Crowbloke and John Who being the same person
Does it feel a bit tall with Fog, Tex, Thilthorpe up forward and Murray, Butts, Dude, Worrell down back?
Is that confirmedIn: Worrell, Walker, Thilthorpe, Doedee
Out: Hinge (concussion), Parnell, Himmelberg, Gollant
If we can get over Brisbane we would be 3-4 with a 1 point loss. Unlikely though.After this week we'll have played 6 of the top 7 teams.
Is that confirmed
Is that confirmed
McHenry - subSurely they're not going to hold all 4 out of tonight's SANFL game, that would be ridiculous. 2 Max or even managed minutes for players tonight.
Midfielders Ned McHenry and Jackson Hately, defender Patrick Parnell, as well as forward Lachlan Gollant, have been named as the emergencies.